perhaps in the context of anything other than that bradock tune, yes

BananaClips wrote:"you're hot for me tonight
it's gonna be alright
i'm gonna hold you tight"

make munneh-munneh, make munneh-munneh-munneh

whilst i don't like peppermint at all there is absolutely nothing wrong with those lyrics

Phigure wrote:yeah and hackman

thanks dickhead

FuDuzn wrote:We get it, you hate George Bush and want to believe he is so evil that he would orchestrate such a dastardly attack on his own people.

with this sentence, you just proved how dim witted you are, mad props

kingGhost wrote:love when people say "well if <x producer> made this track you'd like it" - no, i wouldn't, see, because <x producer> wouldn't make such a shit tune. fuck off.

sounds like you don't love it at all : (

1964 The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is used by America to start a war with North Vietnam. later reports prove that there was no attack. 2003 Possession of weapons of mass destruction is used by America to start a war with Iraq. later reports prove there were none. 2011 Assassination plot to kill Saudi...

parson wrote:this is nuts
http://vimeo.com/27240681

yeh boiii

so another one for the western globalist empire then : )

go team west

part of my pharmaceutical chemistry degree. ahhh i see :lol: yet again the big pharma companies and their nwo cover up tactics! :corndance: i guess more to the point people who work for the pharmaceutical industry tend to be the most narrow minded, evil, boring wankers on the face of the earth

hugh wrote:part of my pharmaceutical chemistry degree.

ahhh i see

DUDE ITZ THE GHOST OF MICHAEL JACKSON

hugh wrote:Explain why there are no videos of ghosts during the day

mj doing the ghost moonwalk
alsos, ur an idiotz

Don't believe in them, but I have seen something I could only explain as a ghost at the time and since. Person next to me saw it as well... weirdest thing was, we then heard about lots of people having a similar experience on the same stretch of road. Properly odd. I've never been able to explain i...

word
shows like that do nothing but discredit
i reckon that's why they're on tv in the first place

DRTY wrote:When you're dead you're dead. There's nothing more.

what led you to this conclusion? living in bournemouth?

makes me proud of my finnish roots

The i reckon part is his justification for his definitive view. So how can he have a definitive view when his justification is based on a guess? doesn't matter anyway, you know what i mean, stop being grammar noob : ) BUT AH LUV WERDZ N DAT VOE LYK WOT AH RITE ON KARDS WEN ITZ MA NANOZ BERFDAY N DA...

unwind wrote:

raboonthebaboon wrote:irrelevant question, as i saw them myself

Prove it

just offering my experience seamus, gi' us a smile

Ghosts definitely not. I reckon contradiction not really squire err he's saying something for definite, then he follows with i reckon which is it, you sure or you just guessing? (ruari89) that's a rhetorical question btw nah the rest of the sentence is just qualification, the 'i reckon' is irreleva...