converting .wav to .mp3 !!!!!!!

abZ · Post by **abZ** » Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:32 pm

Magnetron, Sputtering wrote:WTF is wrong with iTunes?

Whats that?

3za · Post by **3za** » Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:39 pm

abZ wrote:
Magnetron, Sputtering wrote:WTF is wrong with iTunes?
Whats that?

your joking

i dont use the encoder (i use lame) but its the only app i will listen to music in, with the sound enhancer (sound musher) off and the eq (cliper) off. then it sounds good why they think that pro mastered tracks sound better when fucked with i dont know

abZ · Post by **abZ** » Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:49 pm

I have never seen or used iTunes. I won't even install an Apple program on my computer. I used Winamp for forever but lately I have been digging Fubar.

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:00 am

spacewagon · Post by **spacewagon** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:15 am

Magnetron, Sputtering wrote:WTF is wrong with iTunes?

I was thinking the same thing..

bugsky · Post by **bugsky** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:36 am

abZ wrote:I have never seen or used iTunes. I won't even install an Apple program on my computer. I used Winamp for forever but lately I have been digging Fubar.

Foobar is the dog's vagina. I swear by it.

wormcode · Post by **wormcode** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:53 am

bugsky wrote:
abZ wrote:I have never seen or used iTunes. I won't even install an Apple program on my computer. I used Winamp for forever but lately I have been digging Fubar.
Foobar is the dog's vagina. I swear by it.

Yeah man Foobars nice too, but I still run Winamp 2.95. It's just right imo, put a nice skin on it and don't have to worry about anything else. The newer versions seem to want to do everything, even burn CD's, and take up lots of memory... too bloated for my tastes. However, iTunes is the king of the bloat imo! I can't see how people use it as their default media player, but whatever works for ya! Anyone remember Kjofol or Sonique hehe.

pshtt · Post by **pshtt** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:00 am

ASCII wrote:
pshtt wrote:lame -b 320 -m s -q 0
How do you get -q 0? The highest I can get is -q 2

I'm using LAME3.98.2 btw

Hmm... I still use LAME 3.97 but I've just tried converting a WAV file using LAME 3.98 and it created an MP3 file with quality index of 60 (which is -q 0)

abZ · Post by **abZ** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:08 pm

nowaysj wrote:whats all this -q bizzness?

That is making me feel a little dumb at the moment as well tbh.

3za · Post by **3za** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:50 pm

nowaysj wrote:Dood, I've got a -q of 7.1, so suck it.

ya mang i had my -q @ 7.1 but i changed to 7.1768938795525 and i found i got much better wub wubs and wob wobs

i aint got a clue what -q but would like to know

HAACK · Post by **HAACK** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:30 am

Deadly Habit wrote:
Osky wrote:
fixed

hahaha

proper on the alpaca edit.

dat_wolves_boy · Post by **dat_wolves_boy** » Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:52 pm

Itunes all the way!
it still leaves the file quite large but the quality's awesome

deadly_habit · Post by **deadly_habit** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:24 am

itunes doesnt use lame as default mp3 encoder
it uses some shit that colos the sound which is horrid
avoid at all costs

converting .wav to .mp3 !!!!!!!

Who is online