to compress or not to compress ?

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
vivace
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Rotterdam, Holland
Contact:

Post by vivace » Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:46 am

Depone wrote:Its not an effect.
Its a dynamic modifier.
How does this NOT make a compressor an effect?
If it alters, it's an effect.

A send is just as fragile if used without much care.
Vivace

“Play the music, not the instrument.”

manray
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:09 am

Post by manray » Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:31 am

Vivace wrote:
Depone wrote:Its not an effect.
Its a dynamic modifier.
How does this NOT make a compressor an effect?
If it alters, it's an effect.

A send is just as fragile if used without much care.
All pedantics. As long as people understand what a compressor does then it doesn't matter whether you call it an effect or not.

Personally i've used compressors as part of effects chains to sculpt a certain sound, with huge compression and sidechains etc.. Im sure most of us have.

adamc
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:05 am

Post by adamc » Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:53 am

I don't compress the master out, just stick a 24-bit Limiter on it and then do a final mix with that on.

Don't change what you do if you're taking your track to be mastered, if they're good at their job they'll not touch the track if there's nothing they can do. Otherwise half the time they just run the track through an L2.

User avatar
Sharmaji
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Contact:

Post by Sharmaji » Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:07 pm

mixing a track w/ a compressor on the master right now, actually-- watching it hit -.5 throughout the tune and -1 when huge hits come together.

basically, there's a ton going on in this tune in terms of layers of energy at different frequencies and with different dynamic ranges, that all need to work by themselves and work together as well. i could really agressively compress at the channel level--which i'm doing on the snare, sure-- or i can build up different levels and types of compression through the track (medium), group (fast, so that things almost begin to duck each other out based on frequency content), and then on the master (fast and light).

i'm also limiting a ton at the track level, decided which elements get to keep transient info (kick, snare, and percussion), which can have some (percussion, in this case), and which don't get any (synths and leads).

the whole concept of "glue" is that elements push and pull with each other. especially with really heavily-limited things, which have a long, altered front, if you compress w/ those you get some really interesting outcomes... artifacts that can work in your favor, basically.


so basically, in something like this that i want to sound HUGE but don't want anything to sound choked, varying degrees of compression--including some on the master--- gets me a better result than just squashing everything by itself.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK

two oh one
Posts: 2786
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Croydon ---> Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by two oh one » Tue Aug 25, 2009 5:08 pm

TeReKeTe wrote:mixing a track w/ a compressor on the master right now, actually-- watching it hit -.5 throughout the tune and -1 when huge hits come together.

basically, there's a ton going on in this tune in terms of layers of energy at different frequencies and with different dynamic ranges, that all need to work by themselves and work together as well. i could really agressively compress at the channel level--which i'm doing on the snare, sure-- or i can build up different levels and types of compression through the track (medium), group (fast, so that things almost begin to duck each other out based on frequency content), and then on the master (fast and light).

i'm also limiting a ton at the track level, decided which elements get to keep transient info (kick, snare, and percussion), which can have some (percussion, in this case), and which don't get any (synths and leads).

the whole concept of "glue" is that elements push and pull with each other. especially with really heavily-limited things, which have a long, altered front, if you compress w/ those you get some really interesting outcomes... artifacts that can work in your favor, basically.


so basically, in something like this that i want to sound HUGE but don't want anything to sound choked, varying degrees of compression--including some on the master--- gets me a better result than just squashing everything by itself.
Yes, yes!

And it has to be said that the track coming out of your DAW sounding like a record is phenomenally inspiring.

People shouldn't let the ME stop them from compressing your 2 bus lightly. It's YOUR record and YOU need to control how it sounds. They just need to get it louder and improve things, not alter your sound. Make it as good as you can in your box.

The trick is to do it lightly. If you can't hear the effect of just a couple of dB compression on your track at a low ratio, you've either got lead ears, or you're playing it too loud. You should be able to hear that subtle glue.

It's amazing what a small dab of compression can do to a track. Adding it later can alter the track and change your sound balance, possibly in a negative way. Although, I'm finding that if things are 'right', you can turn that 2dB compression on and off and the balance is more or less in tact, but just sounds less 'finished'.
Image
Image
Ahier wrote: I like to push lego up cat bums

User avatar
lojik
Posts: 896
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:04 pm
Contact:

Post by lojik » Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:00 pm

A compressor can actually be used as quite a strong, audible effect with the correct settings. I especially like using them with extreme settings applied to bells or short claves or something to create a really clicky, tuneful percussion sort of sound.

Obviously they are more commonly used in subtle ways as described by the people before me ;)
Out Now:
DD005 - Retrospect
MRS029 - Connected/Lovin' You
DAR010 - Santogold - Shove It (remix) 12"
SET003 - Bob Marley - Is This Love (remix) 12"
Echodub Loves Volume 2 - White Room
FTW Records Digital - Panic Room
FTW Free Compilation - Get Up (a.k.a Symphony)

adam_john
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: AZ
Contact:

Post by adam_john » Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:38 pm

I will occasionally mess with a compressor on the master when I'm just making MP3 mix downs to play out - just to get a certain sound.

However, when bouncing down the final mix to go to mastering, I don't put anything on the master channel - maybe just an EQ to roll off those high and low frequencies that are not needed, but I don't send out final mixes that have gone through a compressor on my master channel.
[theoretic | shift | muti music | tuff love dubs]

Image
http://adamjohnmusic.wordpress.com
http://facebook.com/adamjohnmusic

User avatar
tripaddict
Posts: 2417
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Midlands, UK
Contact:

Post by tripaddict » Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:43 am

two oh one wrote:
People shouldn't let the ME stop them from compressing your 2 bus lightly. It's YOUR record and YOU need to control how it sounds. They just need to get it louder and improve things, not alter your sound. Make it as good as you can in your box.
in the wrong hands tracks can sound awful over compressed bass drums make me stop listening ... esp when they get that horrible grainy cshhh noise urgh ! lol

User avatar
jedison
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:22 am
Location: Regina, Canada
Contact:

Post by jedison » Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:16 am

I've never had many tunes mastered but the ones I do I put nothing on the master for the master bounce but I generally just through an EQ and maximizer on and that's just to get it louder and dirty. I don't want to add more compressioney sound to my mix, it should be sounding good with headroom while you're making it and mixing it down.
Yoyoyo.

FSTZ1
Posts: 3438
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:27 pm
Contact:

Post by FSTZ1 » Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:50 am

over the years, this is the formula that works for me

good mixdown + limiting = ok to play out

good mixdown + light compression = give to the mastering engineer

User avatar
safeandsound
Posts: 336
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 5:47 pm
Location: London UK
Contact:

Post by safeandsound » Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:30 pm

When I was producing more I used to like a compressor
inserted on the master output on my analog board, interestingly though when I went mainly in the box for softsynths etc I did not put a plug in compressor on the mixbuss.

I felt when A/B ing it produced a slightly thicker and bigger sound, I used to compress not more than 3dB usually.
SafeandSound Mastering : PMC IB1S, MANLEY Massive Passive (Hardware), Summit Audio DCL-200, HCL Varis Vari Mu, Custom stereo linked 5 band mastering EQ.

.masteringmastering.co.uk/onlinemastering.html

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Post by deadly_habit » Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:33 pm

amything on main = no

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests