New sound separation technique on Funky Worm

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
a_sn
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:02 pm
Contact:

Post by a_sn » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:01 pm

contakt321 wrote:You have to listen to understand - the technique they use isolates JUST the synth from Funky Worm, as I understand, you should be able to isolate any of the instruments.
Can Melodyne (or for that matter anything else) even isolate the synth within the track as it is? If so I'd really love to see that, even though I doubt it a bit ;). And yup, you can isolate anything you want to here, and more than that, I mean you can do anything even senseless stuff, you can even try to turn a sound into a whole nother unrelated sound hehe.
futures_untold wrote:Doesn't Adobe Adition / Cool Edit allow for this kinda thingywizzardry?
Yup, but it doesn't have the power of editing it with Photoshop, it's more basic ;).

User avatar
contakt321
Posts: 2053
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

Post by contakt321 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:09 pm

The next version of Melodybe, called Melodyne DNA I believe can. It can even break apart notes in chords so you change stuff from major to minor.

Insane right?

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by abZ » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:10 pm

contakt321 wrote:You have to listen to understand - the technique they use isolates JUST the synth from Funky Worm, as I understand, you should be able to isolate any of the instruments.
I know that is why I posted in the thread. Save it for later.

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by abZ » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:12 pm

A_SN wrote:
contakt321 wrote:You have to listen to understand - the technique they use isolates JUST the synth from Funky Worm, as I understand, you should be able to isolate any of the instruments.
Can Melodyne (or for that matter anything else) even isolate the synth within the track as it is? If so I'd really love to see that, even though I doubt it a bit ;). And yup, you can isolate anything you want to here, and more than that, I mean you can do anything even senseless stuff, you can even try to turn a sound into a whole nother unrelated sound hehe.
futures_untold wrote:Doesn't Adobe Adition / Cool Edit allow for this kinda thingywizzardry?
Yup, but it doesn't have the power of editing it with Photoshop, it's more basic ;).
It doesn't do that. They even tell you that you should be working on a track with a single instrument and preferably no FX. It is still pretty amazing but not that amazing. Is it ever even going to come out I wonder? It seems like the boards have been discussing that program for forever.

a_sn
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:02 pm
Contact:

Post by a_sn » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:15 pm

contakt321 wrote:The next version of Melodybe, called Melodyne DNA I believe can. It can even break apart notes in chords so you change stuff from major to minor.

Insane right?
I knew about notes in chords, it's actually not too hard to identify/separate, but any program that claims to be able to automatically separate from samples like what I did I'd like to see, because it's impossible to a certain extent i.e. I had to recreate bits of the synth that were literally gone.

paradigm_x
Posts: 2164
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am

Post by paradigm_x » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:25 pm

A_SN wrote:Surely there must be samples out there that would have been used a lot if they hadn't been "ruined" by undesirable extra sounds.
http://www.subvertcentral.com/forum/sho ... php?t=7304

:lol:

a_sn
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:02 pm
Contact:

Post by a_sn » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:29 pm

Paradigm X wrote:
A_SN wrote:Surely there must be samples out there that would have been used a lot if they hadn't been "ruined" by undesirable extra sounds.
http://www.subvertcentral.com/forum/sho ... php?t=7304

:lol:
Haha awesome! That's quite the sort of thing I had in mind. I need to grab a hold of whatever recording they're talking about.

a_sn
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:02 pm
Contact:

Post by a_sn » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:38 pm

nowaysj wrote:beep map in fl for 150 years now.
Not that I'm tired of people saying "pfft X did it before", but how does beep map come anywhere close to filtering instruments out of music?

paradigm_x
Posts: 2164
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am

Post by paradigm_x » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:47 pm

did you write this/make it ? or just good at using it/photocopy ?

Im sure someone will sort you out a copy, you can be a god in the breakdigging world !

a_sn
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:02 pm
Contact:

Post by a_sn » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:54 pm

Paradigm X wrote:did you write this/make it ? or just good at using it/photocopy ?

Im sure someone will sort you out a copy, you can be a god in the breakdigging world !
Yep I'm the one guy behind it all. I'm myself only mildly interested in break digging, I'm more interested in learning to paint my own sound, although I'd surely love to be commissioned for break sampling related tasks ;-).

a_sn
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:02 pm
Contact:

Post by a_sn » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:02 pm

nowaysj wrote:Not tryint to pft anyone's good time.

Render out the spectrogram, take it into photoshop, isolate the melodic line + harmonics, load it into the beep map. See what you get.
You try that and tell me how it compares ;-). Photosounder, in lossless mode, does lossless time-frequency domain filtering, that's why it's called lossless, cause.. it's lossless! :)

BeepMap just uses sine synthesis/noise synthesis (a non-optimal kind of) and therefore would lose greatly in quality.

User avatar
caeraphym
Posts: 698
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:20 pm

Post by caeraphym » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:07 pm

RESPECT! A_SN for knocking out this incredible piece of software, have you any other things in the pipeline or already out too?
.Image.

User avatar
contakt321
Posts: 2053
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

Post by contakt321 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:10 pm

For real, this looks awesome. Please let me know when a UB Mac version drops!

a_sn
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:02 pm
Contact:

Post by a_sn » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:22 pm

Caeraphym wrote:RESPECT! A_SN for knocking out this incredible piece of software, have you any other things in the pipeline or already out too?
Right now I'm sticking to only deving on Photosounder, the next big thing for it being higher resolution sound to image algorithms, I'm considering spin-off programs doing something specific just right, but not working on any such thing right now.
contakt321 wrote:For real, this looks awesome. Please let me know when a UB Mac version drops!
PM me your e-mail and I'll add you to the Mac mailing list

User avatar
drokkr
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Post by drokkr » Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:59 am

spent as good part of tonight talking with some mates about this...
conclusion - it's brilliant 8)

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by abZ » Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:12 am

It is defiantly brilliant. Big up for that. I am a bit disappointed to come to the conclusion it is slightly over my head :lol:

User avatar
lowpass
Posts: 2688
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: Nottingham
Contact:

Post by lowpass » Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:25 am

hi how did you get the image of the sound?

I wanna try this one out asap

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests