Korg Electrib SX or MX?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Korg Electrib SX or MX?
Cant decide on MX or SX ???
Id like the sampling ability of the SX so that I can eventually take the samples from my tunes and perform live
..but i fear that the recording of samples would initially be long and piss me off - thus causing the hardware to gather dust
Like the look of the MX as i think it would be quicker off the mark creatively
anyone use one? how are you finding it?
Id like the sampling ability of the SX so that I can eventually take the samples from my tunes and perform live
..but i fear that the recording of samples would initially be long and piss me off - thus causing the hardware to gather dust
Like the look of the MX as i think it would be quicker off the mark creatively
anyone use one? how are you finding it?
I had an mx a few years back. Theyre pretty good, although the only drawbacks for me, was -
1, Its a step sequencer - loooonng to get the hang of!
2,VERY limited, as in you only have 5 synth parts per track, and 8 or so drum parts
Thats why i moved to software, much more freedom to do what you want.
1, Its a step sequencer - loooonng to get the hang of!
2,VERY limited, as in you only have 5 synth parts per track, and 8 or so drum parts
Thats why i moved to software, much more freedom to do what you want.
when i get a midi setup i'll be incorporating my emx-1 as an external sound source. it's capable of some good sounds (limited drums, but you can always use effects and shit to change them up a bit). i was going to sell it but after playing around with it a bit more, realized the joy of synthesizing sounds on your own and figuring things out. sometimes i wonder if i'd have preferred an sx, though.
kind of looking fwd to the step sequencer as I was brought up on Rebirth1, Its a step sequencer - loooonng to get the hang of!
sounds like most dubstep tracks to be honest2,VERY limited, as in you only have 5 synth parts per track, and 8 or so drum parts

also loving the fact that its quite limited - just want to get creative with this type of thing and quickly
just getting load of ideas about sampling, resampling - routing audo into it etc
also have an evolver as well and have been looking for something like this to hook up to it.
-
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:05 am
i preferred emx just because i didn't feel like i needed the limited sampling functionality of the esx. but that is only my opinion. i happen to like the workflow on the emx but i haven't touched one in ages. if you can try one out possibly that would be great because it all comes down to the sounds and wheter you like them or not.
look up youtube videos and sound demos and such if you can't get a hold of one to test out.
it is also refreshing to not have unlimited resources at your fingertips (a la software) as it helps you to work more creatively.
look up youtube videos and sound demos and such if you can't get a hold of one to test out.
it is also refreshing to not have unlimited resources at your fingertips (a la software) as it helps you to work more creatively.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests