Pandas - To be or not to be?

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
kins83
Posts: 5979
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Leeds

Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by kins83 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:44 am

One of the BBCs nature correspondants, Chris Packham, recently said in a radio interview that the Panda should be allowed to go extinct, and that we should stop spending millions of pounds on trying to keep it in existence.

The cute and cuddly looking creature, the 'mascot' of the Worldwide Fund for Nature, is (,in my opinion,) a pretty lame creature. It can only eat bamboo, and because it doesn't really digest the bamboo vey well, it has to eat shitloads to stay alive. Add, to the very specialised diet, the fact that they don't seem to be big fans of reproducing, and it seems like a recipe for extinction.

So - are us humans completely at fault? Should our destruction of the Panda's habitat oblige us to try and keep it alive, despite the fact that it may well have gone extinct regardless of our involvment? Or should we just let it die out completely and free up time and resources to keep more deserving species alive?

Personally, I think they should probably be left to go extinct. What do you think?
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit

defekt
Posts: 579
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:29 pm

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by defekt » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:48 am

I don't know, I think if we didn't exist, they probably would. They'd have shit loads more bamboo to eat, so I think we should try to keep them alive.

bass hertz
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:28 am
Location: Land of the free, Home of the brave!

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by bass hertz » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:56 am

maybe they could learn to like sandwichs?

those pandas better smarten up and get with the 21st century.

kins83
Posts: 5979
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by kins83 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:58 am

bass hertz wrote:maybe they could learn to like sandwichs?

those pandas better smarten up and get with the 21st century.
See that's the thing. If they diversified a bit then they might have been alright. Still though, the fact remains that they're adverse to shagging, and all the sandwiches in the world aren't gonna help a species that doesn't have sex.
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit

User avatar
Dead Rats
Posts: 5630
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:55 am
Location: bed

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by Dead Rats » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:05 am

Left to go extinct. I have no doubts that humans contributed to their decline, but from the facts you've given, it's natural selection exactly. Don't shag, don't reproduce, don't live. Simple.
Image

User avatar
lil-tee
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:07 am

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by lil-tee » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:05 am

kins83 wrote:Add, to the very specialised diet, the fact that they don't seem to be big fans of reproducing, and it seems like a recipe for extinction.
send the rohypnol/viagra in! :twisted:

User avatar
diss04
Posts: 5727
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:47 pm
Location: Essex/London
Contact:

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by diss04 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:06 am

OP have you got the news link for this story?
Parson wrote:...and then God said unto Eve, "Have some of that, slag."

User avatar
Ham
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:57 pm
Location: Nottingham / Leeds

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by Ham » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:55 am

Given what you have written. Let them go.

More funds for the big cats FTW
“If your chest ain’t rattlin’, it ain’t happenin’”
Firky wrote:I wish my THC sodden memory worked :(

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by magma » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:04 am

I've been saying this for fucking ages. What is the Panda's fucking problem? Seriously? It's picky about food, it's picky about living conditions, it's picky about who it wants to fuck, it's picky about when it wants to fuck and it makes it so difficult for itself to fuck (some weird back to back business) that it would much rather have a nice sit down than get on with fucking.

Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.

FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

bass hertz
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:28 am
Location: Land of the free, Home of the brave!

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by bass hertz » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:16 am

kins83 wrote:
bass hertz wrote:maybe they could learn to like sandwichs?

those pandas better smarten up and get with the 21st century.
See that's the thing. If they diversified a bit then they might have been alright. Still though, the fact remains that they're adverse to shagging, and all the sandwiches in the world aren't gonna help a species that doesn't have sex.
they just need to be put in the mood....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHfHs2qpaSM

User avatar
lil-tee
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:07 am

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by lil-tee » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:16 am

magma wrote:I've been saying this for fucking ages. What is the Panda's fucking problem? Seriously? It's picky about food, it's picky about living conditions, it's picky about who it wants to fuck, it's picky about when it wants to fuck and it makes it so difficult for itself to fuck (some weird back to back business) that it would much rather have a nice sit down than get on with fucking.

Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.

FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS
to be fair, i can be picky about food, living conditions, and who i want to fuck. :oops:

kins83
Posts: 5979
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by kins83 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:26 am

lil-tee wrote:
magma wrote:I've been saying this for fucking ages. What is the Panda's fucking problem? Seriously? It's picky about food, it's picky about living conditions, it's picky about who it wants to fuck, it's picky about when it wants to fuck and it makes it so difficult for itself to fuck (some weird back to back business) that it would much rather have a nice sit down than get on with fucking.

Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.

FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS
to be fair, i can be picky about food, living conditions, and who i want to fuck. :oops:
To be fair though, there's millions of us. We can afford to be picky. For each individual panda, the fate of its entire species rests on it getting laid. Maybe it's the pressure of the situation that gives them bedroom troubles?
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by magma » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:30 am

kins83 wrote:
lil-tee wrote:
magma wrote:I've been saying this for fucking ages. What is the Panda's fucking problem? Seriously? It's picky about food, it's picky about living conditions, it's picky about who it wants to fuck, it's picky about when it wants to fuck and it makes it so difficult for itself to fuck (some weird back to back business) that it would much rather have a nice sit down than get on with fucking.

Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.

FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS
to be fair, i can be picky about food, living conditions, and who i want to fuck. :oops:
To be fair though, there's millions of us. We can afford to be picky. For each individual panda, the fate of its entire species rests on it getting laid. Maybe it's the pressure of the situation that gives them bedroom troubles?
People have even produced Panda Porn to get them in the mood... they're fucking sexless mate. I've no idea how they evolved like that, but it's almost certainly the result of some sick puritanical genetic engineering project in a ridiculously high tech past civilisation.

It's like they got kicked out of Eden without biting the fucking apple.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

kins83
Posts: 5979
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by kins83 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:32 am

magma wrote: it's almost certainly the result of some sick puritanical genetic engineering project in a ridiculously high tech past civilisation.
Is that you Parson?
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by magma » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:36 am

kins83 wrote:
magma wrote: it's almost certainly the result of some sick puritanical genetic engineering project in a ridiculously high tech past civilisation.
Is that you Parson?
MASONS TELL PANDAS NOT TO FUCK USING THE GEOMETRIC PATTERNS MADE BY BRANCHES IN TREES

NOTHING IS RANDOM
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

BaronVon
Posts: 4382
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:05 pm
Location: Yanbu

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by BaronVon » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:40 am

We should eat them.
I'm down for a nice slow roasted leg of Panda.
tr0tsky wrote: InI man nuh go to nah rasclot independent ethnic butchers seen.
Selassie-I man shop in Morrisons.

User avatar
badger
Posts: 13776
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by badger » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:41 am

couldn't agree more. there's something to be said for keeping the species going in captivity but if it's incapable of surviving in the wild despite all our best efforts then surely there comes a point where it's not worth bothering any more? some species are unquestionable forced to extinction as a result of man made intervention and destroying of habitats and so on but the panda's problem isn't man. the panda's problem is that it's utterly shit

kins83
Posts: 5979
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by kins83 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:05 pm

badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit
Thanks for my new sig, sir.
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit

User avatar
tommatee
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:19 am

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by tommatee » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:09 pm

Bamboo is massively abundant and not hard to grow. The chinese government pays most of those millions keeping them alive. A government with almost $2 trillion in the bank. I imagine the interest on that money more than covers it. They're also a tourist attraction that generates alot of revenue for the country and the panda's picture if fekin everywhere in this country (I currently live here, 1 year only please). So yea, saying we should let them go extinct is fuckwittedry of the highest order.
GMT

User avatar
Ham
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:57 pm
Location: Nottingham / Leeds

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?

Post by Ham » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:14 pm

tommatee wrote:Bamboo is massively abundant and not hard to grow. The chinese government pays most of those millions keeping them alive. A government with almost $2 trillion in the bank. I imagine the interest on that money more than covers it. They're also a tourist attraction that generates alot of revenue for the country and the panda's picture if fekin everywhere in this country (I currently live here, 1 year only please). So yea, saying we should let them go extinct is fuckwittedry of the highest order.

The queen produces massive tourist revenue for our country.
Her picture is fekin everywhere.

I think she should be extinct also.
“If your chest ain’t rattlin’, it ain’t happenin’”
Firky wrote:I wish my THC sodden memory worked :(

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests