Worst standard DAW ever...
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
mixin' down a tune for release in PT tomorrow. enjoying the prospect of taking off my "writing, let's get this shit messed up!!!" hat and putting on my responsible "mixer who worries about gain structure and the dancefloor in equal measure" hat.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
Hear ye, hear ye, Court is now in session!
In the matter of CD v. DH, the Court finds:
OP's post was made in frustration at coming in contact with opaque software. A very reasonable response shared by many who have been forced to use it. The court takes no offense at this post.
DH's initial response of, "a poor artist is always the first to blame their tools" is fairly diggy. The Court finds this statement to be 60% diggy, as the reasonable inference to be drawn from this statement is that OP is a poor artist.
The statement was also fairly unrelated to the OP's initial post. OP's argument was merely that Pro tools is unnecessarily difficult to learn or use, especially in comparison to other DAW software on the market.
Also of note, it is the poor craftsman who blames their tools, not the artist. There is a significant distinction between these terms that should not be lost.
CD's offense to DH's statement, and the inference reasonably drawn from it, is warranted. However, CD's level of offense, as exhibited in his first post of, "wow what a wack thing to say in response to a post like that," exceeds the reasonable level of offense to be taken from DH's initial post by 5%.
LfpHUNK's statement that, "cloak and dagger your logic and thought process is so logical you would make a good computer programmer," is found by the court be unwarranted as the second post of a thread is reasonably expected to refer to the initial post or the poster. This logical conclusion is hardly above the threshold exhibited by children, primates or even canines given the proper conditioning.
To balance the equities in the case of CD v. DH the Court hereby orders DH to ten push ups and issues a reminder to watch your manners. CD is ordered to drag 120 grit sandpaper across your palms five times. This will thicken your man hand skin by approximately 5%, the amount necessary to prevent further minor over reaction. LfpHUNK is ordered to receive 10 nonsequitous responses in threads of his creation. OP is ordered to learn Pro Tool's short cuts and to understand that Pro Tools is a glorified tape recorder.
This session of the DSF court is now adjourned.
In the matter of CD v. DH, the Court finds:
OP's post was made in frustration at coming in contact with opaque software. A very reasonable response shared by many who have been forced to use it. The court takes no offense at this post.
DH's initial response of, "a poor artist is always the first to blame their tools" is fairly diggy. The Court finds this statement to be 60% diggy, as the reasonable inference to be drawn from this statement is that OP is a poor artist.
The statement was also fairly unrelated to the OP's initial post. OP's argument was merely that Pro tools is unnecessarily difficult to learn or use, especially in comparison to other DAW software on the market.
Also of note, it is the poor craftsman who blames their tools, not the artist. There is a significant distinction between these terms that should not be lost.
CD's offense to DH's statement, and the inference reasonably drawn from it, is warranted. However, CD's level of offense, as exhibited in his first post of, "wow what a wack thing to say in response to a post like that," exceeds the reasonable level of offense to be taken from DH's initial post by 5%.
LfpHUNK's statement that, "cloak and dagger your logic and thought process is so logical you would make a good computer programmer," is found by the court be unwarranted as the second post of a thread is reasonably expected to refer to the initial post or the poster. This logical conclusion is hardly above the threshold exhibited by children, primates or even canines given the proper conditioning.
To balance the equities in the case of CD v. DH the Court hereby orders DH to ten push ups and issues a reminder to watch your manners. CD is ordered to drag 120 grit sandpaper across your palms five times. This will thicken your man hand skin by approximately 5%, the amount necessary to prevent further minor over reaction. LfpHUNK is ordered to receive 10 nonsequitous responses in threads of his creation. OP is ordered to learn Pro Tool's short cuts and to understand that Pro Tools is a glorified tape recorder.
This session of the DSF court is now adjourned.
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
Brilliant 

-
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
- Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
- Contact:
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
Or DH can edit his original post to say something like "It's not the tools, it's how you use them" or however the saying goes and everyone agrees and everyone enjoys a round of beers.
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
nah i'll just have the round of beers and stick by my original wording. anyone who takes offense can remove the sand from their vaginasabZ wrote:Or DH can edit his original post to say something like "It's not the tools, it's how you use them" or however the saying goes and everyone agrees and everyone enjoys a round of beers.

push ups done
- cosmic revenge
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Bay Area
- Contact:
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
i started on pro tools, and have been using it for 3 years now and its the only daw i use, aside from ableton and occasionally reason. i can see how it would be really frustrating for someone just starting or is used to midi friendly programs. but like anything else, its all about what you feel comfortable with and how much time you've invested in learning it inside and out. for me, pro tools 8 is awesome. you can do pretty much everything you can do with other daws, they've incorporated good midi tools, and for someone like me who likes to sample and cut up audio, process it, and edit it to a fine point, i've found it perfect for my workflow. like i said, this is probably due to the fact that i have spent hundreds of hours using it. you can't really genuinely criticize something unless you've spent a good deal of time using it. i can also understand how you may resent the program due to being forced to use it in class - that can take the fun out of anything.
as a sidenote, i believe dj shadow only used some turntables, an mpc and pro tools to do all the editing which resulted in the legendary Endtroducing.
the best advice i can think of is to stick with one program you are somewhat comfortable with and stay with that. jumping around with other programs will most likely just make you mediocre/average at a few set of programs instead of a master at one.
as a sidenote, i believe dj shadow only used some turntables, an mpc and pro tools to do all the editing which resulted in the legendary Endtroducing.
the best advice i can think of is to stick with one program you are somewhat comfortable with and stay with that. jumping around with other programs will most likely just make you mediocre/average at a few set of programs instead of a master at one.

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
I might have to edit my post now to just say "beer". Good enough imo.deadly habit wrote:nah i'll just have the round of beers and stick by my original wording. anyone who takes offense can remove the sand from their vaginasabZ wrote:Or DH can edit his original post to say something like "It's not the tools, it's how you use them" or however the saying goes and everyone agrees and everyone enjoys a round of beers.
push ups done
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
There are few winners in the courts of equity.cloak and dagger wrote:whoever wins...WE LOSE![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
- Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
- Contact:
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
nowaysj wrote:There are few winners in the courts of equity.cloak and dagger wrote:whoever wins...WE LOSE![]()
![]()
especially in the case of Alien v Predator
-
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
nowaysj wrote:Hear ye, hear ye, Court is now in session!
In the matter of CD v. DH, the Court finds:
OP's post was made in frustration at coming in contact with opaque software. A very reasonable response shared by many who have been forced to use it. The court takes no offense at this post.
DH's initial response of, "a poor artist is always the first to blame their tools" is fairly diggy. The Court finds this statement to be 60% diggy, as the reasonable inference to be drawn from this statement is that OP is a poor artist.
The statement was also fairly unrelated to the OP's initial post. OP's argument was merely that Pro tools is unnecessarily difficult to learn or use, especially in comparison to other DAW software on the market.
Also of note, it is the poor craftsman who blames their tools, not the artist. There is a significant distinction between these terms that should not be lost.
CD's offense to DH's statement, and the inference reasonably drawn from it, is warranted. However, CD's level of offense, as exhibited in his first post of, "wow what a wack thing to say in response to a post like that," exceeds the reasonable level of offense to be taken from DH's initial post by 5%.
LfpHUNK's statement that, "cloak and dagger your logic and thought process is so logical you would make a good computer programmer," is found by the court be unwarranted as the second post of a thread is reasonably expected to refer to the initial post or the poster. This logical conclusion is hardly above the threshold exhibited by children, primates or even canines given the proper conditioning.
To balance the equities in the case of CD v. DH the Court hereby orders DH to ten push ups and issues a reminder to watch your manners. CD is ordered to drag 120 grit sandpaper across your palms five times. This will thicken your man hand skin by approximately 5%, the amount necessary to prevent further minor over reaction. LfpHUNK is ordered to receive 10 nonsequitous responses in threads of his creation. OP is ordered to learn Pro Tool's short cuts and to understand that Pro Tools is a glorified tape recorder.
This session of the DSF court is now adjourned.

(99% actually on inside, 1% minor exhalation via nostrils.)
-
- Posts: 2321
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:21 pm
- Location: going nomadic
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
I love the sounds in Reason
...But trying to make a song in it is about as challenging as Christoper Reeves knitting a new cape
...But trying to make a song in it is about as challenging as Christoper Reeves knitting a new cape
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
Are you implying the reason sequencer isn't good?BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:I love the sounds in Reason
...But trying to make a song in it is about as challenging as Christoper Reeves knitting a new cape
If there is one thing that I love about reason, is it works so extremely fast. I can lay a basic track down in under 10 minutes. (sure, not making patches and looking for samples, but that is not part of the DAW)
paravrais wrote:It genuinely was a couple of years before I realised it was pronounced re-noise not ren-wah
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
hahahanowaysj wrote:Hear ye, hear ye, Court is now in session!
In the matter of CD v. DH, the Court finds:
OP's post was made in frustration at coming in contact with opaque software. A very reasonable response shared by many who have been forced to use it. The court takes no offense at this post.
DH's initial response of, "a poor artist is always the first to blame their tools" is fairly diggy. The Court finds this statement to be 60% diggy, as the reasonable inference to be drawn from this statement is that OP is a poor artist.
The statement was also fairly unrelated to the OP's initial post. OP's argument was merely that Pro tools is unnecessarily difficult to learn or use, especially in comparison to other DAW software on the market.
Also of note, it is the poor craftsman who blames their tools, not the artist. There is a significant distinction between these terms that should not be lost.
CD's offense to DH's statement, and the inference reasonably drawn from it, is warranted. However, CD's level of offense, as exhibited in his first post of, "wow what a wack thing to say in response to a post like that," exceeds the reasonable level of offense to be taken from DH's initial post by 5%.
LfpHUNK's statement that, "cloak and dagger your logic and thought process is so logical you would make a good computer programmer," is found by the court be unwarranted as the second post of a thread is reasonably expected to refer to the initial post or the poster. This logical conclusion is hardly above the threshold exhibited by children, primates or even canines given the proper conditioning.
To balance the equities in the case of CD v. DH the Court hereby orders DH to ten push ups and issues a reminder to watch your manners. CD is ordered to drag 120 grit sandpaper across your palms five times. This will thicken your man hand skin by approximately 5%, the amount necessary to prevent further minor over reaction. LfpHUNK is ordered to receive 10 nonsequitous responses in threads of his creation. OP is ordered to learn Pro Tool's short cuts and to understand that Pro Tools is a glorified tape recorder.
This session of the DSF court is now adjourned.
awesome
The Judge has spoken
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
too bad i operate outside the long arm of the lawFSTZ wrote:hahahanowaysj wrote:Hear ye, hear ye, Court is now in session!
In the matter of CD v. DH, the Court finds:
OP's post was made in frustration at coming in contact with opaque software. A very reasonable response shared by many who have been forced to use it. The court takes no offense at this post.
DH's initial response of, "a poor artist is always the first to blame their tools" is fairly diggy. The Court finds this statement to be 60% diggy, as the reasonable inference to be drawn from this statement is that OP is a poor artist.
The statement was also fairly unrelated to the OP's initial post. OP's argument was merely that Pro tools is unnecessarily difficult to learn or use, especially in comparison to other DAW software on the market.
Also of note, it is the poor craftsman who blames their tools, not the artist. There is a significant distinction between these terms that should not be lost.
CD's offense to DH's statement, and the inference reasonably drawn from it, is warranted. However, CD's level of offense, as exhibited in his first post of, "wow what a wack thing to say in response to a post like that," exceeds the reasonable level of offense to be taken from DH's initial post by 5%.
LfpHUNK's statement that, "cloak and dagger your logic and thought process is so logical you would make a good computer programmer," is found by the court be unwarranted as the second post of a thread is reasonably expected to refer to the initial post or the poster. This logical conclusion is hardly above the threshold exhibited by children, primates or even canines given the proper conditioning.
To balance the equities in the case of CD v. DH the Court hereby orders DH to ten push ups and issues a reminder to watch your manners. CD is ordered to drag 120 grit sandpaper across your palms five times. This will thicken your man hand skin by approximately 5%, the amount necessary to prevent further minor over reaction. LfpHUNK is ordered to receive 10 nonsequitous responses in threads of his creation. OP is ordered to learn Pro Tool's short cuts and to understand that Pro Tools is a glorified tape recorder.
This session of the DSF court is now adjourned.
awesome
The Judge has spoken

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
Hold it right there, you use the stock sounds in Reason? I mean you can do whatever you want that is the beauty of production but I used Reason for 6 years and I am proud to say I never used a sound that came on the cd nor refills. Make your own shit!BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:I love the sounds in Reason
-
- Posts: 2321
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:21 pm
- Location: going nomadic
Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
Whoaaa easy with the yeast infection!abZ wrote:Hold it right there, you use the stock sounds in Reason? I mean you can do whatever you want that is the beauty of production but I used Reason for 6 years and I am proud to say I never used a sound that came on the cd nor refills. Make your own shit!BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:I love the sounds in Reason
I've always made/modded my own sounds, I just meant the synths in reason pack a punch, giving a great starting point for adding a final instrument to a song to bring it out, then manipulate the sounds through live etc. Besides, I've only had it a week, so just basically tweaking up the thor synth etc to figure out the dynamics and shite.
Try saying 'Make your own shit' to an average vinyl spinning DJ next time!

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
Sorry bleeding all over the place hereBLAHBLAHJAH wrote:Whoaaa easy with the yeast infection!abZ wrote:Hold it right there, you use the stock sounds in Reason? I mean you can do whatever you want that is the beauty of production but I used Reason for 6 years and I am proud to say I never used a sound that came on the cd nor refills. Make your own shit!BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:I love the sounds in Reason
I've always made/modded my own sounds, I just meant the synths in reason pack a punch, giving a great starting point for adding a final instrument to a song to bring it out, then manipulate the sounds through live etc. Besides, I've only had it a week, so just basically tweaking up the thor synth etc to figure out the dynamics and shite.
Try saying 'Make your own shit' to an average vinyl spinning DJ next time!

Saying make your own shit to a guy that is ermm... trying to make his own shit sounds legit to me. That is apples, djs are oranges

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...
Well... hadn't been on here in a few days...
Its amazing to see how quickly egos can clash on the internet.
My question was answered a while ago.. and thanks to all who ACTUALLY contributed something of VALUE.
And thanks to those who defended my point/question.. I don't feel that a production forum where people are SUPPOSED to be helping each other is a proper setting for unprovoked jabs at the integrity of others.
Anyways, it has shown me a lot about the character of some of the members on here, and I have a better understanding of who's opinion I should hold with higher regard..
Thanks again..
-Novelty
Its amazing to see how quickly egos can clash on the internet.
My question was answered a while ago.. and thanks to all who ACTUALLY contributed something of VALUE.
And thanks to those who defended my point/question.. I don't feel that a production forum where people are SUPPOSED to be helping each other is a proper setting for unprovoked jabs at the integrity of others.
Anyways, it has shown me a lot about the character of some of the members on here, and I have a better understanding of who's opinion I should hold with higher regard..
Thanks again..
-Novelty
dubsteppin' junglist.


kejk wrote: By the first 4 posts you have made I already like you more than 90% of this forum.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests