Sifres wrote:bass hertz wrote:nothing says I love my wife more than sharing her with all my friends.
really... I'm promoting women.
yeah mate... valid... argument...

But I get it... You're angry... Just saying there is a good side to it too...
Point is the industry has done nothing but try to squeeze the people out of their cash.
Let me finish my mixtape point to illustrate this. In holland we have an organisation called BUMA STEMRA, they represent the combined artists. Similar to the RIAA I guess.
They can send you a takedown notice for putting
your own music on your website. Sad but true. They will, and are capable doing so by law. They will come down 3x as hard if it is a site hosting mixtapes that are not originaly from the DJ himself. So any effort hosting a mixtape site in Holland is pointless.
So yes... It is piracy. Legaly that is. The point that everybody (even the dj's themselves) think it's alright doesn't change that.
Keep in mind also you are generating money for Soundcloud, Megaupload, Rapidshare etc,
Then in holland you have the SENA. They are a sister organisation to the BUMA. They are the ones that charge discotheques and
DJ's. They will even charge livesets. Hosting a 2000 people
free rave in a legal location, will result in a 3000 euro bill. Even if you prove that it was 100% bands and liveacts. I have seen people getting in serious debts over this.
This is all good you say? Money flows to the artists? Yeah... If your music is played on the radio and is from sony/virgin it is. But these people charge by the track, regardless if you are affiliated. Money get's devided because at a couple of bars they will have listening computers stationed, so they can spot trends...
Lone Dubstep DJ get's paid? Nah... But get's charged for playing his own tracks.
These people also lost about 400mln euro's because of bad investments.
FUCK the industry. I will buy from independant labels but I have no problem downloading the latest Eminem album. NONE...