

http://www.it247.com/product/1/XXTSUE42 ... id=s262444


I know people who are releasing quality music on computers way, way worse.Eastern Electrics wrote:just another netbook.
imo useless for production/ djing with these specs:
1024x600 resolution
Atom 1,6 GHZ CPU
i tried on my msi wind (same specs, reason/cubase/samplitude) -> fail
Serox wrote:I know people who are releasing quality music on computers way, way worse.Eastern Electrics wrote:just another netbook.
imo useless for production/ djing with these specs:
1024x600 resolution
Atom 1,6 GHZ CPU
i tried on my msi wind (same specs, reason/cubase/samplitude) -> fail
If you know how to bounce your audio you do not need to work with 10 VSTS on the go.
If the computer is cheap I do not care if it goes to ultra high resolutions. The point on this machine is for it to be used as a 2nd mobile computer!
Playing tunes on a laptop is not DJing btw.
BREAKSBARON wrote:I own a Netbook, what I would like to know, is if anyone has used one for Dj'ing, with 'Serato' or 'Torq'.
The size of the machines are superb, I just wanna know if I can Dj with one.

no doubt about that.Serox wrote: I know people who are releasing quality music on computers way, way worse.
true that. i tried with reason 4.0 (any vst´s at all) and it just didnt feel comfortable. even bouncing down single tracks isnt that kind of fun with an atom processor as you cant compare the "Atom-1,6Ghz" to a "Athlon/Pentium/Core2-1,6Ghz" . give it a try.Serox wrote: If you know how to bounce your audio you do not need to work with 10 VSTS on the go.
the resolution doesnt even match the standard 1024x768 whats the reference for the most program-windows, dialogue boxes and stuff like that. this can be a pain in the arse. it´s not about looking good with higher resolutions but about providing functionality to the software.Serox wrote: If the computer is cheap I do not care if it goes to ultra high resolutions.
i tried to point in the serato direction. people often ask about djing (digi-vinyl) on netbooks. serato as an example cant be used on such low resolutions without dragging the whole screen up and down.Serox wrote: Playing tunes on a laptop is not DJing btw.
Depone wrote:serox. whats your pain for laptop dj's? really sounds quite pretentious. its all about the end result. get off your high horse
+1Depone wrote:serox. whats your pain for laptop dj's? really sounds quite pretentious. its all about the end result. get off your high horse
| Facebook Page | Twitter | Soundcloud |cloak and dagger wrote:number of posts on dsf = directly proportional to importance in the dubstep scene
playing music on ur laptop is not DJing! I know people who can get some good results from digital setups but it is not DJing.Depone wrote:serox. whats your pain for laptop dj's? really sounds quite pretentious. its all about the end result. get off your high horse
Making music on a laptop is not music too, right?Serox wrote:playing music on ur laptop is not DJing! I know people who can get some good results from digital setups but it is not DJing.Depone wrote:serox. whats your pain for laptop dj's? really sounds quite pretentious. its all about the end result. get off your high horse
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests