
Ah yeah, I've always wanted to ask that here on the forum: Does the tempo really change WITHIN some of Coki's tunes?!?
gettingcolder wrote:... and I think that there are some nasty tracks where the bpm change within the tune. At least that's the impression I got with some Coki tunes.![]()
Ah yeah, I've always wanted to ask that here on the forum: Does the tempo really change WITHIN some of Coki's tunes?!?
Surely it depends on the speed of the tune in the first place - because it's a % increase in the speed of the turntable.gwa wrote:
I think, if I can remember correctly, +1 pitch = 0.7 BPM, so +2 = 1.4 BPM, I could be wrong. Anyway, learn to beat match with your ears, not by numbers.
Surely it depends on the speed of the tune in the first place - because it's a % increase in the speed of the turntable.gwa wrote:
I think, if I can remember correctly, +1 pitch = 0.7 BPM, so +2 = 1.4 BPM, I could be wrong. Anyway, learn to beat match with your ears, not by numbers.
Surely it depends on the speed of the tune in the first place - because it's a % increase in the speed of the turntable.gwa wrote:
I think, if I can remember correctly, +1 pitch = 0.7 BPM, so +2 = 1.4 BPM, I could be wrong. Anyway, learn to beat match with your ears, not by numbers.
because if a tune is at 100 bpm and you increase the speed by 1% then it would be 101 bpm but if it's at 200 bpm and you increase the speed by 1% it would be 202 bpmgwa wrote:Why would it matter to what speed the tune is. +1 on the pitch would mean it.s 0.7 BPM faster? I don't think % is related
even though I have a published book that says otherwise?gwa wrote:No, I still stand by my comment.
I think it's the case with both 'Tortured' and 'Shattered' (vinyl), but it's more obvious with Tortured. I just re-checked it. I usually don't have problems with precise beat-matching, at least when relaxed/at home. But here, whenever I think I've finally made it, the tempo first increases and then decreases or vice versa, and this happens within a time-span of 10-20 seconds or so, without me having moved the pitch control.strmtrpr wrote:I find it really hard to believe that he would actually shift tempo, but I haven't really been paying attention to what Coki does now a days. Can u name song where you think the tempo changes?
If they are the same tempo, you won't need to hit the pitch fader. But if they are not in phase (hitting at the same time) You'll need to learn to "touch" the deck to either nudge it forward by pushing on the label or slow it down by letting your finger graze the nubs on the side of the platter [ on a cdj you just spin the side of the platter forward or backward]Dubzteppa wrote:One more question, if two tracks are both 140 bpm, and i bring one tune in on the beat (i always go for the snare, is that ok?) i wont need to adjust the pitch control at all, will i? they should just be in time and stay in time, right?
someone please fill me in on this!!
No your wrong, double drops are a hugely contentious issue and your confusing simple regular structured mixing with arguably the most debated mixing technique out there, well it used to be in dnb anyways, its a really tricky technique that almost always sounds crap, finding two tracks that double drop together well (i.e both basslines start at the same time but work together in a rhythm without conflict) is like the holy grail of mixing.gwa wrote:
Bringing in tunes - If you listen to the track enough, you'll know it like the back of your hand. That too is a case of personal preference, getting a breakdown and an intro to drop at the same time is a double drop, popular mixing technique.
Hope that helps.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests