Boring song structures

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
gravity
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:31 pm

Post by gravity » Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:34 am

lots of stuff is made simply to smash dancefloors, which unfortunately means being predictable a lot of the time (dunno why, its almost like producers underestimate the intelligence of clubbers...) also it makes life easier for the dj, which i also think is a bit of a cop out since the tnuc is getting paid to play records anyway, so at least give him something a bit more challenging.

you dont need to make a track unmixable to be more interesting, you can actually do quite a lot with the standard 4/4 8 bar chunks type of structure. i normally respect people who do so a lot more than run of the mill dance-fodder tbh.

emef
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:09 pm
Contact:

Post by emef » Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:03 pm

ill-esha wrote:it's because so many people making tunes are kids fucking around with vsts and not musicians.

no disrespect, but maybe someone should make a "music theory" plugin for them.

OMG I JUST LEARNED HOW TO ARRANGE COUNTERPOINT MELODIES AND EMPLOY PLAGAL CADENCES!
its these 'kids' though that bring a lot of the fresh shit to music

given the choice i'd rather check some silly tune a 'kid' made than some music theory spouting duffer

mico viejo
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:22 pm

Post by mico viejo » Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:10 pm

emef wrote:
ill-esha wrote:it's because so many people making tunes are kids fucking around with vsts and not musicians.

no disrespect, but maybe someone should make a "music theory" plugin for them.

OMG I JUST LEARNED HOW TO ARRANGE COUNTERPOINT MELODIES AND EMPLOY PLAGAL CADENCES!
its these 'kids' though that bring a lot of the fresh shit to music

given the choice i'd rather check some silly tune a 'kid' made than some music theory spouting duffer
actually 100 percent on point. fuck it, fools can make as many predictable arrangements as they want as long as a few kids keep pushin things 4ward...

User avatar
therapist
Posts: 3074
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:38 pm

Post by therapist » Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:14 pm

I'm not saying there isn't decent, creative stuff out there and I don't need to go looking for it, I'm asking don't the producers themselves get so bored of basically trying to recreate other people's tunes.

I've said that already, but I'm not sure everyone here can read properly.

User avatar
hurlingdervish
Posts: 2971
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm

Post by hurlingdervish » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:01 pm

emef wrote:
ill-esha wrote:it's because so many people making tunes are kids fucking around with vsts and not musicians.

no disrespect, but maybe someone should make a "music theory" plugin for them.

OMG I JUST LEARNED HOW TO ARRANGE COUNTERPOINT MELODIES AND EMPLOY PLAGAL CADENCES!
its these 'kids' though that bring a lot of the fresh shit to music

given the choice i'd rather check some silly tune a 'kid' made than some music theory spouting duffer
yea man i would rather listen to noise than music


oh wait no i wouldnt.


you're a musician. learn music theory, even if its just to forget about it after.
Last edited by hurlingdervish on Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
decree
Posts: 553
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Post by decree » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:28 pm

wow this got really blown out of proporation ahhahaha


funny :P :twisted:

User avatar
my_fickle_eye
Posts: 415
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:50 pm
Location: bangor and brighton
Contact:

Post by my_fickle_eye » Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:35 am

dont people make mixdowns for radio and mixdowns for a dj? If a tune is 4/4 should be easy for a dj :|

User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan

Post by youthful_implants » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:55 am

gravity wrote:lots of stuff is made simply to smash dancefloors, which unfortunately means being predictable a lot of the time (dunno why, its almost like producers underestimate the intelligence of clubbers...) also it makes life easier for the dj, which i also think is a bit of a cop out since the tnuc is getting paid to play records anyway, so at least give him something a bit more challenging.

you dont need to make a track unmixable to be more interesting, you can actually do quite a lot with the standard 4/4 8 bar chunks type of structure. i normally respect people who do so a lot more than run of the mill dance-fodder tbh.
agree.
720bass.com | Strontium | Future Perfect

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD
TWITTER
TUMBLR

slothrop
Posts: 2655
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:59 am

Post by slothrop » Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:15 pm

Simon Reynolds quotes Goldie - "what's interesting is trying to be musical and mixable" - ie a lot of great music comes out of the creative tension between the desire to fuck with peoples heads and the imperative to make them dance so your tunes get played out and you get the chance to fuck with their heads. It kind of pulls it into a balance where really cool things can happen.

User avatar
jolly wailer
Posts: 3081
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:45 am
Location: Planet Earth, Yeah?

Post by jolly wailer » Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:23 pm

^^ yes this!


I dont get people who come on this board talking about doing odd time tracks and tempo shifts all over the place


no one is going to feel that, you're purposely messing with the balance of the tune


you can still be fresh without completely throwing the map out and reinventing the wheel
myxylpyx wrote:dam bro dats sick... off to the garden to eat some worms now.
Image

User avatar
hurlingdervish
Posts: 2971
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm

Post by hurlingdervish » Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:26 pm

sometimes a one bar break added on to the powers of 2 structure can work really well

its like a "false drop"

User avatar
sifres
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:22 pm
Location: Netherlands

Post by sifres » Fri Aug 21, 2009 8:19 pm

gravity wrote:lots of stuff is made simply to smash dancefloors, which unfortunately means being predictable a lot of the time (dunno why, its almost like producers underestimate the intelligence of clubbers...) also it makes life easier for the dj, which i also think is a bit of a cop out since the tnuc is getting paid to play records anyway, so at least give him something a bit more challenging.
Wow... I dunno where you come from, but in my universe you play for fun mostly and maybe, maybe, you land a gig every 3 months that pays out like 10% of what you put into actually buying gear and records... :wink:

I'm defo moving to where you live :D

Oh and... If you play an overly complicated record. People run for the bar. Which is also the reason you shouldn't over estimate the intelligence of the crowd. 70% are fucked beyond reason on a poison of choice, the obvious being alcohol, which makes for pretty stupid people :lol:

Ever hear a random drunken punter go:
"Wow did he just go from a 7/8 Fminor to a 3/4 Gmajor? That's so cool!"?
8)

Be creative people. Just don't over do it ;)
6 afraid of 7 cause 7 8 9

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by abZ » Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:39 pm

Sifres wrote:
gravity wrote:lots of stuff is made simply to smash dancefloors, which unfortunately means being predictable a lot of the time (dunno why, its almost like producers underestimate the intelligence of clubbers...) also it makes life easier for the dj, which i also think is a bit of a cop out since the tnuc is getting paid to play records anyway, so at least give him something a bit more challenging.
Wow... I dunno where you come from, but in my universe you play for fun mostly and maybe, maybe, you land a gig every 3 months that pays out like 10% of what you put into actually buying gear and records... :wink:

I'm defo moving to where you live :D

Oh and... If you play an overly complicated record. People run for the bar. Which is also the reason you shouldn't over estimate the intelligence of the crowd. 70% are fucked beyond reason on a poison of choice, the obvious being alcohol, which makes for pretty stupid people :lol:

Ever hear a random drunken punter go:
"Wow did he just go from a 7/8 Fminor to a 3/4 Gmajor? That's so cool!"?
8)

Be creative people. Just don't over do it ;)
It has nothing to do with intelligence. It has to do with the fact that people just want to go out and drink some beer or do some drugs and have a good time dancing / listening to some good / fun music. Yeah there is a small percentage of the population that just wants to go out and scratch their bears in the corner and bitch about the tunes but fuck them anyway. That said there is nothing wrong with some really out there artsy, original shit but the club / rave really isn't the place for it imo.

If you don't care about having dj's play your shit, that is fine but don't go around crying that no one wants to sign you because 90% of people that buy dubstep tunes are dj's looking for some fire for their next gig or mix.

User avatar
q23
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:08 pm

Re: Boring song structures

Post by q23 » Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:30 pm

[quote="Therapist"] How do you beat formulaeic, dj-friendly music without going mental, and being too unfriendly on the dj? [quote]

By making formulaic music that is not DJ friendly. Its the commonalities in the sounds and styles that allow you to use a word like Dubstep to describe a genre of music, and people already have at least an idea of what you are talking about.

Repitition in electronic music? What has the world come to?

User avatar
therapist
Posts: 3074
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Boring song structures

Post by therapist » Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:39 am

Q23 wrote:
Therapist wrote: How do you beat formulaeic, dj-friendly music without going mental, and being too unfriendly on the dj?

By making formulaic music that is not DJ friendly. Its the commonalities in the sounds and styles that allow you to use a word like Dubstep to describe a genre of music, and people already have at least an idea of what you are talking about.

Repitition in electronic music? What has the world come to?
I'm really not following you. Surely DJ friendly but not boring as f**k predictable is much better than the other way round?

Dropkick_Kid
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:09 am
Location: Transylvania

Post by Dropkick_Kid » Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:43 pm

I prefer 32bar intro's as they allow for a better build up altogether, not saying I'd stick to 32 bars though because I like to mix and match a lot.
Bass is love.

User avatar
gravity
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:31 pm

Post by gravity » Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:07 pm

Sifres wrote:
gravity wrote:lots of stuff is made simply to smash dancefloors, which unfortunately means being predictable a lot of the time (dunno why, its almost like producers underestimate the intelligence of clubbers...) also it makes life easier for the dj, which i also think is a bit of a cop out since the tnuc is getting paid to play records anyway, so at least give him something a bit more challenging.
Wow... I dunno where you come from, but in my universe you play for fun mostly and maybe, maybe, you land a gig every 3 months that pays out like 10% of what you put into actually buying gear and records... :wink:

I'm defo moving to where you live :D

Oh and... If you play an overly complicated record. People run for the bar. Which is also the reason you shouldn't over estimate the intelligence of the crowd. 70% are fucked beyond reason on a poison of choice, the obvious being alcohol, which makes for pretty stupid people :lol:

Ever hear a random drunken punter go:
"Wow did he just go from a 7/8 Fminor to a 3/4 Gmajor? That's so cool!"?
8)

Be creative people. Just don't over do it ;)
alrite the dj's being paid was probably a big generalization, but ive seen shit go off thats beyond your 'standard' tune structure. in watford of all places where most people are pissed louts who know fuck all about music. the second part of my post was quite important to what i was saying - you can do a lot whilst still fitting into a mixable structure. im not suggesting everyone go out and copy venetian snares structures or whatever, but standardized intro>wobwobwobwobbly bass drop>breakdown>same drop again>outtro is bollocks tbh and people do respond to other stuff.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests