Serious Poll On The Dubs Section *STICKY PLEASE*

feasible_weasel · Post by **feasible_weasel** » Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:01 pm

it would be nice if people had a choice in what they could find to listen too. as seeing as its impossible to find something thats not a robot filth when your after a future garage type of thing, and even visa versa..
i propose what i said in the pole..

_boring · Post by **_boring** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:42 pm

people should just write what kind of style it is in the subject

HangManDubstep · Post by **HangManDubstep** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:10 pm

-boring wrote:people should just write what kind of style it is in the subject

+1

roke · Post by **roke** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:20 pm

-boring wrote:people should just write what kind of style it is in the subject

makes sense, just changed mine

kraftpeanutbutterbear · Post by **kraftpeanutbutterbear** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:40 pm

-boring wrote:people should just write what kind of style it is in the subject

I'm for it

Another thing you have to do is : you must wright correctly your producer name and track name when you put it to free download. That will help everybody and will avoid so many confusions.

It's your work... that take less than 60sec to correctly wright the right data.

tripaddict · Post by **tripaddict** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:56 pm

should have one for glitch and on for straight dubstep and another for incomplete tunes imo

kaib0rg · Post by **kaib0rg** » Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:49 pm

this idea should be happening on a much larger scale than DSF. why is it that chill 2steppy tracks and the crazy moshing wobblers are both still called "dubstep."

for the love of god, SUBGENRES ALREADY!

i tell people about dubstep and theyre like "man that stuff is boring" and a week later they hear a track in my car and theyre like "holy shit what is this?"

DUBSTEP!

"well what did i hear before?"

DUBSTEP!

makes no fucking sense. categorization is key to communication.

sigbowls · Post by **sigbowls** » Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:02 am

d&b and glitch should be in the same section

evil madmen · Post by **evil madmen** » Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:59 am

How about just listen through it? All these dudes talking about looking through tunes and finding what you like, I figure the dubs section should be the same

redvsblue · Post by **redvsblue** » Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:19 am

dubstep is dubstep imo. Most people tag the thread with phrases like "wobble, banger, filth etc... But I'm all for splitting it up. most tracks are buried within a day, so it would be nice to have more than one dub section

kraftpeanutbutterbear · Post by **kraftpeanutbutterbear** » Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:40 am

Another thing :

would be easyer if everybody present their effort in the same standard way, has :
Artist name - track name - kind of dub - other info such as release info

and stop making stupid topic name with crazy words that really mean nothing. it don't really help...

jsaxton · Post by **jsaxton** » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:06 am

kraftpeanutbutterbear wrote:Another thing :

would be easyer if everybody present their effort in the same standard way, has :
Artist name - track name - kind of dub - other info such as release info

and stop making stupid topic name with crazy words that really mean nothing. it don't really help...

agreed

we dont need more than one dubs forum if people tag correctly
simples

Serious Poll On The Dubs Section STICKY PLEASE

What can we do to get people listened too in the dubs section?

Serious Poll On The Dubs Section STICKY PLEASE

Who is online