hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click
HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
caeraphym
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:20 pm
Post
by caeraphym » Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:57 pm
As stated in title.
What's the cleanest, truest, most accurate sine wave generating VST available today?
Freeware and/or payware, and reasons behind choices if you please, thanks

-
flateric
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:23 pm
Post
by flateric » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:05 pm
Caeraphym wrote:As stated in title.
What's the cleanest, truest, most accurate sine wave generating VST available today?
Freeware and/or payware, and reasons behind choices if you please, thanks

Why do you need a "clean" sine wave? They sound bassier with harmonics.
-
zgomot
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:42 pm
- Location: bat country
-
Contact:
Post
by zgomot » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:08 pm
This.
flateric wrote:
Why do you need a "clean" sine wave? They sound bassier with harmonics.
And sinewaves are clean by definition. It's the cleanest, purest waveform there is.
-
caeraphym
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:20 pm
Post
by caeraphym » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:15 pm
zgomot wrote:And sinewaves are clean by definition. It's the cleanest, purest waveform there is.
Yes granted, but I'd read somewhere that not every VST was capable of generating an exact precise sine wave, more a rough approximation of one, so I threw this out there to hopefully quench my curiosity on the subject. Any information welcomed with open ears...
-
james fox
- Posts: 1254
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:02 am
- Location: sarf
Post
by james fox » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:16 pm
i use z3ta and it seems to do the trick
-
paradigm_x
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am
Post
by paradigm_x » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:23 pm
generate one in wavelab/soundforge/(i assume) audacity.
Be about as clean as you get, pure mathmatical function, no envelopes, filters etc (even is fully open etc, may contribute).
-
Pallms
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:32 am
- Location: California
Post
by Pallms » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:30 pm
Paradigm X wrote:generate one in wavelab/soundforge/(i assume) audacity.
Be about as clean as you get, pure mathmatical function, no envelopes, filters etc (even is fully open etc, may contribute).
I second this.
-
martello
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:46 pm
- Location: Estonia
Post
by martello » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:49 pm
How does look pure mathematical sine in freq analyzer? Just a vertical line?
Is it right?
-
FSTZ1
- Posts: 3438
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:27 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by FSTZ1 » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:55 pm
ham vst!
-
macc
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
-
Contact:
Post
by macc » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:56 pm
Yes, in an ideal world it would look like a line like that - in reality won't depending on the block size used by the analyser (it will look 'rounder' or wider).
-
Brisance
- Posts: 1586
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:09 pm
- Location: Estonia
Post
by Brisance » Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:00 pm
3xOSC, I mean do you really need to waste more processing power and RAM for a bloody sine wave. Besides 3xOSC supports the slide function, which is awesome for instant brap.
-
futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
-
Contact:
Post
by futures_untold » Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:56 pm
Paradigm X wrote:generate one in wavelab/soundforge/audition/audacity.
Be about as clean as you get, pure mathmatical function, no envelopes, filters etc
x3
Also MDA Tone Generator
Audacity does have a tone generator, as does adobe audition.

-
rendr
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:53 am
- Location: London
-
Contact:
Post
by rendr » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:14 pm
futures_untold wrote:Paradigm X wrote:generate one in wavelab/soundforge/audition/audacity.
Be about as clean as you get, pure mathmatical function, no envelopes, filters etc
x3
Also MDA Tone Generator
Audacity does have a tone generator, as does adobe audition.

+ Logic Pro 8
-
dj vision
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:34 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Post
by dj vision » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:35 pm
Brisance wrote:3xOSC, I mean do you really need to waste more processing power and RAM for a bloody sine wave. Besides 3xOSC supports the slide function, which is awesome for instant brap.
Seconded!
ive been using 3xOsc more and more every day, it saves me sooo much CPU, and i can get amazing leads out of it with proper EQ and processing, and then save the CPU for z3ta and massive and such when i need it
-
paradigm_x
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am
Post
by paradigm_x » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:40 pm
use in conjunction with
THIS to generate notes ratherthan random tones.
if you wanted to be anal you could generate an octave or so and bung in sampler for 100% perfect (or as close as possible) pure sub

-
futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
-
Contact:
Post
by futures_untold » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:55 pm
Paradigm X wrote:use in conjunction with
THIS to generate notes ratherthan random tones.
if you wanted to be anal you could generate an octave or so and bung in sampler for 100% perfect (or as close as possible) pure sub

And if you compressed each note to output at exactly the same volume, there would be none of those pesky 'one note in my bassline is louder then the rest' threads

-
caeraphym
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:20 pm
Post
by caeraphym » Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:06 pm
futures_untold wrote:Paradigm X wrote:use in conjunction with
THIS to generate notes ratherthan random tones.
if you wanted to be anal you could generate an octave or so and bung in sampler for 100% perfect (or as close as possible) pure sub

And if you compressed each note to output at exactly the same volume, there would be none of those pesky 'one note in my bassline is louder then the rest' threads

Ahh, see now we're getting somewhere
Disclaimer: Sorry if this seems a silly thread, I just felt like rattling your brains over sines, so thank you for not ripping me to shreds over this

-
paradigm_x
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am
Post
by paradigm_x » Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:27 pm
futures_untold wrote:Paradigm X wrote:use in conjunction with
THIS to generate notes ratherthan random tones.
if you wanted to be anal you could generate an octave or so and bung in sampler for 100% perfect (or as close as possible) pure sub

And if you compressed each note to output at exactly the same volume, there would be none of those pesky 'one note in my bassline is louder then the rest' threads

well since youre generating them theyll all be the same volume anyway.



-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Post
by deadly_habit » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:34 pm
trilogy is my fave
or tape 808 pack
then again i like some grit and harmonics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests