Skynet and Stakka synths?!
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Skynet and Stakka synths?!
I'm trying to replicate that grimy synth sound skynet and stakka used so well in most of their tunes. It's obviously detuned sawtooth's filtered but still find it hard to get any where near.
Anyone have any suggestions?
Im using massive by the way :
Heres a good example:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0i7uobo ... re=related
Anyone have any suggestions?
Im using massive by the way :
Heres a good example:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0i7uobo ... re=related
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Nope, this is where frequency splitting comes in!
By splitting your bass into 'highs mids & lows', you can treat & process each frequency band differently.
Thus, one could ensure that everything below 300Hz is mono, but put stereo effects such as chorus on the mids and highs.
Pulse Width Modualtion is something completely different, and unrelated to the stereo field. PWM is the process of changing the size between the 'peaks & troughs' of an oscillator shape as it oscillates. Traditionally one would use a pulse wave for pulse width modulation.
Hope that makes sense?
@ PWM, I wasn't saying you wanted to copy anyone, I was merely getting in my advice before this thread turned into a 'bash the wannabe copycat fest'!!!
(Cuz that does sometimes happen on DSF!) 
By splitting your bass into 'highs mids & lows', you can treat & process each frequency band differently.
Thus, one could ensure that everything below 300Hz is mono, but put stereo effects such as chorus on the mids and highs.
Pulse Width Modualtion is something completely different, and unrelated to the stereo field. PWM is the process of changing the size between the 'peaks & troughs' of an oscillator shape as it oscillates. Traditionally one would use a pulse wave for pulse width modulation.
Hope that makes sense?
@ PWM, I wasn't saying you wanted to copy anyone, I was merely getting in my advice before this thread turned into a 'bash the wannabe copycat fest'!!!
Last edited by futures_untold on Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Can you provide a clip or Youtube link to the particular bass style you're trying to achieve? That would help us deconstruct the sound so you can remake it!PMM wrote:yeh, it's more trying to get an understanding rather than trying to sound like them. I find replicate synths a great way of learning.
Im drenching my sawtooth in chorus. Still is't happening though.
Seriously tough sound to replicate
Ps, I think they start with a standard 'hoover' bass, then add chorus and a notch filter. The notch filter needs to be on the synth that is producing the bass, that way it can retrigger/sweep on every new note that is played.
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Fixed for pronounciation accuracynowaysj wrote:Oi! You fackin' wankaz.
Lots of English people don't pronounce 'er' on the end of words, replacing that simply with 'ah'. Thus, 'water' becomes 'waughtah'.
Add to this the classic glottal stop. Thus we drop 't' from 'water' too. Reading this won't do the beauty of this sound justice, but here goes.. 'Waugh'ah' or 'buh'ah' (butter)
UK English as spoken by the average man in the street is the most beautiful language know to exist!
you fucking racist bigotnowaysj wrote:^^^ Seriously, blood lot of wankers (uk accent).
jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
Soundcloud.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/
There is a youtube link in my 1st post. The sound im on about comes in around 1.05 initfutures_untold wrote:Can you provide a clip or Youtube link to the particular bass style you're trying to achieve? That would help us deconstruct the sound so you can remake it!PMM wrote:yeh, it's more trying to get an understanding rather than trying to sound like them. I find replicate synths a great way of learning.
Im drenching my sawtooth in chorus. Still is't happening though.
Seriously tough sound to replicate
Ps, I think they start with a standard 'hoover' bass, then add chorus and a notch filter. The notch filter needs to be on the synth that is producing the bass, that way it can retrigger/sweep on every new note that is played.
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests