MJ Cole - Sincere (Nero Remix)
wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tuneNERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:yeah I think it should be replaced with the word 'wobble', just so that all good producers know to keep the fuck away from itNERO - Dan wrote:Well I'd say its usually a square wave with a 'squeltchy' resonant lfo on it playing a pattern that accentuates the feeling of wobbling around. I think what you're doing is confusing lfo with wobble. Or do you think that synthesizers should start replacing lfo with the word 'wobble'?String wrote:You've made dnb for long enough, i know you know what it is!NERO - Dan wrote: What is a wobble?
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!String wrote:wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tuneNERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:yeah I think it should be replaced with the word 'wobble', just so that all good producers know to keep the fuck away from itNERO - Dan wrote:Well I'd say its usually a square wave with a 'squeltchy' resonant lfo on it playing a pattern that accentuates the feeling of wobbling around. I think what you're doing is confusing lfo with wobble. Or do you think that synthesizers should start replacing lfo with the word 'wobble'?String wrote: You've made dnb for long enough, i know you know what it is!
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
Last edited by rob sparx on Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
When people are talking about wobble in this thread I think they are referring to the triplets bass pattern, which is as overused as LFO lines in some parts of dubstep at the moment (and for the past god knows how long).Rob Sparx wrote:There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
Haunted was made 4 years ago, not sure why people are still ripping it off tbh.
You'd think that when planning a rip off of another tune you'd try to pick one that hasn't been ripped off 1000 times already? But then I guess these wobble/triplet producers don't have much imagination.bandshell wrote:People are always going to rip off something good, doesn't matter how old it is.
nah you got me wrong, i said DECENT producers should stay away from wobbleRob Sparx wrote:There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!String wrote:wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tuneNERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:yeah I think it should be replaced with the word 'wobble', just so that all good producers know to keep the fuck away from itNERO - Dan wrote: Well I'd say its usually a square wave with a 'squeltchy' resonant lfo on it playing a pattern that accentuates the feeling of wobbling around. I think what you're doing is confusing lfo with wobble. Or do you think that synthesizers should start replacing lfo with the word 'wobble'?
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
and as for haunted, well, i prefer the flip side
pretty much sums it updubstee wrote: Haunted was made 4 years ago, not sure why people are still ripping it off tbh.
hahaha This!String wrote:wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tuneNERO - Dan wrote:
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
GMT
You should appreciate wobble as you are clearly a fucking retard in suggesting producers shouldn't use LFOs - fuck right off!!String wrote:nah you got me wrong, i said DECENT producers should stay away from wobbleRob Sparx wrote:There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!String wrote:wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tuneNERO - Dan wrote:String wrote: yeah I think it should be replaced with the word 'wobble', just so that all good producers know to keep the fuck away from it
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
and as for haunted, well, i prefer the flip side
pretty much sums it updubstee wrote: Haunted was made 4 years ago, not sure why people are still ripping it off tbh.
why should i appreciate wobble, its fucking shit and is made by idiots, no soul, no substanceRob Sparx wrote:You should appreciate wobble as you are clearly a fucking retard in suggesting producers shouldn't use LFOs - fuck right off!!String wrote:nah you got me wrong, i said DECENT producers should stay away from wobbleRob Sparx wrote:There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!String wrote:wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tuneNERO - Dan wrote:
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
and as for haunted, well, i prefer the flip side
pretty much sums it updubstee wrote: Haunted was made 4 years ago, not sure why people are still ripping it off tbh.
so fuck off yourself
-
subonedubstep
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:35 pm
Missing the point here I think Rob... the complaint isn't about using LFOs per se, it's the ubiquitous trend of using a mid range synth line with a simple low pass cutoff LFO on it, over the top of a sub and a half step beat. Or just a triplets synth/sub line with the same sort of beat, as in this remix. It's SUCH a cliche, and it's SO unimaginative. People are more than justified in rallying against it.Rob Sparx wrote:You should appreciate wobble as you are clearly a fucking retard in suggesting producers shouldn't use LFOs - fuck right off!!
-
.rudetone.
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 7:45 pm
- Location: York
stanton wrote:Even the last DMZ seemed to be full of tunes with that generic dnb kick drum build up to generic drop (duh-duh-duh-duh-duhduhduhduhduhduhduhduh----drop), each to their own and all that but isn't it all getting a bit fucking dull and predictable now?
Noticed this a lot and yes, it is getting VERY fucking dull and predictable now...to the point that I am sick of a lot of 'Dubstep'.
Don't mind that Nero remix, nothing special but not worth a slating..and I find the oldies kicking off about it quite funny.
It doesn'tduck wrote:don't really get this... how does a remix "ruin" the original tune.
Last edited by .rudetone. on Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
nakedlunch
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:45 pm
- Location: http://lnk.ms/0KSYS
Trying to Remix Sincerebandshell wrote:
I suggest everyone go off and write a haiku,
Is like picking up a turd
From the clean end.
http://www.surus.co.uk/naked-lunch/
http://www.youtube.com/user/mickylunch
http://soundcloud.com/nakedlunch
Forthcoming in 2013 - Kevin McPhee , Stingray313 , Endian ,Nubian Mindz...
http://www.youtube.com/user/mickylunch
http://soundcloud.com/nakedlunch
Forthcoming in 2013 - Kevin McPhee , Stingray313 , Endian ,Nubian Mindz...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests