ah, you forced yourself, just you missed the 32432 posts where i said i only talk about the first sentence there, that's better than anyone else could providemagma wrote:Their predictions haven't had any accuracy yet... last time I checked, IBM weren't in danger of dropping to 30% of their workforce. It's obvious that an "assumption" isn't a 100% prediction.... it's an insurance policy that they're very likely to have to cash in at some point.alien pimp wrote:oh, thanks for letting me know, i thought my point was no one relevant had predictions of such accuracy like IBM, why exactly them and why not publicly?magma wrote:Your point was nobody talked about pandemics before this document.alien pimp wrote:the document is from 2006, as i said, bring anything like it from that time, even from 2007, and subject's dead, bam, case closed!
It's internal because why would IBM want the world to know their corporate strategies? The fact that they say on that slide that they will cooperate with government wishes, shows that they're not sitting alone in a corner planning for the end of humanity. If government plans conflict with theirs, they go with the government one. Sounds very similar to the plans that were circulated here last year and earlier this year. I got provided with hand sanitiser, as did every employee... all big companies have these plans.
Seriously, the world isn't as scary as you want it to be.
if it's not that good can you provide better, or at least similar stuff from that time on?
you almost made it, it wasn't such a long sentence


 
 


 
  

