Nevalo wrote:you're from the production forum, right?

Nevalo wrote:you're from the production forum, right?
I don't appreciate you. I don't dislike you. You're just... Here.Maccaveli wrote:That's ok, you'll get better one day. I'm glad you appreciate us
So, did you forget to read the bold text in my sig or......Maccaveli wrote:http://www.discogs.com/label/RephlexDj Rephlex wrote:Maccaveli wrote:
Maccaveli wrote:
Damn, I didn't think many people liked it so I started experimenting. I might get back into it, especially now that I've spent about a half a year straight getting better sound quality/sample quality. I'll see how it turns outjohney wrote:Rephlex, you used to make sick grime, what happened?
Mark-Creda wrote:
Switching to different projects throughout the day helps as well.
It's all part of the work we love to do.
Exactly. Any producer will tell you to use some kind of analyzer etc.. to get yourself in the ball park. Your ears are your most reliable tool.outbound wrote:It makes sense to use as a starting point and then use your ears to get it tighter in time.
That's funny because you called it a tune. If it's a tune, it's music.Maccaveli wrote:So... like the tune in your signature?Dj Rephlex wrote:People are now putting random sounds/hits in random order and calling it music.