mastering your tracks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
mastering your tracks
hello
how do people get that punch in their tracks? when i make a tune and listen to it on my computer, it sounds alright but when i test it on a big system it sounds all vague and quiet, the low-end doesn't really stick out either the way i'd like it to. i try to mix the track a bit louder and try various eq's and sound fatteners but that just makes the volumes peak and when i render the track it just results as crackles and pops all around the tune due to the peaking. any advice?
how do people get that punch in their tracks? when i make a tune and listen to it on my computer, it sounds alright but when i test it on a big system it sounds all vague and quiet, the low-end doesn't really stick out either the way i'd like it to. i try to mix the track a bit louder and try various eq's and sound fatteners but that just makes the volumes peak and when i render the track it just results as crackles and pops all around the tune due to the peaking. any advice?
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:54 am
- Contact:
Re: mastering your tracks
Don't try to mix louder, that's gonna hurt. Find the gain structure / money shot thread and read through that.
As far as "mastering", I use izotope's ozone to add some punch.
shit's fucking dope.
As far as "mastering", I use izotope's ozone to add some punch.
shit's fucking dope.
- tripwire22
- Posts: 2384
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:30 pm
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: mastering your tracks
is ozone free? if not, is there a similar, free program? thanks for the tips!DJ Crackle wrote:Don't try to mix louder, that's gonna hurt. Find the gain structure / money shot thread and read through that.
As far as "mastering", I use izotope's ozone to add some punch.
shit's fucking dope.
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:54 am
- Contact:
Re: mastering your tracks
it is not. $250.
don't know of any allinone mastering suites as sick as ozone
but it's comprised of an EQ, loudness maximizer, stereo imager, multiband compressor, reverb, a harmonic exciter, and some other shit. you can get the parts individually, i'm sure there's free plugins that take care of those parts individually
don't know of any allinone mastering suites as sick as ozone
but it's comprised of an EQ, loudness maximizer, stereo imager, multiband compressor, reverb, a harmonic exciter, and some other shit. you can get the parts individually, i'm sure there's free plugins that take care of those parts individually
- Basic A
- Posts: 6037
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:53 am
- Location: Pittsburgh - You might know me as Teknicyde
- Contact:
Re: mastering your tracks
Address it as problems with your mixdown, not as problems with your mastering.
Youll never buff a turd into a diamond, try ll day, serious, give it a shit.
Youll never buff a turd into a diamond, try ll day, serious, give it a shit.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics
Soundcloud
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics
Re: mastering your tracks
Just read the moneyshot/mixing and mastering thread and it will solve all your problems. Once you have a decent MIX then if you really need it stick a limiter on the master and push the track up that way. You don't need to fuck about with stuff like ozone if you don't know how to use it, you will probably do more harm than good.
- tripwire22
- Posts: 2384
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:30 pm
- Location: United States
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:54 am
- Contact:
Re: mastering your tracks
True.paravrais wrote:Just read the moneyshot/mixing and mastering thread and it will solve all your problems. Once you have a decent MIX then if you really need it stick a limiter on the master and push the track up that way. You don't need to fuck about with stuff like ozone if you don't know how to use it, you will probably do more harm than good.
Re: mastering your tracks
Self mastering is like having a wank. It kinda gets the job done but if you get someone else to do it then it's a lot more pleasurable for everyone involved.
Disclaimer: I'm not suggesting you toss off your mastering engineer.
Disclaimer: I'm not suggesting you toss off your mastering engineer.
Re: mastering your tracks
Hitopmo3 wrote:hello
how do people get that punch in their tracks? when i make a tune and listen to it on my computer, it sounds alright but when i test it on a big system it sounds all vague and quiet, the low-end doesn't really stick out either the way i'd like it to. i try to mix the track a bit louder and try various eq's and sound fatteners but that just makes the volumes peak and when i render the track it just results as crackles and pops all around the tune due to the peaking. any advice?
'Punch' to me is taking good sounds and balancing them eq and compression wise to get a 'full' sound that is not overly or underly dynamic and has good harmonic distribution across the full frequency spectrum.
'Vague' sounds like the drums aren't high enough in your mix + maybe some overly present frequencies that are dominating your mix and not letting the 'punch' through.
'Quiet' sounds like you haven't turned the volume control up enough when playing out
Low-end is a tricky one, it's about getting enough of it there without one single frequency overpowering the rest of it. So search down there for a particular 'sore' bit that really stands out when eq sweeping, when/if you find it then use a narrow cut to reduce it a bit before being able to make a broader boost to bring up the rest of your bass.
Turn the output down to avoid clipping, focus on getting the song to sound as loud as possible without limiting / compressing heavily the stereo bus. Once you have that sorted send it over to the mastering engineer (with enough headroom) and job done!
Re: mastering your tracks
guess i'll just keep on making the thin-sounding low-volume tunes that have no balls. but thanks anyway for the effort man!lowpass wrote:Hitopmo3 wrote:hello
how do people get that punch in their tracks? when i make a tune and listen to it on my computer, it sounds alright but when i test it on a big system it sounds all vague and quiet, the low-end doesn't really stick out either the way i'd like it to. i try to mix the track a bit louder and try various eq's and sound fatteners but that just makes the volumes peak and when i render the track it just results as crackles and pops all around the tune due to the peaking. any advice?
'Punch' to me is taking good sounds and balancing them eq and compression wise to get a 'full' sound that is not overly or underly dynamic and has good harmonic distribution across the full frequency spectrum.
'Vague' sounds like the drums aren't high enough in your mix + maybe some overly present frequencies that are dominating your mix and not letting the 'punch' through.
'Quiet' sounds like you haven't turned the volume control up enough when playing out
Low-end is a tricky one, it's about getting enough of it there without one single frequency overpowering the rest of it. So search down there for a particular 'sore' bit that really stands out when eq sweeping, when/if you find it then use a narrow cut to reduce it a bit before being able to make a broader boost to bring up the rest of your bass.
Turn the output down to avoid clipping, focus on getting the song to sound as loud as possible without limiting / compressing heavily the stereo bus. Once you have that sorted send it over to the mastering engineer (with enough headroom) and job done!
Re: mastering your tracks
That's not what we're saying. The point is that mastering won't give balls to a tune that doesn't have them in the first place, it will only make them bigger. Your tunes need to grow their balls in the MIXING stage so turn your SPEAKERS up until it sounds loud enough (but don't produce the whole time like this only for a few seconds at a time to check it's still punchy) and once you have a MIX that's punchy, clear and solid then AND ONLY THEN will mastering help you in any way.
- tripwire22
- Posts: 2384
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:30 pm
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: mastering your tracks
dudes right which is why I linked a mixdown eq thread but let him master his poor mixdown he will learn
Re: mastering your tracks
Be sure to adress your core sampling to. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link, so start out with strong individual elements.
Last edited by Astral on Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For Production Tips Guides and Files:http://secondrateaudio.blogspot.com
For My Tunes: http://soundcloud.com/astraldubstep/
For My Tunes: http://soundcloud.com/astraldubstep/
Re: mastering your tracks
all good advice here, the last one especially, you cant polish a turd.
and i do say this often, but as it seems not often enough.
slapping ozone on the master aint mastering.
slapping ozone on the master aint mastering.
slapping ozone on the master aint mastering.
slapping ozone on the master aint mastering.
youll just feel its louder and go wow louder (remember to compare at equal loudness).
but what you have done in reality is introduced some (ugly) distortion and some bad multicompression that could fuck up your bass for example.
it is possible to selfmaster, but its a hard learning curve and you ll learn to mix right before youll produce any good mastered song.
and i do say this often, but as it seems not often enough.
slapping ozone on the master aint mastering.
slapping ozone on the master aint mastering.
slapping ozone on the master aint mastering.
slapping ozone on the master aint mastering.
youll just feel its louder and go wow louder (remember to compare at equal loudness).
but what you have done in reality is introduced some (ugly) distortion and some bad multicompression that could fuck up your bass for example.
it is possible to selfmaster, but its a hard learning curve and you ll learn to mix right before youll produce any good mastered song.
j_j wrote:doberman badgers ?? evil lil bastards
Re: mastering your tracks
If you know what you're doing with it, ozone is a fantastic tool. I use it on some individual tracks now for widening and saturation as well.
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Re: mastering your tracks
Sounds to me like the OP simply needs to work on mixing - it's not a mastering issue exactly. The gain structure thread linked earlier will help a lot!
On a sort of related note, if you're mastering your own stuff, the first question in your mind as soon as you change anything should be 'why didn't I do this in the mix?'. Or to put it another way; How are you going to hear things to fix, if you've not heard them during the umpteen hours spent the mix?
Mixing isn't mastering, mastering isn't mixing
On a sort of related note, if you're mastering your own stuff, the first question in your mind as soon as you change anything should be 'why didn't I do this in the mix?'. Or to put it another way; How are you going to hear things to fix, if you've not heard them during the umpteen hours spent the mix?
Mixing isn't mastering, mastering isn't mixing
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
Re: mastering your tracks
Check this out. Only $15 per tune. They do a great job.
http://www.symphonicdistribution.com/pa ... vices.html
http://www.symphonicdistribution.com/pa ... vices.html
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests