Pandas - To be or not to be?
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Pandas - To be or not to be?
One of the BBCs nature correspondants, Chris Packham, recently said in a radio interview that the Panda should be allowed to go extinct, and that we should stop spending millions of pounds on trying to keep it in existence.
The cute and cuddly looking creature, the 'mascot' of the Worldwide Fund for Nature, is (,in my opinion,) a pretty lame creature. It can only eat bamboo, and because it doesn't really digest the bamboo vey well, it has to eat shitloads to stay alive. Add, to the very specialised diet, the fact that they don't seem to be big fans of reproducing, and it seems like a recipe for extinction.
So - are us humans completely at fault? Should our destruction of the Panda's habitat oblige us to try and keep it alive, despite the fact that it may well have gone extinct regardless of our involvment? Or should we just let it die out completely and free up time and resources to keep more deserving species alive?
Personally, I think they should probably be left to go extinct. What do you think?
The cute and cuddly looking creature, the 'mascot' of the Worldwide Fund for Nature, is (,in my opinion,) a pretty lame creature. It can only eat bamboo, and because it doesn't really digest the bamboo vey well, it has to eat shitloads to stay alive. Add, to the very specialised diet, the fact that they don't seem to be big fans of reproducing, and it seems like a recipe for extinction.
So - are us humans completely at fault? Should our destruction of the Panda's habitat oblige us to try and keep it alive, despite the fact that it may well have gone extinct regardless of our involvment? Or should we just let it die out completely and free up time and resources to keep more deserving species alive?
Personally, I think they should probably be left to go extinct. What do you think?
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
I don't know, I think if we didn't exist, they probably would. They'd have shit loads more bamboo to eat, so I think we should try to keep them alive.
-
bass hertz
- Permanent Vacation
- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:28 am
- Location: Land of the free, Home of the brave!
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
maybe they could learn to like sandwichs?
those pandas better smarten up and get with the 21st century.
those pandas better smarten up and get with the 21st century.
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
See that's the thing. If they diversified a bit then they might have been alright. Still though, the fact remains that they're adverse to shagging, and all the sandwiches in the world aren't gonna help a species that doesn't have sex.bass hertz wrote:maybe they could learn to like sandwichs?
those pandas better smarten up and get with the 21st century.
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
Left to go extinct. I have no doubts that humans contributed to their decline, but from the facts you've given, it's natural selection exactly. Don't shag, don't reproduce, don't live. Simple.

Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
send the rohypnol/viagra in!kins83 wrote:Add, to the very specialised diet, the fact that they don't seem to be big fans of reproducing, and it seems like a recipe for extinction.
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
OP have you got the news link for this story?
Parson wrote:...and then God said unto Eve, "Have some of that, slag."
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
Given what you have written. Let them go.
More funds for the big cats FTW
More funds for the big cats FTW
“If your chest ain’t rattlin’, it ain’t happenin’”
Firky wrote:I wish my THC sodden memory worked![]()
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
I've been saying this for fucking ages. What is the Panda's fucking problem? Seriously? It's picky about food, it's picky about living conditions, it's picky about who it wants to fuck, it's picky about when it wants to fuck and it makes it so difficult for itself to fuck (some weird back to back business) that it would much rather have a nice sit down than get on with fucking.
Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.
FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS
Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.
FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS
Meus equus tuo altior est
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
-
bass hertz
- Permanent Vacation
- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:28 am
- Location: Land of the free, Home of the brave!
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
they just need to be put in the mood....kins83 wrote:See that's the thing. If they diversified a bit then they might have been alright. Still though, the fact remains that they're adverse to shagging, and all the sandwiches in the world aren't gonna help a species that doesn't have sex.bass hertz wrote:maybe they could learn to like sandwichs?
those pandas better smarten up and get with the 21st century.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHfHs2qpaSM
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
to be fair, i can be picky about food, living conditions, and who i want to fuck.magma wrote:I've been saying this for fucking ages. What is the Panda's fucking problem? Seriously? It's picky about food, it's picky about living conditions, it's picky about who it wants to fuck, it's picky about when it wants to fuck and it makes it so difficult for itself to fuck (some weird back to back business) that it would much rather have a nice sit down than get on with fucking.
Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.
FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
To be fair though, there's millions of us. We can afford to be picky. For each individual panda, the fate of its entire species rests on it getting laid. Maybe it's the pressure of the situation that gives them bedroom troubles?lil-tee wrote:to be fair, i can be picky about food, living conditions, and who i want to fuck.magma wrote:I've been saying this for fucking ages. What is the Panda's fucking problem? Seriously? It's picky about food, it's picky about living conditions, it's picky about who it wants to fuck, it's picky about when it wants to fuck and it makes it so difficult for itself to fuck (some weird back to back business) that it would much rather have a nice sit down than get on with fucking.
Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.
FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
People have even produced Panda Porn to get them in the mood... they're fucking sexless mate. I've no idea how they evolved like that, but it's almost certainly the result of some sick puritanical genetic engineering project in a ridiculously high tech past civilisation.kins83 wrote:To be fair though, there's millions of us. We can afford to be picky. For each individual panda, the fate of its entire species rests on it getting laid. Maybe it's the pressure of the situation that gives them bedroom troubles?lil-tee wrote:to be fair, i can be picky about food, living conditions, and who i want to fuck.magma wrote:I've been saying this for fucking ages. What is the Panda's fucking problem? Seriously? It's picky about food, it's picky about living conditions, it's picky about who it wants to fuck, it's picky about when it wants to fuck and it makes it so difficult for itself to fuck (some weird back to back business) that it would much rather have a nice sit down than get on with fucking.
Seriously.... they are one of the shittest animals going, Darwin would've told us to fuck them off decades ago.
FUCK OR DIE YOU MORONS
It's like they got kicked out of Eden without biting the fucking apple.
Meus equus tuo altior est
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
Is that you Parson?magma wrote: it's almost certainly the result of some sick puritanical genetic engineering project in a ridiculously high tech past civilisation.
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
MASONS TELL PANDAS NOT TO FUCK USING THE GEOMETRIC PATTERNS MADE BY BRANCHES IN TREESkins83 wrote:Is that you Parson?magma wrote: it's almost certainly the result of some sick puritanical genetic engineering project in a ridiculously high tech past civilisation.
NOTHING IS RANDOM
Meus equus tuo altior est
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
We should eat them.
I'm down for a nice slow roasted leg of Panda.
I'm down for a nice slow roasted leg of Panda.
tr0tsky wrote: InI man nuh go to nah rasclot independent ethnic butchers seen.
Selassie-I man shop in Morrisons.
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
couldn't agree more. there's something to be said for keeping the species going in captivity but if it's incapable of surviving in the wild despite all our best efforts then surely there comes a point where it's not worth bothering any more? some species are unquestionable forced to extinction as a result of man made intervention and destroying of habitats and so on but the panda's problem isn't man. the panda's problem is that it's utterly shit
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
Thanks for my new sig, sir.badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
Bamboo is massively abundant and not hard to grow. The chinese government pays most of those millions keeping them alive. A government with almost $2 trillion in the bank. I imagine the interest on that money more than covers it. They're also a tourist attraction that generates alot of revenue for the country and the panda's picture if fekin everywhere in this country (I currently live here, 1 year only please). So yea, saying we should let them go extinct is fuckwittedry of the highest order.
GMT
Re: Pandas - To be or not to be?
tommatee wrote:Bamboo is massively abundant and not hard to grow. The chinese government pays most of those millions keeping them alive. A government with almost $2 trillion in the bank. I imagine the interest on that money more than covers it. They're also a tourist attraction that generates alot of revenue for the country and the panda's picture if fekin everywhere in this country (I currently live here, 1 year only please). So yea, saying we should let them go extinct is fuckwittedry of the highest order.
The queen produces massive tourist revenue for our country.
Her picture is fekin everywhere.
I think she should be extinct also.
“If your chest ain’t rattlin’, it ain’t happenin’”
Firky wrote:I wish my THC sodden memory worked![]()
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests