Reply from Rinse, RE: Barefiles

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
luke.envoy
>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:41 pm

Reply from Rinse, RE: Barefiles

Post by luke.envoy » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:12 pm

Hi all
i've spoken with sarah and gee and this is their reply
L

In response to Deapohs thread, firstly we have to express that we regret the way that deapoh has distorted the truth about this, as we've only ever dealt with him professionally considerately and openly.

we approached deapoh in recognition of his tireless work on recording rinse shows and had a good relationship with him. he was a team member and helped with rinse.
It was known early on to him and everyone that eventually the sets, interviews etc would have to start coming exclusively from the Rinse website, but after some time, his attitude changed considerably after he wanted us to allow him to sell recordings of the rinse broadcasts.
He was insisting that the sets be sold from Barefiles with a percentage going to Rinse. for many reasons, the only site that we can sell rinse sets from is the rinse site. This is a perfectly normal and reasonable request and at no point was it a decision made to 'boy Deapoh as he is claiming.
one of the proposed solutions for sharing the sale of Rinse sets was to incorporate deapoh into rinse:
'' we could buy it (Barefiles) off you, incorporate it into rinse and give you a cut of the company still?
I wanted to give you a chance to think about it... I'd like it if we could meet to talk about it?
Safe
sarah''
thats a quote from the email conversations about the rinse sets. We feel that out of context quotes were used against us by deapoh in the thread from that conversation, so we've included the unedited emails at the end so you can make your own minds up. Its a shame to have to go into such detail, it should have never been made public.
for the record and those that asked, sarah is ammunition (geenues is not involved) and is a partner of rinse with geeneus. at no point was ammunition involved with barefiles

Barefiles has given Rinse alot of international coverage with thousands of downloads of dubstep sets from the station to go on the site, which was a great exchange. but it does not give him the right over selling the rinse sets, which is what deapoh is so angry about. its obviously a big deal to him as rinse sets have been on there since barefiles started, the best thing to do was offer him options to bridge the gap between sites, but an agreement couldnt be made.
We know hes frustrated, but to go on a forum and slander ammunition and its crew was unprofessional and out of order, whatever his stance

Rinse has been broadcasting for 13 years and first programmed dubstep when hatcha + kode 9 came on the station in 2003, we loved and stood by the music at a time when exposure was minimal and we'll continue to support our artists and DJs, we encourage you to ask any actual DJ or colleague of Rinse and they will back this up.

We are looking to move beyond this situation for the sake of Rinse and Barefiles in what should have been a private matter over the sale and distribution of Rinse fm sets

peace
Rinse fm crew


On 01/12/06, Sarah <sarah> wrote:

Listen, Gee and I have been meaning to ask you; we want to buy barefiles from you, we could buy it off you, incorporate it into rinse and give you a cut of the company still?

I wanted to give you a chance to think about it... I'd like it if we could meet to talk about it?

Safe

sarah

******************************************************

Paul Rose (Scuba) asked to pay for all the servers from Hotflush on Apr-21-2006. I wouldn't feel right selling it to anyone sorry. But of course I'd love Rinse to be involved somehow.

Lets talk about it more next time.

Bless,

Deapoh.

******************************************************

On 12/01/07, Sarah <sarah> wrote:

Ez Deapoh

How you doing? Happy 2007 bruv, hope you enjoyed the festive season : )

This email is to try to clarify how you will work with Rinse. Seen as

we haven't got round to meeting I figure its best to do this by email.

So, we need someone to oversee the download section of rinse as

discussed. The exact specs as to how the files will be manually

uploaded and then downloaded by the user is to be ironed out. What I need to know from you is do you want to oversee the process once it's set up, including recording and editing each file/set, and giving input where relevant to how the whole system should operate.

If you are up for it then we need to establish what you want in return. Also its worth saying for the record that barefiles will no longer be able to host rinse sets, and we would like to be able to use the existing sets.

Please can you give us an idea how you see it best working, so far what you have done with barefiles is amazing and we want to work with you long term. I'd like to figure out how we can move forward with you working with us, rather than a casual arrangement I want to confirm how it will run now so all involved knows what's what.

Let me know your thoughts on this, firstly if you are into the idea then if you would prefer us to come up with some options that's cool too, just let me know...

Big up

Sarah

******************************************************

Begin forwarded message:

Hi,

Happy 2007. Had a quiet one over Christmas but New Years was round

FWD as usual, second home business. That night was liiive.. I can't quite remember it, I drunk a lot and smoked a lot but enjoyed it.

I've been meaning to email you about the Rinse mixes. What I’m setting up on Barefiles is a registration thing where you buy a certain amount of mixes so £25 = 1000 downloads. Or something like this, not sure on pricing exactly, might do a yearly registration but I can see this brining in a lot of money. Also will allow anyone to submit mixes that will be checked and uploaded. So everyones got a chance of being found out about.

I was thinking if we include the Rinse FM mixes on Barefiles still as

many people know that site for mixes. I can write you a script so

people can access it from the Rinse site. Of course I don't mind

recording from the studio so it's higher quality and cutting it up. I've read from quite a few people they're dieing for higher quality. Even 128 stereo people would be happy with. We could work out a package where you get more Rinse mixes but at a higher price etc. And between us we can work out a percentage of the money thats being brought in.

Registered Barefiles as a Ltd company the other day.

The legal radio mixes will be kept free so I don't get done in.

Let me know what you think of this.


Bless,

Deapoh.

******************************************************

On 28/01/07, Sarah <sarah> wrote:

EZ D

Hope you're cool

Apologies for the formal tone but rather than let there be any

misunderstanding from now on I want to be very clear about the Rinse/Barefiles situation.

The only site/host/place that ANY Rinse sets or sets from Rinse FM

artists; including pre-records, recordings of the stream, live

events , performances, interviews (and any other) across all formats will ONLY be available from an official Rinse site from now on (i.e. rinse.fm and for the avoidance of doubt this means not on Barefiles)

We have been working towards setting this up for months now and we will be making sure that any re-hosting of our content gets stopped ASAP. We have the governing copyright protection agencies to help us control this (as we have the relevant licenses set up already)

There is no way we will be changing our mind about this and need you to be clearly informed.

I figure its best you digest this information and think about if its

worth meeting, I don't want to waste your or our time. Think about

it and should you still want to meet we will be more than happy to.

Safe

Sarah

******************************************************

Dear Sarah,

We here at Barefiles Ltd. are absolutely shocked at the position your taking regarding the Barefiles/Rinse.FM situation. The intent of this email is for Rinse.FM to clearly understand our position in the matter and hopefully bring light to some points that we don't think Rinse.FM is considering.

First off, we would like to bring to your attention all the time Barefiles has spent working for Rinse over the past year. We feel that we have put forth a considerable amount of time and effort and deserve to be compensated in some way. Dean has spent hours on end recording and uploading Rinse.FM mixes to the Barefiles server over this past year. A large portion of time spent was strictly to the advantage of Rinse.FM. Is Barefiles to understand that Rinse.FM feels no compensation is necessary here?

You have to realise that there would not be such a high demand for Rinse.FM sets if it was not for us recording and hosting them over the past year. It is not good business for Rinse.FM to try and bully away this momentum that Barefiles has created. Hours and hours were spent creating Barefiles.com and making the name what it is, now Rinse.FM wants to come in and steal the thunder just because we did not want to sell the website? We feel this is very unprofessional.

Barefiles.com is a much bigger and a more established global brand than Rinse.FM. Barefiles has given Rinse.FM a lot of global recognition over the past year. Rinse.FM would not have even close to the global fan base it has now without people downloading from our website. We spread and advertised the Rinse.FM name around the world. Factually speaking, Barefiles gave Rinse.FM more of an international position than Rinse.FM has EVER created for itself.

On average there are 25000 sets a month downloaded from Barefiles. Of these sets about half are Rinse.FM sets. Barefiles feels it would be in Rinse.FM's best interests to have users download Rinse.FM sets from Barefiles.com and receive a cut of the profit. Full details would have to be worked out.

How many people are going to pay to download Rinse.FM mixes when they can listen for free? Since the website has been offline for 2 weeks, there have been numerous other people recording the stream and hosting the recording. It will be nearly impossible for Rinse.FM to stop this from happening. Even if Rinse.FM has relevant copyright licenses in place, it is extremely expensive to pay copyright lawyers. If the sets are hosted outside of the UK, Rinse.FM will have to pay international copyright lawyers to fight their cause. We wonder if Rinse.FM has any idea in the actual costs surrounding copyrighting. We feel that if Barefiles.com was to continue hosting mixes this re-hosting would be cut to a minimum due to the loyalty and respect people have towards our very well established brand name.

If Barefiles was to start selling its mixes separate from Rinse.FM, we think most people would pay to login to Barefiles.com over Rinse.FM because anyone can listen to your station for free while our site contains "new" or unheard material. Please keep in mind that the Rinse.FM shows are almost the exact same material from week to week. Same tunes from the same DJ's, music progression is still very slow in the scene. We feel that giving users the ability to download Rinse.FM sets as well as other sets would advantage Rinse.FM due to the fact users would have more choice in what they can download. It's more bang for the buck. Also have you considered that you must pay the DJ aswell as artists in the mix for selling their music?

Barefiles Ltd already has the ability to process credit cards, debit cards and PayPal payments. We assume you are aware of the costs involved in setting up these types of payment processors and will realise that it is cheaper to set them up for one site rather than two. We have a new, considerable large, marketing budget to spend in 2007. We are preparing for various different ad spends over the next year that would also be to the advantage of Rinse.FM. More information on these ad spends will be brought to light if an outcome is pursued that is beneficial to both parties.

The name Barefiles.com stretches far beyond the grime and dubstep scene limits and is responsible for exposing the sound to many new people. The website is listed/linked on countless other websites that are not scene related and we have also been mentioned in various magazines, newspapers and on numerous flyers. We will continue to expose even more people to the sound with our new marketing budget. Exposing new people to the sound has been our underlying motivation from the start.

The name Barefiles is going to continue to grow and will only be further excelled with the addition of its sister company Bare Dubs Ltd. Bare Dubs has many forth coming releases and will soon be selling its vinyl releases online in conjunction with Barefiles.com. We are also in the talks of selling mp3 copies of the vinyl releases on our sites as well as others.

Barefiles Ltd does not want to sound overly harsh but, Rinse.FM will receive a negative image in the scene if we are no longer able to host Rinse.FM mixes. We have explained the current situation to a few "key players" in the scene and let's just say their reactions have not been good. Barefiles.com is prepared to change its front page to inform the public of the current situation as well as post on dubstepforum.com.

We would like to thank you for considering everyone's time and its great that you don't want to waste anyone's time, but if we cant work something out, Barefiles is going to sustain a considerable amount of time wasted.

Thanks,

Barefiles Ltd.

adruu
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:59 am
Location: desert skyscraper

Post by adruu » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:31 pm

eh...back to ysi's

autonomic
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: ottawa
Contact:

Post by autonomic » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:41 pm

^^ Ahhh. Simpler times
---

First thing, thanks Luke, Sarah and Geeneus

Second, let's please try to keep this thread free of the posturing and unverifiable statements that polluted the other one.

Third, it seems that the situation is somewhat more complex than it originally appeared.

NOTE: I've edited a careless comment to avoid adding fuel to the fire.
Last edited by autonomic on Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:51 am, edited 5 times in total.

User avatar
seckle
Posts: 12404
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:58 pm

Post by seckle » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:43 pm

autonomic wrote: try to keep this thread free of the posturing and unverifiable statements that polluted the other one.
150% agreement. the whole moderation team is watching this now. please everyone, keep things civil.

cheers.


the 1st thread hasn't been deleted just locked.
Last edited by seckle on Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 318
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:33 pm

Post by rachel » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:45 pm

autonomic wrote:First thing, thanks Luke, Sarah and Geeneus

it seems that the situation is considerably more complex than the forum was initially led to believe. Also, a lot of people donated financially to Barefiles which, sometime thereafter, became a limited corporation with a profit-driven business model.
seconded. maybe part of the nu marketing budget could be used to reimburse?

basically this whole thing smacks of dirty laundry. business is business - i buy tunes, i go to nights, i download sets. i don't really want to know abt the dealings that make all of this possible. as you were...

jim
Posts: 1491
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: The Neverland Ranch
Contact:

Post by jim » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:47 pm

Thanks for the reply.

marsyas
Posts: 3034
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:31 pm

Post by marsyas » Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:05 am

INTERESTING

User avatar
d-range
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: steppin' international

Post by d-range » Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:10 am

Ideas that were discussed along the way are being taken as fact.

Please keep time lines and dates in mind when reading this.

A lot of discussions took place and ideas were thrown around, this does not mean they were going to be acted upon.

There were a lot more communications than just emails.


d-range

obiwan
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:43 pm
Location: Planet Hackney

Post by obiwan » Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:20 am

I don't feel I've been misled by anyone, and I think saying that I have is a distortion of the truth. One time Barefiles was free, so were the sets, Rinse IS illegal and its free for those who live in the vicinity to listen to it, or (sometimes) possible for those on the internet to stream it, FOR free.
FWD and Ammunition have been making small amounts of money for a while FROM A FOLLOWING THAT DOES SO ON A LOYALTY BASIS! If they want that loyalty to remain strong, then they should not make attempts to carve up the distribution of the music so that they can get more money.
As has been repeated, Rinse breaches artist copyright again and again and again, with no real legal problem. A lasting solution is found to Rinse FMs weaknesses; all of a sudden there is a problem. I know people that are dedicated to the music should be rewarded enought to carry on doing it, but if anyone tries to monopolise a genre they will not find themselves in a good situation. MyImage
2 New Tunes Up On The Top Myspace Address!!!

> http://www.myspace.com/dubfarma <
http://www.myspace.com/bigbenlondon

User avatar
d-range
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: steppin' international

Post by d-range » Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:29 am

and one more quick note to follow up my last post...

deapoh never had the intent to sell any radio mixes. it was talked about sure, he put in a lot of hard work and did maybe deserve a few pence for a "service charge" but in in the end it was found unreasonable to make a profit off any recorded radio.

radio mixes on barefiles would have and always will remain free.


d-range

flipw
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:07 pm
Location: London

Post by flipw » Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:32 am

you are right because the emails on their own read like this to me:

01/12/06
<Sarah>
can rinse buy barefiles?
________________________________________
<Deapoh>
no
________________________________________
12/01/07
<Sarah>
will you work for rinse setting up and running the downloads bit?

barefiles will no longer be able to host rinse sets

we would like to use the existing sets you recorded

if you would prefer us to come up with some options that's cool too, just let me know...
________________________________________
<Deapoh>
I'm setting up a barefiles download club for £25 annual membership

I propose we host rinse mixes on barefiles

Barefiles is a Ltd company
________________________________________
28/01/07,
<Sarah>
No. rinse mixes will only available from rinse.fm (not barefiles)

we have decided this is our position and we will use the law to stop others hosting

think about it
________________________________________
<Deapoh>
WTF

In 2006 Barefiles worked a lot, successfully promoting Rinses interests, especially to the overseas market. is that worth something? I feel shafted

I think it would be best all round if we use the established barefiles (global brand, customers, and payment facilities), host rinse mixes on barefiles, and share the profits

Barefiles and our new label Baredubs have big plans for 2007

if Rinse mixes are taken off Barefiles then the scene will likely not be happy
and I may post the story on the forum and maybe barefiles.

think about it

j_j
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:20 pm

Post by j_j » Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:58 am

QUOTE:
Listen, Gee and I have been meaning to ask you; we want to buy barefiles from you, we could buy it off you, incorporate it into rinse and give you a cut of the company still?

I wanted to give you a chance to think about it... I'd like it if we could meet to talk about it?

Safe

sarah


great opportunity i think. :!:

doomstep
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:54 am
Location: Pt.Adelaide

Post by doomstep » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:20 am

rachel wrote:
autonomic wrote: Also, a lot of people donated financially to Barefiles which, sometime thereafter, became a limited corporation with a profit-driven business model.
seconded. maybe part of the nu marketing budget could be used to reimburse?
as someone that donated - im proper pissed



:|

pompende
Posts: 2897
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:57 am
Location: 38104
Contact:

Post by pompende » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:30 am

WOW.

just a heads up to rinse famo: i dont have scratch to pay for radio sets...please think twice about charging for them.
brasco wrote:evolution via youtube tutorials
Image

User avatar
d-range
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: steppin' international

Post by d-range » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:32 am

doomstep wrote:
rachel wrote:
autonomic wrote: Also, a lot of people donated financially to Barefiles which, sometime thereafter, became a limited corporation with a profit-driven business model.
seconded. maybe part of the nu marketing budget could be used to reimburse?
as someone that donated - im proper pissed



:|

I donated as well. Im not pissed at all.

Barefiles could not continue to operate for free and was simply looking for a way to justify its existence.

It was either close it up for good, or start looking for a way to pay for the servers.

The time it took to run such a service was immense, more than a full time job.

d-range

josephine
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:43 pm

Post by josephine » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:36 am

doomstep wrote:
rachel wrote:
autonomic wrote: Also, a lot of people donated financially to Barefiles which, sometime thereafter, became a limited corporation with a profit-driven business model.
seconded. maybe part of the nu marketing budget could be used to reimburse?
as someone that donated - im proper pissed



:|
Did the fact that Deapoh maybe wanted to Register the Barefiles/Baredubs name inorder to copyright it and keep things legit never occur to anyone? And if you even know Deapoh you would know he is sincere and has only lost money. ALOT of money infact. The money he used to pay for the LTD registration came from his 18th birthday fund!!

Please think about things before making irrational and uninformed posts.

autonomic
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: ottawa
Contact:

Post by autonomic » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:39 am

^^ I've edited that comment and I'm going to keep my mouth shut about it. My point was that money becomes a serious complicating factor in any 'scenius' situation.

doomstep
Posts: 1159
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:54 am
Location: Pt.Adelaide

Post by doomstep » Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:50 am

I am fully aware of how much blood swear & tears have gone into barefiles - since first chatting with deapoh on irc in 2005 untill the most recent incarnation of the site - I know how much man has done & thats why I donated - and would do so again - to a not-for-profit organisation.

this (the whole debacle) - ina wider sense is about communication - or lack thereof.

it might seem like alot - or not. but a simple email to the 60 odd people that donated explaining what was going on would've avoided this.

ufo over easy
Posts: 4589
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:27 am

Post by ufo over easy » Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:05 am

I don't see that this changes anything.

It was posted on the forum ages ago that deapoh was looking into registrations and changes to the way barefiles would work. To be honest, I'm surprised it stayed up free as long as it did if it was being hammered with tens of thousands of downloads every month without advertising. Not even thinking about how much time was spent recording, editing and uploading, bandwidth is seriously expensive; you can't pay for websites with big ups.

I also think Deapoh has been misrepresented by this. As far as I can see, he didn't slander anyone. He posted up the facts, and people drew their own conclusions. The snippets he posted didn't demonise Ammunition, and they didn't distort the truth. Respect for posting up the full emails, but the situation is the same.
for the record and those that asked, sarah is ammunition (geenues is not involved) and is a partner of rinse with geeneus. at no point was ammunition involved with barefiles
Even if there was no official link, for a lot of people Barefiles was Rinse. The stream is wobbly at best, and if you don't live in East London you can't listen to the FM. Some rinse sets will have had thousands of times the amount of downloads as live listeners, and not to recognise this seems ludicrous to me.
for many reasons, the only site that we can sell rinse sets from is the rinse site.
Fair enough, but this isn't what's being demanded. It's not just the selling of sets that's prohibited, but the hosting of anything Rinse-related! Not just Rinse sets either, but any content involving Rinse DJs! Ammunition have the interests of the company at heart, but in my opinion, their attempt to lock down all the content being played by Rinse DJs is short sighted at best, especially until they're in a position to host sets reliably themselves.
:d:

User avatar
logos
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:26 am
Location: E8

Post by logos » Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:17 am

UFO over easy wrote:especially until they're in a position to host sets reliably themselves.
Agreed. I can't lock in to the FM and its pretty difficult to listen to my favourite shows because of my schedule...I await to be as impressed by the reliability, quality and breadth of the rinse podcast as I was by barefiles...

I can't see how anyone, let alone the DJs, artists and fans are going to benefit from any of this.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests