Forum Reason collab?

foamo · Post by **foamo** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:37 pm

anyone up for doing a reason collab or summin?

maybe get a load of ppl together and each person is allowed 1 sequencer track each, and is allowed to create lil edits of other ppls bits here n there.. maybe get a few ppl together.. or two teams?

mite be fun, not too serious. reason .rns files are proper easy to pass round, and self contain etc.

put your name down if your up for it

flippo · Post by **flippo** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:16 pm

yeh why not, I'm up for it. Might be a bit of a tnuc to organise, could get messy if people have differnt versions. Have to have a pretty tight schedule and stick to it to make sure we eont end up with 8 different half finished versions.

measure d · Post by **measure d** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:37 am

sounds cool, count me in. PM me with details if it happens. If not Im still down to collab.

posh · Post by **posh** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:36 pm

sounds like a plan if i can get my reason styles up to scratch.

parson · Post by **parson** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:54 pm

i'll play with the file some

jack sparrow1 · Post by **jack sparrow1** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:46 pm

room for a sparrow??

username taken · Post by **username taken** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:23 am

yeah i'm up for it too. and that idea about each person getting a single sequencer track is nice.

reason 3 right?

deapoh · Post by **deapoh** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:25 am

I'm on this, two teams would be fun, like a lil competition with no prize lol.

fullyrecordingz · Post by **fullyrecordingz** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:03 pm

`sounds kool. how will it work tho, thats the thing. just passin reason files round the net?

Rob H · Post by **Rob H** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:35 pm

dont mean to put a dampener on this but didnt the old rinse forums have a similar topic floating about? I seem to remember nothing ever actually happenin really. If anything does happen id be up to collab tho

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:55 pm

i guess what we need to do is start the thing before we can pass it around

is somebody gonna volunteer to kick this thing off?

parson · Post by **parson** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:56 pm

here's what i think

it should be open source

like work on the file for a bit, then post the rns on the forum

then somebody else can work on it and post up the rns

if somebody doesn't wanna fuck with a new version because somebody fucked it up real bad then we can try to fuck with an older version

OPEN SOURCE DUBSTEP

ideally we could get a few decent versions done or maybe even a few different tunes

we need a name for the forum collective

emu · Post by **emu** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:05 pm

im up for it

username taken · Post by **username taken** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:59 am

i think not using any refills and samples other than the default reason's ones would be better and easier for us to share the .rns files.

maybe we should be allowed to use wav samples as long as you save self contained

dust shop · Post by **dust shop** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:54 pm

count me in

open source dubstep is a cool concept!
& yeah maybe it's easier not to use soundbanks & refills?
btw is there major differences between version 2.5 & 3???

machine + barbarian · Post by **machine + barbarian** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:00 pm

did this get off the ground, would be up for figuring, open source music is a cool idea, i'm up for posting the first start if its agreable

bowzer · Post by **bowzer** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:52 pm

yea count me in too - might be a good learning experience!

in reply about reason 2.5 and 3... version 3 has the combinator which is very useful for combining instruments that have lots of devices, into one, so it takes up less visual space. It also allows you to do some patching things you couldn't of done before. also, theres some new eq/compression/maximizer devices, which are handy.

i'd say we use version 3, its been out long enough now - and no refills, but self contained samples would be nice.

posh · Post by **posh** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:00 pm

yer play with the default reason's sample and keep it simple if it works out bigger thigs to come. using the default reason's sample should test ur style anyway.

parson · Post by **parson** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:11 pm

i say anything should be fine so long as its self contained

that means no refills other than factory soundbank/orkester

and i'm thinking we should agree on 3.0

parson · Post by **parson** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:11 pm

Machine + Barbarian wrote:did this get off the ground, would be up for figuring, open source music is a cool idea, i'm up for posting the first start if its agreable

dooo it

Forum Reason collab?

Forum Reason collab?

Who is online