They're all..tommate wrote:there all..
Anyway, someone sticky this muthachuffa
They're all..tommate wrote:there all..
Like I said, no worries zillion, I had fun making the track regardless and isn't that really what this is all about? Even if I'm not on the list, just participating with everyone else that entered and also having a finished track in time was cool. Sure I would of loved to see how I would of done, at least feedback, hehe, but I had fun regardless. I linked the track I made in this thread on a previous post, if cats arn't too exhausted by sitting through all the entries ( a lot of listening minutes), hehe, which I really enjoyed, then maybe you can give my track a listen as an unofficial entry.Sorry to wave-o dont really know what happened to your track. Think it might have been my fault and missed it from the list i definately downloaded the track just must have been a bit slack.
But someone had to miss out anyways because that would have made 21 tracks and virb can only hold 20.
co-sign thiscontakt321 wrote:Maybe the next one only runs for 2 weeks, voting for 1 week, and only the first 10 entries are voted upon. Because it's a shorter time period, we can do more and if people miss out they will be less upset.
Don't agree with this, never good to rush productions as then the quality would start to lack, you'd have everyone trying to finish a tune quickly to get it in first...boomstix wrote:
no time limit and the first 10 entries are accepted. as soon as they are in voting starts
It's hard on one hand, 20 is a lot of tracks to sort through. On the other, it will be difficult to limit the number of entrants without hurting the quality and fun of these contests.Rosco wrote:Don't agree with this, never good to rush productions as then the quality would start to lack, you'd have everyone trying to finish a tune quickly to get it in first...boomstix wrote:
no time limit and the first 10 entries are accepted. as soon as they are in voting starts
Also not about limiting the number of entries, the more the better, all about growing the competition, not putting a cap on it.
contakt321 wrote:It's hard on one hand, 20 is a lot of tracks to sort through. On the other, it will be difficult to limit the number of entrants without hurting the quality and fun of these contests.Rosco wrote:Don't agree with this, never good to rush productions as then the quality would start to lack, you'd have everyone trying to finish a tune quickly to get it in first...boomstix wrote:
no time limit and the first 10 entries are accepted. as soon as they are in voting starts
Also not about limiting the number of entries, the more the better, all about growing the competition, not putting a cap on it.
As long as it took I enjoyed listening through all 20 tracks.
good points, i agree that it would probably exclude some people and that's not what i wanted.Wrexile wrote:Agreed Rosco & contakt.
If it were to be done the way boomstix suggested it would end up unintentionally rejecting people's tracks who haven't had chance to enter theirs in previous sessions, which we don't want.
If the same 10 people keep doing it over and over it's a lil' bit unfair and we could miss out on some wicked tunes
I reckon the present way is good but I see what yer getting at...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests