yeah EQ, or gating, or compressing, delaying, phasers, etcnowaysj wrote:Like reverbs w/ eq abilities built in.setspeed wrote:but also because i like to EQ or effect the reverb return without affecting the original signal.
Reverbs & Delays - Do You Insert or Use Sends?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- my_fickle_eye
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:50 pm
- Location: bangor and brighton
- Contact:
I bus the drums together with a compressor and i just change the reverb wet/dry using automation on the same bus, but i rarely put reverb on anything but the drums. And i dont use a drum machine.
I guess sends just send part of the signal to the effect while everything will go through an insert.
I also put filters + other effects on a group channel (cubase) and will send multiple synths through them so you can get the same cut of and resonance with everything in one handy filter. (and it effects the whole sound)
I guess sends just send part of the signal to the effect while everything will go through an insert.
I also put filters + other effects on a group channel (cubase) and will send multiple synths through them so you can get the same cut of and resonance with everything in one handy filter. (and it effects the whole sound)
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Insert 100%. I rarely, if ever use sends for anything in my mixes.
Statement of Intent VIP / Sahaquiel v4 single out now on UK Trends.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
- youthful_implants
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
- Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan
Yeah I do the same, and also using parallel compression on a third.Deadly Habit wrote:seee on my cubase busses i have a dry drum bus for overall a 100% verb one then sometimes a third where i may blend the 2 as prefader sends once i'm happy with the 2 to gel together some more so verb sounds more natural to the kit
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
yea sometimes calls for that sometimes reg sometimes sidechainedyouthful_implants wrote:Yeah I do the same, and also using parallel compression on a third.Deadly Habit wrote:seee on my cubase busses i have a dry drum bus for overall a 100% verb one then sometimes a third where i may blend the 2 as prefader sends once i'm happy with the 2 to gel together some more so verb sounds more natural to the kit
i love cubase busses
- youthful_implants
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
- Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan
me too, such a flexible setup.Deadly Habit wrote:yea sometimes calls for that sometimes reg sometimes sidechainedyouthful_implants wrote:Yeah I do the same, and also using parallel compression on a third.Deadly Habit wrote:seee on my cubase busses i have a dry drum bus for overall a 100% verb one then sometimes a third where i may blend the 2 as prefader sends once i'm happy with the 2 to gel together some more so verb sounds more natural to the kit
i love cubase busses
Renoise lets me pre eq anyway. For delays, I can just create a duplicate track without delay and mute the source on the one with it.Deadly Habit wrote:yea you can get away with that if it has a wet/dry mix on it which alot do but a send will give you more controlcollige wrote:Insert 100%. I rarely, if ever use sends for anything in my mixes.
plus with a send you have pre send eq settings and post eq option
Statement of Intent VIP / Sahaquiel v4 single out now on UK Trends.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
yup like having a virtual rack and studio like reason minus using virtual cabling and viewsyouthful_implants wrote:me too, such a flexible setup.Deadly Habit wrote:yea sometimes calls for that sometimes reg sometimes sidechainedyouthful_implants wrote:Yeah I do the same, and also using parallel compression on a third.Deadly Habit wrote:seee on my cubase busses i have a dry drum bus for overall a 100% verb one then sometimes a third where i may blend the 2 as prefader sends once i'm happy with the 2 to gel together some more so verb sounds more natural to the kit
i love cubase busses
- youthful_implants
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
- Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan
yeah its a lot less confusing for sure.Deadly Habit wrote:yup like having a virtual rack and studio like reason minus using virtual cabling and viewsyouthful_implants wrote:me too, such a flexible setup.Deadly Habit wrote:yea sometimes calls for that sometimes reg sometimes sidechainedyouthful_implants wrote:Yeah I do the same, and also using parallel compression on a third.Deadly Habit wrote:seee on my cubase busses i have a dry drum bus for overall a 100% verb one then sometimes a third where i may blend the 2 as prefader sends once i'm happy with the 2 to gel together some more so verb sounds more natural to the kit
i love cubase busses
a mate of mine showed me his rack (lol) and it was a total headfuck in Reason.
dunno how people do it.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
yea reason needs a patchbay like a real studio has to avoid the clusterfuck of wires you'd normally haveyouthful_implants wrote:yeah its a lot less confusing for sure.Deadly Habit wrote:yup like having a virtual rack and studio like reason minus using virtual cabling and viewsyouthful_implants wrote:me too, such a flexible setup.Deadly Habit wrote:yea sometimes calls for that sometimes reg sometimes sidechainedyouthful_implants wrote: Yeah I do the same, and also using parallel compression on a third.
i love cubase busses
a mate of mine showed me his rack (lol) and it was a total headfuck in Reason.
dunno how people do it.
Re: Reverbs & Delays - Do You Insert or Use Sends?
I send reverb to various tracks as necessary, in addition, I layer reverb on certain channels in small quantities. There are many approaches but I would certainly refrain from using just two reverbs on a send for the whole tune, layer and use it for certain instruments. There is much to be gained from having separate sends for channels especially with drums, you can have numerous reverbs attached to seperate channels such as reverb on snare, delay on hihats, etc.contakt321 wrote:Hey there, sorry if this is a noob-y question:
When using Reverbs and Delays, do you apply them per instrument on the channels you want them or do you just use a send adjust the send amount of each channel as needed?
Also, why?
Just trying to understand if there is a value to having several different reverbs or delays with different settings or if I should just have 1 or 2 on a send and adjust the send amount.
Thanks in advance!!!
-
scooterjack
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:38 am
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
heh yea if they don't have enough patchbaysScooterJack wrote:Deadly Habit wrote: yea reason needs a patchbay like a real studio has to avoid the clusterfuck of wires you'd normally have
most of the real studios i work in, the patchbay is a clusterfuck of wires
+ you can turn off the wires in reason
i dunno me and reason never got along when attempting collabs
then again i built synths and such and rest was a mess to me due to weed
- youthful_implants
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
- Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan
story of my life.Deadly Habit wrote:heh yea if they don't have enough patchbaysScooterJack wrote:Deadly Habit wrote: yea reason needs a patchbay like a real studio has to avoid the clusterfuck of wires you'd normally have
most of the real studios i work in, the patchbay is a clusterfuck of wires
+ you can turn off the wires in reason
![]()
i dunno me and reason never got along when attempting collabs
then again i built synths and such and rest was a mess to me due to weed
I love Reason and I do use it rewired quite a bit, but I couldn't write a whole song in it.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
gpt mad respect to peeps like icr who churn out hit after hit using nothing but reasonyouthful_implants wrote:story of my life.Deadly Habit wrote:heh yea if they don't have enough patchbaysScooterJack wrote:Deadly Habit wrote: yea reason needs a patchbay like a real studio has to avoid the clusterfuck of wires you'd normally have
most of the real studios i work in, the patchbay is a clusterfuck of wires
+ you can turn off the wires in reason
![]()
i dunno me and reason never got along when attempting collabs
then again i built synths and such and rest was a mess to me due to weed
I love Reason and I do use it rewired quite a bit, but I couldn't write a whole song in it.
real wires soooo much easier when baked
-
paradigm_x
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am
re cubase groups - awesome, best way to work IMO, can send anything to anything else. Have about 20-25, will prob cut down now using 5 tho, FX Sends used to be really limited in SX3 so used groups for more flexibility, but FX Sends are much better in 5.
I have a group right at the end with a high pass and output (not send) all FX channels to that, gentle hi pass at around 2-300hz to remove LF mud from reverbs etc.
Parallel compression...
dBGlitch on a send, glitch reverbs and delays...
A hipass group for all synths, pads etc that dont need it.
Kick group, snare group, perc group, all into drum group (with 33609 on it ... =0 ) for max flexibility.
Also putting a compressor (LA2A) after the delays to control mad feedbacks. Sned delays to phasers etc... possibilities are endless.
Groups FTMFW !
I have a group right at the end with a high pass and output (not send) all FX channels to that, gentle hi pass at around 2-300hz to remove LF mud from reverbs etc.
Parallel compression...
dBGlitch on a send, glitch reverbs and delays...
A hipass group for all synths, pads etc that dont need it.
Kick group, snare group, perc group, all into drum group (with 33609 on it ... =0 ) for max flexibility.
Also putting a compressor (LA2A) after the delays to control mad feedbacks. Sned delays to phasers etc... possibilities are endless.
Groups FTMFW !
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
