unsigned forum members' tracks & place for feedback
Forum rules
By using this "Dubs" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
it would be nice if people had a choice in what they could find to listen too. as seeing as its impossible to find something thats not a robot filth when your after a future garage type of thing, and even visa versa..
i propose what i said in the pole..
-boring wrote:people should just write what kind of style it is in the subject
I'm for it
Another thing you have to do is : you must wright correctly your producer name and track name when you put it to free download. That will help everybody and will avoid so many confusions.
It's your work... that take less than 60sec to correctly wright the right data.
Last edited by kraftpeanutbutterbear on Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:38 am, edited 3 times in total.
this idea should be happening on a much larger scale than DSF. why is it that chill 2steppy tracks and the crazy moshing wobblers are both still called "dubstep."
for the love of god, SUBGENRES ALREADY!
i tell people about dubstep and theyre like "man that stuff is boring" and a week later they hear a track in my car and theyre like "holy shit what is this?"
DUBSTEP!
"well what did i hear before?"
DUBSTEP!
makes no fucking sense. categorization is key to communication.
How about just listen through it? All these dudes talking about looking through tunes and finding what you like, I figure the dubs section should be the same
dubstep is dubstep imo. Most people tag the thread with phrases like "wobble, banger, filth etc... But I'm all for splitting it up. most tracks are buried within a day, so it would be nice to have more than one dub section
would be easyer if everybody present their effort in the same standard way, has :
Artist name - track name - kind of dub - other info such as release info
and stop making stupid topic name with crazy words that really mean nothing. it don't really help...
would be easyer if everybody present their effort in the same standard way, has :
Artist name - track name - kind of dub - other info such as release info
and stop making stupid topic name with crazy words that really mean nothing. it don't really help...
agreed
we dont need more than one dubs forum if people tag correctly
simples
kotku wrote:if something sounds like shit and is not pop then it's techno, or is this definition flawed aswell?
