Just saw V for Vendetta....
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
-
masstronaut
- Posts: 1067
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:37 pm
Yes, two of the best bits for me. Stephen Fry's character (although he seems out of character at that moment) relates that first line direct to camera, directly at the viewer. It's almost seperate from the rest of the film. Nice try on the part of the film makers to break through the medium, which of course they realise will do it's best to subsume any genuine message of dissent.Bedward wrote:but how good is it to have so much blatant dissent on the silver screen!
"their is something seriously wrong with this country."
bloody right there is!
and the line which, for me, redeemed the film almost entirely,
"people should not be afraid of their governments,
governments should be afraid of the people."
It's definitely better than From Hell. But what isn't.
Anyway, like I said on another thread, looking forward to The 1812 Overture (Loefah Refix) midnight at DMZ tomorrow, followed by some big fireworks
there's a coupla chords just before the main section starts up that absolutely smash it.masstronaut wrote: Anyway, like I said on another thread, looking forward to The 1812 Overture (Loefah Refix) midnight at DMZ tomorrow, followed by some big fireworks
side note: in the comic it was all about beethoven's 5th.
watched it again last night and noticed that a lot of interesting references are in there, but not over-played.
cheeky winks to the underground.
much like the 1st matrix.
and portman does do a stirling job, despite the occasional eliza doolittle moment.
it's so very nearly a brilliant classic film.
-
masstronaut
- Posts: 1067
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:37 pm
yeah i know about frank miller i and i know its a faithful adaptation and that fans were not upset about the adaptation and all that goes to show is that faithful adaptation is a bad idea
there has gotta be some changes from the page to the screen for the movie to work
i truly did not enjoy watching sin city
there has gotta be some changes from the page to the screen for the movie to work
i truly did not enjoy watching sin city
i am glad i saw Vendetta. it was inspiring in a cheesy way, though from the get-go i expected it to be corny and to have bit of that 'eliza doolittle' action going on.. it's hollywood 
maybe she could have stood to do a bit more of the rain in spain goes mainly on the plains, but either way she's cute and endearing so she sold the part
seems alan moore often gets screwed on these adaptations, while miller is often pleased. and in most regards, adaptations of miller's work are faithful and almost as spot-on as they can be. i haven't read any of these comics, but i'm just speaking from what i've read in panel discussions and interviews with the artists and filmmakers.
and well, it seems as though Warners has made a place for themselves at comic con. don't see why they'd have any reason to leave now. miller is pleased with the adaptation of his 300, and indeed snyder has created a shot-for-shot film [albeit some minor differences in the dialogue and an additional narrative]. i'm looking forward to seeing this next one.
maybe she could have stood to do a bit more of the rain in spain goes mainly on the plains, but either way she's cute and endearing so she sold the part
seems alan moore often gets screwed on these adaptations, while miller is often pleased. and in most regards, adaptations of miller's work are faithful and almost as spot-on as they can be. i haven't read any of these comics, but i'm just speaking from what i've read in panel discussions and interviews with the artists and filmmakers.
and well, it seems as though Warners has made a place for themselves at comic con. don't see why they'd have any reason to leave now. miller is pleased with the adaptation of his 300, and indeed snyder has created a shot-for-shot film [albeit some minor differences in the dialogue and an additional narrative]. i'm looking forward to seeing this next one.
Last edited by ands on Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
moore on adaptations of his films
http://www.mtv.com/shared/movies/interv ... an_060315/
http://www.mtv.com/shared/movies/interv ... an_060315/
"V for Vendetta" was specifically about things like fascism and anarchy.
Those words, "fascism" and "anarchy," occur nowhere in the film. It's been turned into a Bush-era parable by people too timid to set a political satire in their own country.
George Clooney's being attacked for making ["Good Night, and Good Luck"], but he still had the nerve to make it. Presumably it's not illegal — not yet anyway — to express dissenting opinions in the land of free? So perhaps it would have been better for everybody if the Wachowski brothers had done something set in America, and instead of a hero who dresses up as Guy Fawkes, they could have had him dressed as Paul Revere. It could have worked.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
