Should drugs be legal?
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Re: Should drugs be legal?
No, I see everyday at work the worst of drugs; instead they should be decriminalised for users instead and dealers should face criminal charges.
-
- Posts: 2021
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:49 am
Re: Should drugs be legal?
Dead Rats wrote:Not in this day or age. People are too stupid, especially young people.
collige wrote:some stay dry and others feel the pain.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
Make it legal, people will grow up; sooner or later.
The amount of people dying from the illegal drug trafficing is crazy, if it wasn't such a controversial problem then charities all over the place would be protesting for this to stop. A regulated drug system would get away from alot of the problems we have now. Coke with all the rat poisen taken out is gonna stop alot of the OD's surely.. Not to mention the tax the government could get out of it, and all the time police spend doing trivial drugs tasks while they could be tackling REAL problems in society.
To me it seems the only thing holding drugs being legalised held back is this more right wing "drugs are evil, kill people and everyone who ever does them is a homeless crackfeind trying to mug me" veiw.
The amount of people dying from the illegal drug trafficing is crazy, if it wasn't such a controversial problem then charities all over the place would be protesting for this to stop. A regulated drug system would get away from alot of the problems we have now. Coke with all the rat poisen taken out is gonna stop alot of the OD's surely.. Not to mention the tax the government could get out of it, and all the time police spend doing trivial drugs tasks while they could be tackling REAL problems in society.
To me it seems the only thing holding drugs being legalised held back is this more right wing "drugs are evil, kill people and everyone who ever does them is a homeless crackfeind trying to mug me" veiw.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
DRTY wrote:no.
There's too many idiots about, look at all the problems alcohol causes.
-
- Posts: 5929
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:40 pm
- Location: In that palace in the sun
Re: Should drugs be legal?
This really.firky wrote:No, I see everyday at work the worst of drugs; instead they should be decriminalised for users instead and dealers should face criminal charges.
"...we now pause to test the soul of the Steppenwolf"
Re: Should drugs be legal?
Decriminalisation can be just as bad or worse though. You might not do jail time, but you are branded a criminal by the government. Depending on the countries particular laws, usually it means it goes on your permanent record, and follows you around for life. You can also forget about any sort of government benefits, student loans, a decent job, or similar things.Motorway to Roswell wrote:This really.firky wrote:No, I see everyday at work the worst of drugs; instead they should be decriminalised for users instead and dealers should face criminal charges.
In my opinion...It comes down to pharmaceutical companies and lobbyists in most cases. They don't want people growing their own medicine, or getting it from other sources, plain and simple.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
When I'm a pensioner I really fucking hope some decent drugs are legal. I'm not sitting around watching our generation's equivalent of Judy Finnigan without a massive cunting bifter on.kay wrote:I'm not sure it's the pensioners who are bothered to be honest.
Meus equus tuo altior est
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
little miss sunshine grandad.
'Live Loops, Sleep Snares, Breathe Beats'
http://soundcloud.com/antlionuk
http://www.mixcloud.com/AntlionUK/
http://soundcloud.com/antlionuk
http://www.mixcloud.com/AntlionUK/
Nevalo wrote:All right. But you tell that slag, that in the ghetto, washing non-colourfast synthetics at 60 degrees could cost you your life...
DRTY wrote:Nan is up there with my cats. Harm them; pay with your life.
wub wrote:Shenanigans
ch3 wrote:shenanigans
Re: Should drugs be legal?
There are some utopian views being expressed in this thread but the reality is that the general populace of this country don't consume anything in moderation. The way alcohol is consumed is ridiculous despite the widespread education of the negative consequences.Dead Rats wrote:Not in this day or age. People are too stupid, especially young people.
Look at the Methadrone abuse at the moment, it's being treated like sherbert.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
Couldn't that be argued to be because of our "ashamed" attitude towards drink and drugs? We seem to have a national bias towards abstinence followed by massive binges where we essentially swing from "Ooh, I'm such a healthy bastard" to "FUCK IT, I want to feel SHIT tomorrow!" in the space of a couple of pints.danoldboy wrote:There are some utopian views being expressed in this thread but the reality is that the general populace of this country don't consume anything in moderation. The way alcohol is consumed is ridiculous despite the widespread education of the negative consequences.Dead Rats wrote:Not in this day or age. People are too stupid, especially young people.
Look at the Methadrone abuse at the moment, it's being treated like sherbert.
I can't help but think the only way for society to have a healthy attitude to drink and drug use is to be entirely open about it all... the more people are ashamed, the less likely they are to look for help if they do have a problem... and is making addicts criminals helping at all? Doesn't that just attach a stigma to them for the rest of their life?
Should we make alcoholics criminals instead of patients?
Meus equus tuo altior est
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
danoldboy wrote: There are some utopian views being expressed in this thread but the reality is that the general populace of this country don't consume anything in moderation. The way alcohol is consumed is ridiculous despite the widespread education of the negative consequences.
Look at the Methadrone abuse at the moment, it's being treated like sherbert.
In Soviet Russia, the bass feels you.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
That's a fair point, does that shame come from knowing that these actions are harmful to ourselves and yet still continuing with them anyway? In which case to what extent are the authorities responsible for the choices people make?magma wrote:Couldn't that be argued to be because of our "ashamed" attitude towards drink and drugs? We seem to have a national bias towards abstinence followed by massive binges where we essentially swing from "Ooh, I'm such a healthy bastard" to "FUCK IT, I want to feel SHIT tomorrow!" in the space of a couple of pints.danoldboy wrote:There are some utopian views being expressed in this thread but the reality is that the general populace of this country don't consume anything in moderation. The way alcohol is consumed is ridiculous despite the widespread education of the negative consequences.Dead Rats wrote:Not in this day or age. People are too stupid, especially young people.
Look at the Methadrone abuse at the moment, it's being treated like sherbert.
I can't help but think the only way for society to have a healthy attitude to drink and drug use is to be entirely open about it all... the more people are ashamed, the less likely they are to look for help if they do have a problem... and is making addicts criminals helping at all? Doesn't that just attach a stigma to them for the rest of their life?
Should we make alcoholics criminals instead of patients?
Addicts criminalise themselves by making the personal choice to take a substance that is illegal.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
I think a lot of the shame is historical... the Victorians and most of Britain pre-WW2 were pretty keen on abstinence from all drugs, drink included. The US even went as far as alcohol prohibition (which led to a mighty similar situation as we have now with illegal drugs - organised crime took over and loads more people got addicted, quality of alcohol dropped to high strength moonshine... equivalent to high strength skunk on the black market?).danoldboy wrote:That's a fair point, does that shame come from knowing that these actions are harmful to ourselves and yet still continuing with them anyway? In which case to what extent are the authorities responsible for the choices people make?
Addicts criminalise themselves by making the personal choice to take a substance that is illegal.
We're only 2 or 3 generations removed from that and we're already incredibly liberal compared to those attitudes... as it becomes more and more normal to use different substances, so it'll become more and more expected that you'll do so in moderation.
I don't see any reason why Whisky, Rum, Vodka etc can be sold legally in supermarkets in 1.5 litre bottles (enough to constitute a fatal dose in many) but we can't be trusted to show the same common sense with other substances.
Meus equus tuo altior est
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
ganja, yes. everything else, no
Essential Mix Archiving since 1997
Any mix that's on Mixcloud or includes Skrillex in the playlist will be ignored.
Any mix that's on Mixcloud or includes Skrillex in the playlist will be ignored.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
Interesting article in relation to your point about historical alcohol consumption:magma wrote:I think a lot of the shame is historical... the Victorians and most of Britain pre-WW2 were pretty keen on abstinence from all drugs, drink included. The US even went as far as alcohol prohibition (which led to a mighty similar situation as we have now with illegal drugs - organised crime took over and loads more people got addicted, quality of alcohol dropped to high strength moonshine... equivalent to high strength skunk on the black market?).danoldboy wrote:That's a fair point, does that shame come from knowing that these actions are harmful to ourselves and yet still continuing with them anyway? In which case to what extent are the authorities responsible for the choices people make?
Addicts criminalise themselves by making the personal choice to take a substance that is illegal.
We're only 2 or 3 generations removed from that and we're already incredibly liberal compared to those attitudes... as it becomes more and more normal to use different substances, so it'll become more and more expected that you'll do so in moderation.
I don't see any reason why Whisky, Rum, Vodka etc can be sold legally in supermarkets in 1.5 litre bottles (enough to constitute a fatal dose in many) but we can't be trusted to show the same common sense with other substances.
http://www.historyandpolicy.org/papers/ ... er-62.html
Re: Should drugs be legal?
This. And even if they weren't stupid they should still be illegal imo.feral witchchild wrote:Dead Rats wrote:Not in this day or age. People are too stupid, especially young people.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
That was a great read, thanks!!danoldboy wrote: Interesting article in relation to your point about historical alcohol consumption:
http://www.historyandpolicy.org/papers/ ... er-62.html
Bang on! The existance of the drug industry doesn't force drugs down people's necks. People drink, smoke, snort and otherwise imbibe for their own reasons. Countries should look to tackle the problem (if it is really a problem) by looking at reasons for demand, not supply...It is tempting to dismiss all this unfortunate behaviour as simply young and inexperienced people acting under the influence of alcohol. Remove the substance and youth will return to the normality that pervades the majority of their lives. But this ignores the fact that young people are choosing to drink heavily, in all likelihood knowing the consequences of doing so. They are investing a substantial portion of their personal wealth, not just in the drink but also the package of recreational props that accompany it - music, dancing, clothing, etc - because it gives them a tangible and considered return. We need to understand more about the thrill and excitement of the occasion, the frisson generated by engaging in what is essentially carnivalesque behaviour in which the social norms are challenged and inverted. We need to look more at the performative aspects of binge drinking.
Meus equus tuo altior est
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Re: Should drugs be legal?
The thing is, you can't really trust people. I mean, I'm not sure I can trust myself. If Opiates or Benzos were freely available down the local corner shop or whatever, how hard would it to restrain yourself when you're going through a rough time in your life not to use them regularly enough for them to come a problem.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests