SD5 wrote:Many risks expose women to rape
and rape exposes them to pregnancy
which is potentially life-threatening for two beings.
Women tend to need cooperatively-structured societies to avoid being exposed to such risks, so are, sensibly, more inclined to conform or seek the herd for protection.
Always exceptions but you don't find a lot of women sleeping under bridges.
And even when women follow avant-garde movements, I note that many conform to the tenets of that subculture or are instrumental in creating the mores that identify that subculture, and so their comfort-zone..
but this view will seem too proscriptive to some
that's a very interesting theory
I actually think that it may not be the case that women are not into
underground music but that perhaps women in general are not into
negative music
my reasoning is thus:
I have been to a few Krautrock gigs and there seems to be a lot of women, even as much as men. If you look at say archive Can footage, there are loads of women, Krautrock was experimental but hardly dark or negative, also it was based on positive ldeals (and equality)
Noise, Doom, and Dubstep in its infancy were/are all genres based around varying degrees of negativity. Hardly any women into these genres.
Dubstep these days has grown to include more rhythm, more 'funky' elements, more female elements. You could even say the rave/jumpup element has helped in this regard (drugs hold no sex boundaries) Thus loads more women at raves.
Now I'm not saying this is because women don't get depressed or feel shit. More to do with the fact that 'the male' seems to have more of a need to inflict his personal punishment on the world, to let others know his pain. This is true in all males, knowingly or not, whereas women seem to keep this negativity inside and deal with it internally.
I'm not philisophical expert so feel free to find holes in my argument I'm just musing on some thoughts there.
what is of value and wisdom for one man seems nonsense to another.