From this whole forum's perspective, i guess you could say i'm a dubstep noobjuntistik wrote:I think that the really mainstream/well known stuff stuff (BOREgore, Ruskoetc.) all serves a purpose, and that is to get people into Dubstep in the first place. Not everyone can discover Dubstep through Dubstep Warz and the original dubstep of years ago (Fack im lucky I found it then..). People's interests progress and they eventually like more underground/unheard Dubstep anyway
After that there are always going to be the people pushing the futuristic melodic sound while others push the heavy grit. Honestly i feel like the melodic shit is exploding at this point, and that's what i prefer, but i hope that in the future there will be heavy melodic grit.
but honestly i would say the future of music as a whole will be one genre with all types of shit mixed in.
besides country
![]()
![]()
But it's true, the first dubstep i ever heard was Rusko's Essential Mix because it was something i never heard before and it came out of nowhere.
Since then i've grown to appreciate two different types of dubstep; the loud and fun dubstep, and the toned down and more 'chill' dubstep.
But when sharing dubstep with friends, you can't introduce them to the chill dubstep first... you have to amaze them with the fun side of dubstep. Besides, dubstep is just the name of a genre, i think there should be some division when calling all types of dubstep the same thing... Because in reality they are very different...
I have a very open mind, and try to ignore the elitist opinions basically just fuming out of this forum, but for the sake of the genres themselves, get over the name dubstep and just let the music evolve without being mad that the louder dubstep is becoming more popular (as you said Rusko/Boregore)
edit: tl;dr: i love the loud/overly-filth dubstep and the chill dubstep that the elitists like, but for organizations sake, separate the two into subdivisions of dubstep. yeah.