ableton live 5 question
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- Sub Shifter
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:41 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
ableton live 5 question
wot are the adventages of using live 5 over sx3 just got a copy of it today and carnt see why people are hypeing about it 
- hornblas
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:44 am
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Contact:
Re: ableton live 5 question
I actually use both. I work first with Live to build a track and I import into SX and finish the song.blaze wrote:wot are the adventages of using live 5 over sx3 just got a copy of it today and carnt see why people are hypeing about it
For a live shows "Live" can't be beat. I second the Warp Markers repsonse!!!
really? it seems okay for me, but then again, i dont do full arrangements with VSTs in it.
the native effects kick ASS, and their suprisingly easy on cpu i think. Live also has some really killer routing possibilities. check out this video, monolake makes rain with only live's effects.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL4MMJMXEFk
i absolutely LOVE shit like this! also, since my last post i've been using live more, and i find, like kid logic, that its ease of use cant be matched
the native effects kick ASS, and their suprisingly easy on cpu i think. Live also has some really killer routing possibilities. check out this video, monolake makes rain with only live's effects.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL4MMJMXEFk
i absolutely LOVE shit like this! also, since my last post i've been using live more, and i find, like kid logic, that its ease of use cant be matched
- Sub Shifter
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:41 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
- hornblas
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:44 am
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Contact:
I haven't tried that, although I know that when you run Live in ReWire mode you can't open a VST in Live. The only thing you can you use are wav or mp3 files not instruments.blaze wrote:thanks for all the replies yeh the warp markers are very good and im also finding it good on cpu the only thing now thats troubling me is how do u open a live instrument wen rewired to sx3
- Sub Shifter
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:41 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
hornblas wrote:I haven't tried that, although I know that when you run Live in ReWire mode you can't open a VST in Live. The only thing you can you use are wav or mp3 files not instruments.blaze wrote:thanks for all the replies yeh the warp markers are very good and im also finding it good on cpu the only thing now thats troubling me is how do u open a live instrument wen rewired to sx3
- hornblas
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:44 am
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Contact:
mamosa wrote:I dont see the need to rewire live to cubase? Surly use one or the other? or bounce down the shit you do in one to use in the other, personally i use both depending on my mood, but never together...
Have you used Cubase's time stretch? Horrible if you are time-stretching from very fast to very slow or vice-versa. By using Live re-wired into Cubase I can take advantage of Live's timestretching algorithm which is the best on the market.
Also I have external MIDI gear and re-wiring allows me use those in conjunction with Live.
- Sub Shifter
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:41 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Have you used Cubase's time stretch? Horrible if you are time-stretching from very fast to very slow or vice-versa. By using Live re-wired into Cubase I can take advantage of Live's timestretching algorithm which is the best on the market.Also I have external MIDI gear and re-wiring allows me use those in conjunction with Live.
yeh the time stretch is over heavy rewired but live would of been better if you could use the instruments in cubase wen rewired
opinions please - along side blaze's question.
Can you go from concept to fulfillment entirely with Live? Do you really need to have another program (ala Cubase) for final arrangements and pre-mastering?
I have been toying with the idea of switching to Live - upgrading my Cubase would cost $199US whereas a new copy of Live is $499 ($599 boxed). If I need to do both it could change my plans.
Anyone? Also, is it worth the extra $100 bucks for the manuals? I assume that and some pretty packaging is what you are paying for...
thanks!
Can you go from concept to fulfillment entirely with Live? Do you really need to have another program (ala Cubase) for final arrangements and pre-mastering?
I have been toying with the idea of switching to Live - upgrading my Cubase would cost $199US whereas a new copy of Live is $499 ($599 boxed). If I need to do both it could change my plans.
Anyone? Also, is it worth the extra $100 bucks for the manuals? I assume that and some pretty packaging is what you are paying for...
thanks!
- djshiva
- Posts: 4933
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:13 pm
- Location: aka sapphic_beats Indianaptizzle, IN USA
- Contact:
i do it all, from scratching out the basics right up to pre-mastering in Live.ozeb wrote:opinions please - along side blaze's question.
Can you go from concept to fulfillment entirely with Live? Do you really need to have another program (ala Cubase) for final arrangements and pre-mastering?
I have been toying with the idea of switching to Live - upgrading my Cubase would cost $199US whereas a new copy of Live is $499 ($599 boxed). If I need to do both it could change my plans.
Anyone? Also, is it worth the extra $100 bucks for the manuals? I assume that and some pretty packaging is what you are paying for...
thanks!
just get the download. the box and printed manual is nice, but not entirely necessary. and certainly not worth $100.
Here, have a free tune:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
- Sub Shifter
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:41 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
