that's all well and good, but no I don't think it helps to have millions of low quality tunes floating around in a scene, especially when a lot of DJs appear to equate 'unreleased' with 'good' (as I mentioned before).South3rn wrote:believe it also HELPS
quality control in a certain way as well. IMO it could
possibly push people to learn more and to only get
better and better at producing beatz.
the rise of digital technology, from cracked copies of Reason and Yousendit to cheap CDRs and CDJs, has significantly lowered the cost threshold of producing, sharing and playing tunes out, without any inherent form of regulation. Producers want their name to get out there, so they're whacking out shitloads of tunes for DJs to play in 320 mp3 format, often it seems with little consideration of whether it's the very best of what they can produce.
This is why the often-hated 'dubplate culture' can be a useful thing - do you really think all these DJs would be playing all these tunes out if they had to pay £25-£30 minimum to cut a dbl-sided plate?? No fucking way. Same with vinyl releases - to use an obvious example, the DMZ guys have reams of incredible tunage in their arsenal, but it's literally only the very best which make it to wax, and this is after considerable time road-testing on plate in the clubs.
That's what I mean when I say quality control. It may seem negative/elitist but it's not. It just works.



