Worst standard DAW ever...

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
Sharmaji
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by Sharmaji » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:18 am

mixin' down a tune for release in PT tomorrow. enjoying the prospect of taking off my "writing, let's get this shit messed up!!!" hat and putting on my responsible "mixer who worries about gain structure and the dancefloor in equal measure" hat.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by nowaysj » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:42 am

Hear ye, hear ye, Court is now in session!

In the matter of CD v. DH, the Court finds:

OP's post was made in frustration at coming in contact with opaque software. A very reasonable response shared by many who have been forced to use it. The court takes no offense at this post.

DH's initial response of, "a poor artist is always the first to blame their tools" is fairly diggy. The Court finds this statement to be 60% diggy, as the reasonable inference to be drawn from this statement is that OP is a poor artist.

The statement was also fairly unrelated to the OP's initial post. OP's argument was merely that Pro tools is unnecessarily difficult to learn or use, especially in comparison to other DAW software on the market.

Also of note, it is the poor craftsman who blames their tools, not the artist. There is a significant distinction between these terms that should not be lost.

CD's offense to DH's statement, and the inference reasonably drawn from it, is warranted. However, CD's level of offense, as exhibited in his first post of, "wow what a wack thing to say in response to a post like that," exceeds the reasonable level of offense to be taken from DH's initial post by 5%.

LfpHUNK's statement that, "cloak and dagger your logic and thought process is so logical you would make a good computer programmer," is found by the court be unwarranted as the second post of a thread is reasonably expected to refer to the initial post or the poster. This logical conclusion is hardly above the threshold exhibited by children, primates or even canines given the proper conditioning.

To balance the equities in the case of CD v. DH the Court hereby orders DH to ten push ups and issues a reminder to watch your manners. CD is ordered to drag 120 grit sandpaper across your palms five times. This will thicken your man hand skin by approximately 5%, the amount necessary to prevent further minor over reaction. LfpHUNK is ordered to receive 10 nonsequitous responses in threads of his creation. OP is ordered to learn Pro Tool's short cuts and to understand that Pro Tools is a glorified tape recorder.

This session of the DSF court is now adjourned.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
drokkr
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by drokkr » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:48 am

Brilliant :lol:

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by cloak and dagger » Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:09 am

whoever wins...WE LOSE :!: :!: :!:

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by abZ » Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:31 am

Or DH can edit his original post to say something like "It's not the tools, it's how you use them" or however the saying goes and everyone agrees and everyone enjoys a round of beers.

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by deadly_habit » Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:46 am

abZ wrote:Or DH can edit his original post to say something like "It's not the tools, it's how you use them" or however the saying goes and everyone agrees and everyone enjoys a round of beers.
nah i'll just have the round of beers and stick by my original wording. anyone who takes offense can remove the sand from their vaginas :6:
push ups done

User avatar
cosmic revenge
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Bay Area
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by cosmic revenge » Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:47 am

i started on pro tools, and have been using it for 3 years now and its the only daw i use, aside from ableton and occasionally reason. i can see how it would be really frustrating for someone just starting or is used to midi friendly programs. but like anything else, its all about what you feel comfortable with and how much time you've invested in learning it inside and out. for me, pro tools 8 is awesome. you can do pretty much everything you can do with other daws, they've incorporated good midi tools, and for someone like me who likes to sample and cut up audio, process it, and edit it to a fine point, i've found it perfect for my workflow. like i said, this is probably due to the fact that i have spent hundreds of hours using it. you can't really genuinely criticize something unless you've spent a good deal of time using it. i can also understand how you may resent the program due to being forced to use it in class - that can take the fun out of anything.

as a sidenote, i believe dj shadow only used some turntables, an mpc and pro tools to do all the editing which resulted in the legendary Endtroducing.

the best advice i can think of is to stick with one program you are somewhat comfortable with and stay with that. jumping around with other programs will most likely just make you mediocre/average at a few set of programs instead of a master at one. 8)

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by abZ » Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:52 am

deadly habit wrote:
abZ wrote:Or DH can edit his original post to say something like "It's not the tools, it's how you use them" or however the saying goes and everyone agrees and everyone enjoys a round of beers.
nah i'll just have the round of beers and stick by my original wording. anyone who takes offense can remove the sand from their vaginas :6:
push ups done
I might have to edit my post now to just say "beer". Good enough imo.

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by nowaysj » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:42 am

cloak and dagger wrote:whoever wins...WE LOSE :!: :!: :!:
There are few winners in the courts of equity.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
jsills
Posts: 1284
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:40 am
Location: Brooklyn
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by jsills » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:20 pm

:lol: Wow.

PT :|

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by cloak and dagger » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:28 pm

nowaysj wrote:
cloak and dagger wrote:whoever wins...WE LOSE :!: :!: :!:
There are few winners in the courts of equity.

especially in the case of Alien v Predator

paradigm_x
Posts: 2164
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:43 am

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by paradigm_x » Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:19 pm

nowaysj wrote:Hear ye, hear ye, Court is now in session!

In the matter of CD v. DH, the Court finds:

OP's post was made in frustration at coming in contact with opaque software. A very reasonable response shared by many who have been forced to use it. The court takes no offense at this post.

DH's initial response of, "a poor artist is always the first to blame their tools" is fairly diggy. The Court finds this statement to be 60% diggy, as the reasonable inference to be drawn from this statement is that OP is a poor artist.

The statement was also fairly unrelated to the OP's initial post. OP's argument was merely that Pro tools is unnecessarily difficult to learn or use, especially in comparison to other DAW software on the market.

Also of note, it is the poor craftsman who blames their tools, not the artist. There is a significant distinction between these terms that should not be lost.

CD's offense to DH's statement, and the inference reasonably drawn from it, is warranted. However, CD's level of offense, as exhibited in his first post of, "wow what a wack thing to say in response to a post like that," exceeds the reasonable level of offense to be taken from DH's initial post by 5%.

LfpHUNK's statement that, "cloak and dagger your logic and thought process is so logical you would make a good computer programmer," is found by the court be unwarranted as the second post of a thread is reasonably expected to refer to the initial post or the poster. This logical conclusion is hardly above the threshold exhibited by children, primates or even canines given the proper conditioning.

To balance the equities in the case of CD v. DH the Court hereby orders DH to ten push ups and issues a reminder to watch your manners. CD is ordered to drag 120 grit sandpaper across your palms five times. This will thicken your man hand skin by approximately 5%, the amount necessary to prevent further minor over reaction. LfpHUNK is ordered to receive 10 nonsequitous responses in threads of his creation. OP is ordered to learn Pro Tool's short cuts and to understand that Pro Tools is a glorified tape recorder.

This session of the DSF court is now adjourned.
:lol:

(99% actually on inside, 1% minor exhalation via nostrils.)

BLAHBLAHJAH
Posts: 2321
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:21 pm
Location: going nomadic

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by BLAHBLAHJAH » Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:38 pm

I love the sounds in Reason
...But trying to make a song in it is about as challenging as Christoper Reeves knitting a new cape

User avatar
kejk
Posts: 1901
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:51 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by kejk » Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:35 pm

BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:I love the sounds in Reason
...But trying to make a song in it is about as challenging as Christoper Reeves knitting a new cape
Are you implying the reason sequencer isn't good?

If there is one thing that I love about reason, is it works so extremely fast. I can lay a basic track down in under 10 minutes. (sure, not making patches and looking for samples, but that is not part of the DAW)
paravrais wrote:It genuinely was a couple of years before I realised it was pronounced re-noise not ren-wah :i:

User avatar
FSTZ
Posts: 7706
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 am
Location: Cookingham

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by FSTZ » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:34 pm

nowaysj wrote:Hear ye, hear ye, Court is now in session!

In the matter of CD v. DH, the Court finds:

OP's post was made in frustration at coming in contact with opaque software. A very reasonable response shared by many who have been forced to use it. The court takes no offense at this post.

DH's initial response of, "a poor artist is always the first to blame their tools" is fairly diggy. The Court finds this statement to be 60% diggy, as the reasonable inference to be drawn from this statement is that OP is a poor artist.

The statement was also fairly unrelated to the OP's initial post. OP's argument was merely that Pro tools is unnecessarily difficult to learn or use, especially in comparison to other DAW software on the market.

Also of note, it is the poor craftsman who blames their tools, not the artist. There is a significant distinction between these terms that should not be lost.

CD's offense to DH's statement, and the inference reasonably drawn from it, is warranted. However, CD's level of offense, as exhibited in his first post of, "wow what a wack thing to say in response to a post like that," exceeds the reasonable level of offense to be taken from DH's initial post by 5%.

LfpHUNK's statement that, "cloak and dagger your logic and thought process is so logical you would make a good computer programmer," is found by the court be unwarranted as the second post of a thread is reasonably expected to refer to the initial post or the poster. This logical conclusion is hardly above the threshold exhibited by children, primates or even canines given the proper conditioning.

To balance the equities in the case of CD v. DH the Court hereby orders DH to ten push ups and issues a reminder to watch your manners. CD is ordered to drag 120 grit sandpaper across your palms five times. This will thicken your man hand skin by approximately 5%, the amount necessary to prevent further minor over reaction. LfpHUNK is ordered to receive 10 nonsequitous responses in threads of his creation. OP is ordered to learn Pro Tool's short cuts and to understand that Pro Tools is a glorified tape recorder.

This session of the DSF court is now adjourned.
hahaha

awesome

The Judge has spoken

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by deadly_habit » Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:05 pm

FSTZ wrote:
nowaysj wrote:Hear ye, hear ye, Court is now in session!

In the matter of CD v. DH, the Court finds:

OP's post was made in frustration at coming in contact with opaque software. A very reasonable response shared by many who have been forced to use it. The court takes no offense at this post.

DH's initial response of, "a poor artist is always the first to blame their tools" is fairly diggy. The Court finds this statement to be 60% diggy, as the reasonable inference to be drawn from this statement is that OP is a poor artist.

The statement was also fairly unrelated to the OP's initial post. OP's argument was merely that Pro tools is unnecessarily difficult to learn or use, especially in comparison to other DAW software on the market.

Also of note, it is the poor craftsman who blames their tools, not the artist. There is a significant distinction between these terms that should not be lost.

CD's offense to DH's statement, and the inference reasonably drawn from it, is warranted. However, CD's level of offense, as exhibited in his first post of, "wow what a wack thing to say in response to a post like that," exceeds the reasonable level of offense to be taken from DH's initial post by 5%.

LfpHUNK's statement that, "cloak and dagger your logic and thought process is so logical you would make a good computer programmer," is found by the court be unwarranted as the second post of a thread is reasonably expected to refer to the initial post or the poster. This logical conclusion is hardly above the threshold exhibited by children, primates or even canines given the proper conditioning.

To balance the equities in the case of CD v. DH the Court hereby orders DH to ten push ups and issues a reminder to watch your manners. CD is ordered to drag 120 grit sandpaper across your palms five times. This will thicken your man hand skin by approximately 5%, the amount necessary to prevent further minor over reaction. LfpHUNK is ordered to receive 10 nonsequitous responses in threads of his creation. OP is ordered to learn Pro Tool's short cuts and to understand that Pro Tools is a glorified tape recorder.

This session of the DSF court is now adjourned.
hahaha

awesome

The Judge has spoken
too bad i operate outside the long arm of the law 8)

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by abZ » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:19 pm

BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:I love the sounds in Reason
Hold it right there, you use the stock sounds in Reason? I mean you can do whatever you want that is the beauty of production but I used Reason for 6 years and I am proud to say I never used a sound that came on the cd nor refills. Make your own shit!

BLAHBLAHJAH
Posts: 2321
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:21 pm
Location: going nomadic

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by BLAHBLAHJAH » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:25 pm

abZ wrote:
BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:I love the sounds in Reason
Hold it right there, you use the stock sounds in Reason? I mean you can do whatever you want that is the beauty of production but I used Reason for 6 years and I am proud to say I never used a sound that came on the cd nor refills. Make your own shit!
Whoaaa easy with the yeast infection!
I've always made/modded my own sounds, I just meant the synths in reason pack a punch, giving a great starting point for adding a final instrument to a song to bring it out, then manipulate the sounds through live etc. Besides, I've only had it a week, so just basically tweaking up the thor synth etc to figure out the dynamics and shite.

Try saying 'Make your own shit' to an average vinyl spinning DJ next time!
:s:

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by abZ » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:37 pm

BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:
abZ wrote:
BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:I love the sounds in Reason
Hold it right there, you use the stock sounds in Reason? I mean you can do whatever you want that is the beauty of production but I used Reason for 6 years and I am proud to say I never used a sound that came on the cd nor refills. Make your own shit!
Whoaaa easy with the yeast infection!
I've always made/modded my own sounds, I just meant the synths in reason pack a punch, giving a great starting point for adding a final instrument to a song to bring it out, then manipulate the sounds through live etc. Besides, I've only had it a week, so just basically tweaking up the thor synth etc to figure out the dynamics and shite.

Try saying 'Make your own shit' to an average vinyl spinning DJ next time!
Sorry bleeding all over the place here :roll:

Saying make your own shit to a guy that is ermm... trying to make his own shit sounds legit to me. That is apples, djs are oranges :wink: So you make your own shit, fine. I am happy to hear it.

User avatar
Novelty
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:47 am
Location: San Diego, California
Contact:

Re: Worst standard DAW ever...

Post by Novelty » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:30 pm

Well... hadn't been on here in a few days...

Its amazing to see how quickly egos can clash on the internet.

My question was answered a while ago.. and thanks to all who ACTUALLY contributed something of VALUE.

And thanks to those who defended my point/question.. I don't feel that a production forum where people are SUPPOSED to be helping each other is a proper setting for unprovoked jabs at the integrity of others.

Anyways, it has shown me a lot about the character of some of the members on here, and I have a better understanding of who's opinion I should hold with higher regard..

Thanks again..

-Novelty
dubsteppin' junglist.

Image
kejk wrote: By the first 4 posts you have made I already like you more than 90% of this forum.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests