Dubstep in the New York Times

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
Pallms
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:32 am
Location: California

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by Pallms » Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:41 am

Even if the review wasn't 100%, it's still pretty amazing that an underground scene that originated far from New York got published in it's newspaper.

surface_tension
Posts: 3063
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:53 am
Location: Windianapolis, Windiana
Contact:

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by surface_tension » Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:29 am

zitanb wrote:Clearly missed the point of REWINDs LOL ..... :lol: But yeah probably really good for the US dubstep scene ... its terms of connecting to joe public
Sounds like the DJ's playing the night missed the point of rewinds. Clearly it was too much. If a completely unbiased person shows up for the first time, and their only previous dance music experience involves house/techno/trance/hiphop... imagine showing up expecting a turntablist and getting trainwreck after trainwreck, non mix after non mix... same tune for 10 minutes, same tune for 10 minutes, same tune for 10 minutes... zero mixes in 30 minutes.

One does wonder how many of those rewinds were meant entirely to cover a blown mix.

User avatar
tacospheros
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:55 pm
Location: sing sing, NY

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by tacospheros » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:57 pm

there were alot of rewinds but noobs have been saying that about dubwar forever . so yeah .......
wub wub wub wub wubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwub

http://lucidbackflips.wordpress.com/
@tacosphere tweet tweet, muthafucka

dunza
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:28 am

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by dunza » Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:55 pm

lol, they dont even know what a pull up is. rewind selecta
Youngblood Sound -

Copenhagen, Denmark

User avatar
maksim
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:57 am
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by maksim » Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:22 pm

surface_tension wrote:
zitanb wrote:Clearly missed the point of REWINDs LOL ..... :lol: But yeah probably really good for the US dubstep scene ... its terms of connecting to joe public
Sounds like the DJ's playing the night missed the point of rewinds. Clearly it was too much. If a completely unbiased person shows up for the first time, and their only previous dance music experience involves house/techno/trance/hiphop... imagine showing up expecting a turntablist and getting trainwreck after trainwreck, non mix after non mix... same tune for 10 minutes, same tune for 10 minutes, same tune for 10 minutes... zero mixes in 30 minutes.

One does wonder how many of those rewinds were meant entirely to cover a blown mix.
rass, were you there or something? because every time i've seen skream hes mixed fine, note: they mix the tune in first then let it drop then pull it up, i've never once seen skream just play the next tune (apart from on stella sesh) i think you just need to calm down abit on the exaggerations

User avatar
seckle
Posts: 12404
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:58 pm

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by seckle » Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:05 am

if you don't understand rewinds then you definitely haven't listened to enough reggae or dub. rewinds goes back to the 70's and soundclashing in kingston. one studio vs another studio. one dj vs another dj. its foundational business. its part of the experience. obviously, everything in moderation, but I was there for the whole of Skream and Benga, and there wasn't trainwrecking, or over rewound tunes. you have to understand that the crowd response cue's the rewind most of the time. the crowd at both dub war and T&B last weekend were raging all night.

User avatar
antipode
Posts: 4922
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:26 am

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by antipode » Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:22 am

THIS. calling it some sort of derivative of hiphop is probably the best thing this journalist could have said. hiphop is the biggest music in this country, and people actually know what it is. If he would have wrote something along the lines of, ....it formed out of the garage scene...... no one would know what that is.
God forbid they actually report the facts.
jrkhnds wrote:
and I've never really rated dubstep..
- dubstepforum, 2014.

User avatar
stoppauseplay
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:58 am
Contact:

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by stoppauseplay » Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:49 am

“Actions Speak Louder Than Blogs”

good t shirt.

though it does sound like the place was going mental and the journalist was struggling to see from the back whilst intermittently getting pissed off with people bumping into them and spilling their glass of pinot grigio...
:: Stop Pause Play ::

http://blog.stoppauseplay.net

Image

surface_tension
Posts: 3063
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:53 am
Location: Windianapolis, Windiana
Contact:

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by surface_tension » Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:03 pm

seckle wrote:if you don't understand rewinds then you definitely haven't listened to enough reggae or dub. rewinds goes back to the 70's and soundclashing in kingston. one studio vs another studio. one dj vs another dj. its foundational business. its part of the experience. obviously, everything in moderation, but I was there for the whole of Skream and Benga, and there wasn't trainwrecking, or over rewound tunes. you have to understand that the crowd response cue's the rewind most of the time. the crowd at both dub war and T&B last weekend were raging all night.
I watched you call for a 5th reload of Spongebob by Mala when Loefah and Mala were at Dubwar. No offense, but your opinion of moderation in reloading tunes is a bit lopsided based on that observation.

The reload is the 30 minute guitar solo of the scene. 100% masturbation for the egocentric. Remember when D1 played at Dubwar? No reloads, flawless mixing and I seriously doubt that anyone would make the argument that it was any less entertaining than Skream and Benga. Quite the opposite. Crowd went off. I guess it wasn't Dubstep. Rewinds are like Kiss' makeup. They are a gimmick. What we're doing is placing a premium on tune posession and ignoring talent in the DJ game. And we wonder why people think nothing of stealing tunes that aren't publicly available and playing them out.

Maybe I'm totally off base, but I'd rather hear a solid mix than dead silence and cheering from a crowd. What are they cheering?

If 30 minutes of a 2 hour set is less than maybe 7-8 tunes, we're not getting our money worth. Or at least, I'm not. If every tune is getting pulled up, it also calls how varied the DJs set is into question. Really... all peak hour tunes, all bangers, all drops, etc... boring. How COULD someone from the outside world understand the rewind as anything but masturbation after the 3rd or 4th time you wheel a tune?

Also, when you have music called DUBstep and it doesn't contain any actual DUB influence outside of dicksizing(our system is bigger, our dubs are more exclusive... etc) why don't we just have the DJs box each other on stage instead? Nobody is playing any Dub influenced anything anymore... or very few are. Where is the influence... the reloads? We don't have people carrying machine guns into Love and firing them in the air when the bassline kicks in yea?

User avatar
dopelabs
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:43 am
Location: San Jose
Contact:

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by dopelabs » Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:23 am

this is what happens when a journalist that doesnt know shit about the genre struggles to write an article....
Image

User avatar
collige
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:50 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by collige » Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:39 am

surface_tension wrote: I watched you call for a 5th reload of Spongebob by Mala
wat
The reload is the 30 minute guitar solo of the scene. 100% masturbation for the egocentric.
The same could be said for ignoring crowds calling for a rewind and focusing only on the mix. DJing, by its very nature, requires crowd interaction.
We don't have people carrying machine guns into Love and firing them in the air when the bassline kicks in yea?

That would be fucking awesome.
Statement of Intent VIP / Sahaquiel v4 single out now on UK Trends.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter

♫♪♫
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:03 am

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by ♫♪♫ » Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:49 am

I've never heard the rewind abused at live shows...quite the opposite, actually, I've only seen it used sparingly in live sets. On the other hand, it's absurd when I'm trying to chill out listening to Sub.FM and two tools in the chatroom are mashing "5" after every single drop in every single song and the DJ complies. Now that's annoying.

User avatar
legend4ry
Posts: 10589
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:56 am
Location: Woolwich

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by legend4ry » Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:02 am

Atleast the genre is getting press these days..........And its not exactly a bad bit of press either - get those panties untwisted! if you think you could do better, write an arctical and send it to news papers innit.

And for the record - a lot of non-dance floor orientated dubstep would be amazing in films like that twilight thing as its quite emotional, cinematic music and would be absolutely great for a scene what needs something dark and mysterious with a optimistic undertone!
Soulstep wrote: My point is i just wanna hear more vibes
Soundcloud

User avatar
tacospheros
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:55 pm
Location: sing sing, NY

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by tacospheros » Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:05 am

surface_tension wrote:
seckle wrote:if you don't understand rewinds then you definitely haven't listened to enough reggae or dub. rewinds goes back to the 70's and soundclashing in kingston. one studio vs another studio. one dj vs another dj. its foundational business. its part of the experience. obviously, everything in moderation, but I was there for the whole of Skream and Benga, and there wasn't trainwrecking, or over rewound tunes. you have to understand that the crowd response cue's the rewind most of the time. the crowd at both dub war and T&B last weekend were raging all night.
I watched you call for a 5th reload of Spongebob by Mala when Loefah and Mala were at Dubwar. No offense, but your opinion of moderation in reloading tunes is a bit lopsided based on that observation.

The reload is the 30 minute guitar solo of the scene. 100% masturbation for the egocentric. Remember when D1 played at Dubwar? No reloads, flawless mixing and I seriously doubt that anyone would make the argument that it was any less entertaining than Skream and Benga. Quite the opposite. Crowd went off. I guess it wasn't Dubstep. Rewinds are like Kiss' makeup. They are a gimmick. What we're doing is placing a premium on tune posession and ignoring talent in the DJ game. And we wonder why people think nothing of stealing tunes that aren't publicly available and playing them out.

Maybe I'm totally off base, but I'd rather hear a solid mix than dead silence and cheering from a crowd. What are they cheering?

If 30 minutes of a 2 hour set is less than maybe 7-8 tunes, we're not getting our money worth. Or at least, I'm not. If every tune is getting pulled up, it also calls how varied the DJs set is into question. Really... all peak hour tunes, all bangers, all drops, etc... boring. How COULD someone from the outside world understand the rewind as anything but masturbation after the 3rd or 4th time you wheel a tune?

Also, when you have music called DUBstep and it doesn't contain any actual DUB influence outside of dicksizing(our system is bigger, our dubs are more exclusive... etc) why don't we just have the DJs box each other on stage instead? Nobody is playing any Dub influenced anything anymore... or very few are. Where is the influence... the reloads? We don't have people carrying machine guns into Love and firing them in the air when the bassline kicks in yea?

dude i think you just need to chill. rewinds are not a gimmick. there isn't even that much thought put into them, it's an in the moment thing. the crowd goes bonkers for the tune to the point of tearing the walls down, you pull that tune up . simple as that. nothing more. except in your post

there were plenty of times when they dropped a big tune and DIDN'T pull it up . so uhh, yeah. obviously, too much of anything is a bad thing, but isn't that the conclusion reached in EVERY SINGLE THREAD ABOUT RELOADS ??
wub wub wub wub wubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwub

http://lucidbackflips.wordpress.com/
@tacosphere tweet tweet, muthafucka

b1t_crunch3r
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:08 am
Contact:

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by b1t_crunch3r » Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:42 am

surface_tension wrote:
seckle wrote:if you don't understand rewinds then you definitely haven't listened to enough reggae or dub. rewinds goes back to the 70's and soundclashing in kingston. one studio vs another studio. one dj vs another dj. its foundational business. its part of the experience. obviously, everything in moderation, but I was there for the whole of Skream and Benga, and there wasn't trainwrecking, or over rewound tunes. you have to understand that the crowd response cue's the rewind most of the time. the crowd at both dub war and T&B last weekend were raging all night.
I watched you call for a 5th reload of Spongebob by Mala when Loefah and Mala were at Dubwar. No offense, but your opinion of moderation in reloading tunes is a bit lopsided based on that observation.

The reload is the 30 minute guitar solo of the scene. 100% masturbation for the egocentric. Remember when D1 played at Dubwar? No reloads, flawless mixing and I seriously doubt that anyone would make the argument that it was any less entertaining than Skream and Benga. Quite the opposite. Crowd went off. I guess it wasn't Dubstep. Rewinds are like Kiss' makeup. They are a gimmick. What we're doing is placing a premium on tune posession and ignoring talent in the DJ game. And we wonder why people think nothing of stealing tunes that aren't publicly available and playing them out.

Maybe I'm totally off base, but I'd rather hear a solid mix than dead silence and cheering from a crowd. What are they cheering?

If 30 minutes of a 2 hour set is less than maybe 7-8 tunes, we're not getting our money worth. Or at least, I'm not. If every tune is getting pulled up, it also calls how varied the DJs set is into question. Really... all peak hour tunes, all bangers, all drops, etc... boring. How COULD someone from the outside world understand the rewind as anything but masturbation after the 3rd or 4th time you wheel a tune?

Also, when you have music called DUBstep and it doesn't contain any actual DUB influence outside of dicksizing(our system is bigger, our dubs are more exclusive... etc) why don't we just have the DJs box each other on stage instead? Nobody is playing any Dub influenced anything anymore... or very few are. Where is the influence... the reloads? We don't have people carrying machine guns into Love and firing them in the air when the bassline kicks in yea?

this is the truth ,all of it....i would love to add to it but it really says it all,especially the part about 100% masturbation for the egocentric.i think we all know this is the truth.anyone opposed to what surface tension has said should ask yourself what is good for the scene instead of your image and ego.
Jason Foster

User avatar
abstractsound
Posts: 652
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:59 pm
Location: brooklyn
Contact:

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by abstractsound » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:10 am

regardless of said article's quality, regardless of what the DJs did at the party, regardless of your take on the rewind, what is good for the scene is that DUBSTEP IS IN THE NEW YORK TIMES. that's a few million people who have probably never heard the word before.

and to those who can't see why an american journalist would akin the dstep to hiphop, you're crazy

easy

User avatar
seckle
Posts: 12404
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:58 pm

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by seckle » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:11 am

how about sparing us all the dubplate angst, and start a night of your own, with your own rules, and your own egoless lineups!!! no ones forcing you to go to a skream/benga show. you have choices! tons of choices now. do something positive with that energy, instead of obsessing over shit that 98% of the people going to these parties on a given weekend, don't give a fuck about.


User avatar
tacospheros
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:55 pm
Location: sing sing, NY

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by tacospheros » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:04 pm

no no no , you must drink RED wine whilst reloading spongebob for the fifth time. pinot, that's like wearing white after labor day
wub wub wub wub wubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwub

http://lucidbackflips.wordpress.com/
@tacosphere tweet tweet, muthafucka

User avatar
iron myke
Posts: 304
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:53 pm
Location: Head caught in scoop

Re: Dubstep in the New York Times

Post by iron myke » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:49 pm

starkey wrote:what's wrong with pinot grigio?
I recommend the Peanut Noir.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests