Skynet and Stakka synths?!

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
pmm
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:09 pm

Skynet and Stakka synths?!

Post by pmm » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:21 pm

I'm trying to replicate that grimy synth sound skynet and stakka used so well in most of their tunes. It's obviously detuned sawtooth's filtered but still find it hard to get any where near.



Anyone have any suggestions?

Im using massive by the way :

Heres a good example:

|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0i7uobo ... re=related

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:28 pm

In before the 'don't bite other people's style brigade'! hehe

The first thing I noticed is that they seem to have some chorus on all their basslines.

I'd also bet they have notch filters doing things too ;)

pmm
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:09 pm

Post by pmm » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:32 pm

yeh, it's more trying to get an understanding rather than trying to sound like them. I find replicate synths a great way of learning.

Im drenching my sawtooth in chorus. Still is't happening though.

Seriously tough sound to replicate

megaladon
Posts: 191
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:41 pm

Post by megaladon » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:53 pm

I keep hearing (seemingly) contradictory things about chorus on the real low bass, is it a hazard for mixing/pressing if it's not entirely mono, or is this where pwm comes in?

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:00 pm

Nope, this is where frequency splitting comes in!

By splitting your bass into 'highs mids & lows', you can treat & process each frequency band differently.

Thus, one could ensure that everything below 300Hz is mono, but put stereo effects such as chorus on the mids and highs.

Pulse Width Modualtion is something completely different, and unrelated to the stereo field. PWM is the process of changing the size between the 'peaks & troughs' of an oscillator shape as it oscillates. Traditionally one would use a pulse wave for pulse width modulation.

Hope that makes sense?

@ PWM, I wasn't saying you wanted to copy anyone, I was merely getting in my advice before this thread turned into a 'bash the wannabe copycat fest'!!! :o :) (Cuz that does sometimes happen on DSF!) :(
Last edited by futures_untold on Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:03 pm

PMM wrote:yeh, it's more trying to get an understanding rather than trying to sound like them. I find replicate synths a great way of learning.

Im drenching my sawtooth in chorus. Still is't happening though.

Seriously tough sound to replicate
Can you provide a clip or Youtube link to the particular bass style you're trying to achieve? That would help us deconstruct the sound so you can remake it! :)

Ps, I think they start with a standard 'hoover' bass, then add chorus and a notch filter. The notch filter needs to be on the synth that is producing the bass, that way it can retrigger/sweep on every new note that is played.

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:09 pm

nowaysj wrote:Oi! You fackin' wankaz.
Fixed for pronounciation accuracy ;)

Lots of English people don't pronounce 'er' on the end of words, replacing that simply with 'ah'. Thus, 'water' becomes 'waughtah'.

Add to this the classic glottal stop. Thus we drop 't' from 'water' too. Reading this won't do the beauty of this sound justice, but here goes.. 'Waugh'ah' or 'buh'ah' (butter)

UK English as spoken by the average man in the street is the most beautiful language know to exist! :)

User avatar
DZA
Posts: 14609
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Notts

Post by DZA » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:20 pm

nowaysj wrote:^^^ Seriously, blood lot of wankers (uk accent).
you fucking racist bigot :s:
jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
Soundcloud
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/

pmm
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:09 pm

Post by pmm » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:31 pm

futures_untold wrote:
PMM wrote:yeh, it's more trying to get an understanding rather than trying to sound like them. I find replicate synths a great way of learning.

Im drenching my sawtooth in chorus. Still is't happening though.

Seriously tough sound to replicate
Can you provide a clip or Youtube link to the particular bass style you're trying to achieve? That would help us deconstruct the sound so you can remake it! :)

Ps, I think they start with a standard 'hoover' bass, then add chorus and a notch filter. The notch filter needs to be on the synth that is producing the bass, that way it can retrigger/sweep on every new note that is played.
There is a youtube link in my 1st post. The sound im on about comes in around 1.05 init :wink:

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by futures_untold » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:36 pm

Sorry, must of missed that! :o

Anyway, try this:

One oscillator on saw ---> lowpass --->

Another oscilator set on sine an octave lower.

Distort both with tube or tape distortion/compression ---> lowpass again and add chorus! :)

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests