to compress or not to compress ?

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
tripaddict
Posts: 2417
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Midlands, UK
Contact:

to compress or not to compress ?

Post by tripaddict »

the master channel why/why not ?

answers please :)
adam_misst
Posts: 819
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:29 pm
Location: Leeds/Nottingham
Contact:

Post by adam_misst »

I personally don't, I prefer to compress individual parts that require it rather than the track as a whole...however I do use ad-limiter and a limiter on the overall track, this will boost the volume without making it distorted...
User avatar
tripaddict
Posts: 2417
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Midlands, UK
Contact:

Post by tripaddict »

i've been compressing my master + others since about 2005 i think ill try a limiter on the master b/c it only tops out on certain punchy combined stabs

this doesnt happen tho if i compress it
vivace
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Rotterdam, Holland
Contact:

Post by vivace »

Compression is just an effect. If you like the sound, do compress. If you
don't, then don't. There is no right or wrong, just keep in mind that
compression kills dynamics and ask yourself if you want that, or need that.
Vivace

“Play the music, not the instrument.”
myst
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Leicester
Contact:

Post by myst »

I never compress the master, usually a tad on the drums - and a bit on the synth. VERY rarely on the bass just coz i dont like the way that sounds
User avatar
therapist
Posts: 3074
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:38 pm

Post by therapist »

I always wonder about pairing the clean master and a copy that's compressed to buggery, might work like it does with some drums.
User avatar
Sharmaji
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Contact:

Post by Sharmaji »

sometimes. as always at the master level, depends on the song. If it sounds like it could use a little less definition or edge (or more edge), then sure. and the more 'commercial'-sounding i want something, the more i'll reach for a comp on the master.

rarely at more than 2:1 ratio and rarely taking off more than 2-3db overall.

you should compress on the master for character, tho, not to reign in something that's peaky or doesn't fit.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
User avatar
tripaddict
Posts: 2417
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Midlands, UK
Contact:

Post by tripaddict »

its ok i sorted it now :) and my gosh are the levels sounding sweet

you should all check out TbT plugins they're very sick indeed

*and free

** and im never ever going to compress my master ever again :)
r
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:40 pm

Post by r »

a limiter IS a compressor with the attack on 0.0 and 1:inf ratio. treshhold is your dearest friend or dearest enemy.
manray
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:09 am

Post by manray »

Most people that say don't compress the master are saying so on the assumption your music is heading for a mastering engineer....Because they will be compressing your music...

If it's not heading to a mastering engineer then yeah, compress your master when you've finished making the track, or export it clean and then work on it, doesn't matter it's the same thing.

I have saved a preset which I put pretty much onto every track I finish, it's not perfect but it does quite well in most situations.
User avatar
tripaddict
Posts: 2417
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Midlands, UK
Contact:

Post by tripaddict »

R wrote:a limiter IS a compressor with the attack on 0.0 and 1:inf ratio. treshhold is your dearest friend or dearest enemy.
im using a maximiser now not a compressor :)
User avatar
tripaddict
Posts: 2417
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Midlands, UK
Contact:

Post by tripaddict »

manray wrote: If it's not heading to a mastering engineer then yeah, compress your master when you've finished making the track.
might try both :)
two oh one
Posts: 2786
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Croydon ---> Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by two oh one »

Use something really nice on the 2 buss.

And mix/build the track through it.

Fast enough to let the spikes through, slow enough to glue the thing together.

Never more than 2 or 3dB reduction with a low ratio. 2:1 is fine.

Compression is multiplicative, rather than additive. People forget this when stacking up compression on (often) already compressed samples.
Image
Image
Ahier wrote: I like to push lego up cat bums
User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan

Post by youthful_implants »

manray wrote:Most people that say don't compress the master are saying so on the assumption your music is heading for a mastering engineer....Because they will be compressing your music...

If it's not heading to a mastering engineer then yeah, compress your master when you've finished making the track, or export it clean and then work on it, doesn't matter it's the same thing.
totally agree.
720bass.com | Strontium | Future Perfect

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD
TWITTER
TUMBLR
User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan

Post by youthful_implants »

manray wrote:Most people that say don't compress the master are saying so on the assumption your music is heading for a mastering engineer....Because they will be compressing your music...

If it's not heading to a mastering engineer then yeah, compress your master when you've finished making the track, or export it clean and then work on it, doesn't matter it's the same thing.
totally agree.
720bass.com | Strontium | Future Perfect

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD
TWITTER
TUMBLR
User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan

Post by youthful_implants »

manray wrote:Most people that say don't compress the master are saying so on the assumption your music is heading for a mastering engineer....Because they will be compressing your music...

If it's not heading to a mastering engineer then yeah, compress your master when you've finished making the track, or export it clean and then work on it, doesn't matter it's the same thing.
totally agree.
720bass.com | Strontium | Future Perfect

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD
TWITTER
TUMBLR
User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan

Post by youthful_implants »

manray wrote:Most people that say don't compress the master are saying so on the assumption your music is heading for a mastering engineer....Because they will be compressing your music...

If it's not heading to a mastering engineer then yeah, compress your master when you've finished making the track, or export it clean and then work on it, doesn't matter it's the same thing.
totally agree.
720bass.com | Strontium | Future Perfect

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD
TWITTER
TUMBLR
User avatar
apathesis
Posts: 773
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:11 am
Location: Bristol BS6
Contact:

Post by apathesis »

If the tunes going to be mastered, then don't touch the master out.

If the tunes not going to be mastered, then you've got to give it some punch yourself.

IMO.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests