Sine Waves - what's the best VST for generating them?

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
caeraphym
Posts: 698
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:20 pm

Sine Waves - what's the best VST for generating them?

Post by caeraphym » Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:57 pm

As stated in title.

What's the cleanest, truest, most accurate sine wave generating VST available today?

Freeware and/or payware, and reasons behind choices if you please, thanks :wink:

User avatar
flateric
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Sine Waves - what's the best VST for generating them?

Post by flateric » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:05 pm

Caeraphym wrote:As stated in title.

What's the cleanest, truest, most accurate sine wave generating VST available today?

Freeware and/or payware, and reasons behind choices if you please, thanks :wink:
:roll:

Why do you need a "clean" sine wave? They sound bassier with harmonics.

User avatar
zgomot
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:42 pm
Location: bat country
Contact:

Re: Sine Waves - what's the best VST for generating them?

Post by zgomot » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:08 pm

This.
flateric wrote:
Why do you need a "clean" sine wave? They sound bassier with harmonics.



And sinewaves are clean by definition. It's the cleanest, purest waveform there is.
Image

User avatar
caeraphym
Posts: 698
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:20 pm

Re: Sine Waves - what's the best VST for generating them?

Post by caeraphym » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:15 pm

zgomot wrote:And sinewaves are clean by definition. It's the cleanest, purest waveform there is.
Yes granted, but I'd read somewhere that not every VST was capable of generating an exact precise sine wave, more a rough approximation of one, so I threw this out there to hopefully quench my curiosity on the subject. Any information welcomed with open ears...

james fox
Posts: 1254
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:02 am
Location: sarf

Post by james fox » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:16 pm

i use z3ta and it seems to do the trick

paradigm_x
Posts: 2164
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am

Post by paradigm_x » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:23 pm

generate one in wavelab/soundforge/(i assume) audacity.

Be about as clean as you get, pure mathmatical function, no envelopes, filters etc (even is fully open etc, may contribute).

Pallms
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:32 am
Location: California

Post by Pallms » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:30 pm

Paradigm X wrote:generate one in wavelab/soundforge/(i assume) audacity.

Be about as clean as you get, pure mathmatical function, no envelopes, filters etc (even is fully open etc, may contribute).
I second this.

martello
Posts: 655
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: Estonia

Post by martello » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:49 pm

How does look pure mathematical sine in freq analyzer? Just a vertical line?

Image


Is it right?

FSTZ1
Posts: 3438
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:27 pm
Contact:

Post by FSTZ1 » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:55 pm

ham vst!

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:56 pm

Yes, in an ideal world it would look like a line like that - in reality won't depending on the block size used by the analyser (it will look 'rounder' or wider).
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

Brisance
Posts: 1586
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: Estonia

Post by Brisance » Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:00 pm

3xOSC, I mean do you really need to waste more processing power and RAM for a bloody sine wave. Besides 3xOSC supports the slide function, which is awesome for instant brap.

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:56 pm

Paradigm X wrote:generate one in wavelab/soundforge/audition/audacity.

Be about as clean as you get, pure mathmatical function, no envelopes, filters etc
x3

Also MDA Tone Generator

Audacity does have a tone generator, as does adobe audition.

:)

rendr
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:53 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by rendr » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:14 pm

futures_untold wrote:
Paradigm X wrote:generate one in wavelab/soundforge/audition/audacity.

Be about as clean as you get, pure mathmatical function, no envelopes, filters etc
x3

Also MDA Tone Generator

Audacity does have a tone generator, as does adobe audition.

:)
+ Logic Pro 8

dj vision
Posts: 429
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:34 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Post by dj vision » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:35 pm

Brisance wrote:3xOSC, I mean do you really need to waste more processing power and RAM for a bloody sine wave. Besides 3xOSC supports the slide function, which is awesome for instant brap.
Seconded!

ive been using 3xOsc more and more every day, it saves me sooo much CPU, and i can get amazing leads out of it with proper EQ and processing, and then save the CPU for z3ta and massive and such when i need it

paradigm_x
Posts: 2164
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am

Post by paradigm_x » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:40 pm

use in conjunction with THIS to generate notes ratherthan random tones.

if you wanted to be anal you could generate an octave or so and bung in sampler for 100% perfect (or as close as possible) pure sub :6:

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:48 pm

FSTZ wrote:ham vst!
This. :z:

Image

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:55 pm

Paradigm X wrote:use in conjunction with THIS to generate notes ratherthan random tones.

if you wanted to be anal you could generate an octave or so and bung in sampler for 100% perfect (or as close as possible) pure sub :6:
And if you compressed each note to output at exactly the same volume, there would be none of those pesky 'one note in my bassline is louder then the rest' threads Image

User avatar
caeraphym
Posts: 698
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:20 pm

Post by caeraphym » Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:06 pm

futures_untold wrote:
Paradigm X wrote:use in conjunction with THIS to generate notes ratherthan random tones.

if you wanted to be anal you could generate an octave or so and bung in sampler for 100% perfect (or as close as possible) pure sub :6:
And if you compressed each note to output at exactly the same volume, there would be none of those pesky 'one note in my bassline is louder then the rest' threads Image
Ahh, see now we're getting somewhere :5:

Disclaimer: Sorry if this seems a silly thread, I just felt like rattling your brains over sines, so thank you for not ripping me to shreds over this -w-

paradigm_x
Posts: 2164
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am

Post by paradigm_x » Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:27 pm

futures_untold wrote:
Paradigm X wrote:use in conjunction with THIS to generate notes ratherthan random tones.

if you wanted to be anal you could generate an octave or so and bung in sampler for 100% perfect (or as close as possible) pure sub :6:
And if you compressed each note to output at exactly the same volume, there would be none of those pesky 'one note in my bassline is louder then the rest' threads Image
well since youre generating them theyll all be the same volume anyway. ImageImageImage

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Post by deadly_habit » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:34 pm

trilogy is my fave
or tape 808 pack
then again i like some grit and harmonics

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests