abletons workflow vs everything else
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- wayoftheworld
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: Solitude, United States
abletons workflow vs everything else
i know there's been an annoying amount of ableton questions and i've spent a good bit of time looking thru them but im specifically wondering why abletons workflow seems to get so much praise, whereas something like fl studio (what im currently using) is perhaps counter productive because of how linear it is? what is so different with ableton versus all the other daws?
and was also wondering if anyone had any tips to get that wonky, underwatery bleepy sound (think rustie). any help appreciated!
and was also wondering if anyone had any tips to get that wonky, underwatery bleepy sound (think rustie). any help appreciated!
- wayoftheworld
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: Solitude, United States
yea fl is great but i can't help but feel im missing out on something with ableton. perhaps i dont understand it correctly but it seems ableton is more intuitive because you're not using pattern blocks/loops like a standard daw.....i understand live is geared towards performing live, but what is it that makes the program so intuitive and diferent?3za wrote:Fl Studio ftw
im sick of all this ableton love on here
Man, use what you have. They are all just tools to get your musical ideas out. I know people that have made brilliant records just using fruity loops or just using Reason.3za wrote:Fl Studio ftw
im sick of all this ableton love on here
With that said, after using a few different DAW's, that Ableton's workflow allows me to focus more on musical problems rather than technical problems in less time.
But yeah, just use what you have and make beats...
- wayoftheworld
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: Solitude, United States
you're right that they're all just tools and that its not the software its what you do with it blah blah, but i'm curious as to why live's workflow gets so much praise over other daws and how exactly is it different. it does get a bit frustrating after a while with fl using pattern blocks and clips....its all a bit too linear at times, so if there's something else out there like live that seems to get around this problem, it's definetly something i'd be interested in looking into moreMKS wrote:Man, use what you have. They are all just tools to get your musical ideas out. I know people that have made brilliant records just using fruity loops or just using Reason.3za wrote:Fl Studio ftw
im sick of all this ableton love on here
With that said, after using a few different DAW's, that Ableton's workflow allows me to focus more on musical problems rather than technical problems in less time.
But yeah, just use what you have and make beats...
Well, with the workflow you can be as linear as you want and as abstract as you want. Shit, I'll just plug my bass in and jam and mess with the audio later. I don't know if I can list all of the things right now, but it sounds like you're interested, just try it out. Maybe someone else here can elaborate on the workflow more.wayoftheworld wrote:you're right that they're all just tools and that its not the software its what you do with it blah blah, but i'm curious as to why live's workflow gets so much praise over other daws and how exactly is it different. it does get a bit frustrating after a while with fl using pattern blocks and clips....its all a bit too linear at times, so if there's something else out there like live that seems to get around this problem, it's definetly something i'd be interested in looking into moreMKS wrote:Man, use what you have. They are all just tools to get your musical ideas out. I know people that have made brilliant records just using fruity loops or just using Reason.3za wrote:Fl Studio ftw
im sick of all this ableton love on here
With that said, after using a few different DAW's, that Ableton's workflow allows me to focus more on musical problems rather than technical problems in less time.
But yeah, just use what you have and make beats...
EZ
Lurq wrote:Basically if you want to work in a non-conventional ass hat backward way, regurgitate the company's line all over the internets, then ableton is for you.
Oooo look at me, I use a DAW that looks like a bunch of kid blocks made by phisher price. I'm so different and creative.

You can get a pretty quick work flow with anything if you put the time in. I haven't spent significant time with any other app beside Reason and Ableton. Things are way quicker in Live for me because of the fact I don't need to run side applications with it such as Recycle, Sound Fordge and Acid, which is what I had to do! Resizing windows with the mouse is quicker once you get used to it. The fact you don't have to devise work arounds for features that Reason simply doesn't have. Switching tool tips in Reason pisses me off too. There is a pencil tool in Ableton but you don't even need to use it. It is there if you want it though, other than that one tool tip. I don't know about the work flow of other apps because I never got good enough with anything else to really get quick.
-
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
- Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
- Contact:
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
because its like 5 programs rolled into one
check out the "adaptive grid" instead of the lines disappearing when you zoom out to place sounds and midi, it adjusts relatively so the grid zoomed out is at 1 bar and fully zoomed in would be at like 1/16 or something. this gets rid of a LOT of pain of other programs
just go watch some videos on it
check out Tom Cosm's vids
check out youtube
not really something that somebody can explain to you with out showing or just time spent experiementing. i assure you there is a reason why ableton is so popular, its not some meritless b/s like the top 40 songs in the billboard chart...
check out the "adaptive grid" instead of the lines disappearing when you zoom out to place sounds and midi, it adjusts relatively so the grid zoomed out is at 1 bar and fully zoomed in would be at like 1/16 or something. this gets rid of a LOT of pain of other programs
just go watch some videos on it
check out Tom Cosm's vids
check out youtube
not really something that somebody can explain to you with out showing or just time spent experiementing. i assure you there is a reason why ableton is so popular, its not some meritless b/s like the top 40 songs in the billboard chart...
I used FL as my main DAW for many years, then switched to Live 7 about a year ago.
At first, I kept on making my beats in FL and then exporting as WAV and arranging in Live. After a while I stopped using FL altogether and made everything in Live.
The main thing that drew me to Live is that I think its better for arrangement. What I mean is, that in Live its very easy to move around big sections of your project, including automation, MIDI parts etc. For example, say you decide that your outro would actually sound better as an intro and you want to move the whole 8 bars including automation. In my experience this is not so easy in FL (although maybe its improved in the newest version, I haven't tried it). Especially when it comes to the automation, I hit a brick wall in FL when it comes to moving sections of my tune around.
Live has also saved me HEAPS of time in setting up midi controllers, audio interfaces etc. If you want to quickly record some audio directly into your project, or tap out something on your midi controller, Live is miles ahead in this area. In FL I found myself spending more time setting things up then actually making music, and hardly used my MIDI controller because it was too complicated to get it working properly.
I do think FL has strong points, its very good for intricate drum programming (maybe even better than Live), the sample browser is perfect, and the 3x OSC is fantastic for bass. But if you're talking about workflow, the interface in Live has definitely got a more intuitive, 'drag & drop' feel to it.
I also agree with the previous comment that Live is rolling 5 programs into one, I've stopped using a WAV editor for cutting up samples because now I can do that right on the 'canvas', in the context of the tune itself! I can also use the exact same software for live sets that I used to make the tunes, brilliant!!
One last thing, Live has also saved me a lot of time because it works on both Mac & PC (and is identical on each). If you use the same plugins on both platforms, your Live projects carry across perfectly. This isn't useful for everyone though.
At first, I kept on making my beats in FL and then exporting as WAV and arranging in Live. After a while I stopped using FL altogether and made everything in Live.
The main thing that drew me to Live is that I think its better for arrangement. What I mean is, that in Live its very easy to move around big sections of your project, including automation, MIDI parts etc. For example, say you decide that your outro would actually sound better as an intro and you want to move the whole 8 bars including automation. In my experience this is not so easy in FL (although maybe its improved in the newest version, I haven't tried it). Especially when it comes to the automation, I hit a brick wall in FL when it comes to moving sections of my tune around.
Live has also saved me HEAPS of time in setting up midi controllers, audio interfaces etc. If you want to quickly record some audio directly into your project, or tap out something on your midi controller, Live is miles ahead in this area. In FL I found myself spending more time setting things up then actually making music, and hardly used my MIDI controller because it was too complicated to get it working properly.
I do think FL has strong points, its very good for intricate drum programming (maybe even better than Live), the sample browser is perfect, and the 3x OSC is fantastic for bass. But if you're talking about workflow, the interface in Live has definitely got a more intuitive, 'drag & drop' feel to it.
I also agree with the previous comment that Live is rolling 5 programs into one, I've stopped using a WAV editor for cutting up samples because now I can do that right on the 'canvas', in the context of the tune itself! I can also use the exact same software for live sets that I used to make the tunes, brilliant!!
One last thing, Live has also saved me a lot of time because it works on both Mac & PC (and is identical on each). If you use the same plugins on both platforms, your Live projects carry across perfectly. This isn't useful for everyone though.
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
- wayoftheworld
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: Solitude, United States
i like both live AND fl, you guys are a bit wonky in the head
\/ exactly
\/ exactly
Last edited by jsilver on Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: abletons workflow vs everything else
real time sample browsing that automatically warps to tempowayoftheworld wrote:i know there's been an annoying amount of ableton questions and i've spent a good bit of time looking thru them but im specifically wondering why abletons workflow seems to get so much praise!
the way it handles audio is just great
- youthful_implants
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
- Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests