REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

serox · Post by **serox** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:49 am

Brisance wrote:
Corkz wrote:iv'e recently switched from fruity loops to reason 4.

i find reason 4 to be useful- especially the way you can automate things easier

what do you guys prefer?
Wat, you made the switch the wrong way.

I still use both and get good things out of them both.

Reason 4 can be quite good if you set things up good between your mixers and the hardware interface.

Brisance · Post by **Brisance** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:57 am

The main thing I hate about reason, is that if your project gets more complex, the wires get messy and annoying as hell, you cant even hit F12 to escape the mess like in FL you can. I know I can put things in combinators, but then still wires from the lower combinators will dangle in the way. Also FL has 99 mixer channels with inserts so you only have to use one.

Echoi · Post by **Echoi** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:59 pm

Brisance wrote:The main thing I hate about reason, is that if your project gets more complex, the wires get messy and annoying as hell, you cant even hit F12 to escape the mess like in FL you can. I know I can put things in combinators, but then still wires from the lower combinators will dangle in the way. Also FL has 99 mixer channels with inserts so you only have to use one.

do you still use reason then?

i have my track parts all in their own combinators now

kick and snare in one, percussion in another, sub in one, pads, synths etc keeps everything tidy

JFK · Post by **JFK** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:05 pm

Brisance wrote:
Corkz wrote:iv'e recently switched from fruity loops to reason 4.

i find reason 4 to be useful- especially the way you can automate things easier

what do you guys prefer?
Wat, you made the switch the wrong way.

Neurotik · Post by **Neurotik** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:20 pm

I prefer FL in terms of what i can do as i have the VST compatiblity and working with audio samples is alot easier in FL. Still like to use Reason though.

TehBam · Post by **TehBam** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:24 pm

reason 4

nowaysj · Post by **nowaysj** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:33 pm

So funny that this stupid ass thread has gone 5 pages. Still though, fruity runs this town.

Brisance · Post by **Brisance** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:46 pm

Echoi wrote: do you still use reason then?

Not since like autumn 2008

trench · Post by **trench** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:03 pm

You ever wonder if there are other producers in parallel dimensions to ours, but in their dimension... Reason has VST support, Cubase doesn't crash, Logics newest platform runs on a PC, and Fruity Loops has a sequencer that doesn't suck. Maybe Stephen Hawking can get me a ticket on the first bus out.

P.S. I use both FL and Reason. Reason mostly, just cause I know it better.

Corkz · Post by **Corkz** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:01 am

nowaysj wrote:So funny that this stupid ass thread has gone 5 pages. Still though, fruity runs this town.

its not a stupid thread, it's a valid question. if it was a stupid question why did you reply to it?

nowaysj · Post by **nowaysj** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:16 pm

It's pretty clear, isn't it? I'm stoopid.

mr.rush · Post by **mr.rush** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:12 pm

trench wrote:You ever wonder if there are other producers in parallel dimensions to ours, but in their dimension... Reason has VST support, Cubase doesn't crash, Logics newest platform runs on a PC, and Fruity Loops has a sequencer that doesn't suck. Maybe Stephen Hawking can get me a ticket on the first bus out.

THIS!

caro · Post by **caro** » Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:23 pm

mr.rush wrote:
trench wrote:You ever wonder if there are other producers in parallel dimensions to ours, but in their dimension... Reason has VST support, Cubase doesn't crash, Logics newest platform runs on a PC, and Fruity Loops has a sequencer that doesn't suck. Maybe Stephen Hawking can get me a ticket on the first bus out.

THIS!

yessss !
this made me laugh.

kejk · Post by **kejk** » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:45 pm

caro wrote:
mr.rush wrote:
trench wrote:You ever wonder if there are other producers in parallel dimensions to ours, but in their dimension... Reason has VST support, Cubase doesn't crash, Logics newest platform runs on a PC, and Fruity Loops has a sequencer that doesn't suck. Maybe Stephen Hawking can get me a ticket on the first bus out.

THIS!

yessss !
this made me laugh.

Reaper does all that.

DannyDennett · Post by **DannyDennett** » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:48 pm

i make all my stuff in fruity .. and i sumtime rewire reason for certain sounds

but that track in my sig was all done in fruity

dro524 · Post by **dro524** » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:23 am

Been using FL for years and just started on Reason. Not sure why but every track I make on Reason sounds much more professional. All the stuff I make on FL sounds cheap, it takes a lot of EQing and compression to get a nice big sound. Sucks kinda because FL's workflow is so much easier.

bolsty · Post by **bolsty** » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:35 am

serox wrote:

This is why old music is better

They really took the time to learn how to use that box and made decent grooves and decent sounds! with too many options available people dont seem to be making stuff as good I think

This.

kejk · Post by **kejk** » Tue Apr 13, 2010 9:35 am

dro524 wrote:Been using FL for years and just started on Reason. Not sure why but every track I make on Reason sounds much more professional. All the stuff I make on FL sounds cheap, it takes a lot of EQing and compression to get a nice big sound. Sucks kinda because FL's workflow is so much easier.

Probably because you have the default mastering suite in reason turned on...

nowaysj · Post by **nowaysj** » Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:18 am

deadcell · Post by **deadcell** » Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:04 am

used to be reason 4 converted to FL9 aint looked back, vsts are sweet as fuck only bad thing reallys automation. FL stock compressors, reverb n that n EQ is all decent imo. gona convert to logic one day but im quite happy to procrastinate that to fuck

REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Re: REASON 4 OR FRUITY LOOPS?

Who is online