Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
Bodega
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:41 pm

Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by Bodega » Thu Apr 08, 2010 1:55 am

Hi all,

I'm working on a new feature for my production blog and I'm looking for suggestions of producers that use compression, especially side-chained compression, as a creative tool. The classic example is Daft Punk, who just crushed those early records.

I know there's a shitload of mediocre trance and brosteppy wobble that's all about the sidechaining, but I'd like to keep the focus on people doing more cutting-edge stuff.

Any suggestions would be much appreciated!

Matthew
Last edited by Bodega on Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression.

Post by abZ » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:03 am

I use a shit ton of sidechain compression but light on the regular compression. I like what Headhunter and Breakage do with it as well. TBH I think sidechain compression has become fairly standard for all types of dance and defo dubstep, I would have a harder time picking out a tune that didn't have any. I hear young producers all the time where they will have a weak hi-passed kick or they are having trouble getting their drums to stick out and I immediately suggest it. Some people are scared of it and some think that they are a better producer for not using it. I am not sure where that comes from. Actually I think I remember Macc suggesting not using it. I guess but man I pulled my hair out for years trying to mix down until I discovered it for myself.

User avatar
upstateface
Posts: 2607
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: New York, New York (Harlem)

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression.

Post by upstateface » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:12 am

If you're looking for amazing regular compression try Current Value.
knell wrote:i have the weirdest boner right now

aftee
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:43 am

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression.

Post by aftee » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:23 am

abZ wrote:I use a shit ton of sidechain compression but light on the regular compression. I like what Headhunter and Breakage do with it as well. TBH I think sidechain compression has become fairly standard for all types of dance and defo dubstep, I would have a harder time picking out a tune that didn't have any. I hear young producers all the time where they will have a weak hi-passed kick or they are having trouble getting their drums to stick out and I immediately suggest it. Some people are scared of it and some think that they are a better producer for not using it. I am not sure where that comes from. Actually I think I remember Macc suggesting not using it. I guess but man I pulled my hair out for years trying to mix down until I discovered it for myself.
I can't explain how much this has been helping me improve production quality. I also just like the overall sound of sidechaining for some reason, might need to cut back on it a bit. :oops:
gravious wrote:The only reason they are called that is because Mala and Coki used to do a finger-puppet magic show.

However, the pressing plant on their first release misspelt Mystikal Digitz
One third of A.I. (Aftee + I&I Productions)
http://www.facebook.com/aftee
http://www.soundcloud.com/aftee

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression.

Post by abZ » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:36 am

aftee wrote:
abZ wrote:I use a shit ton of sidechain compression but light on the regular compression. I like what Headhunter and Breakage do with it as well. TBH I think sidechain compression has become fairly standard for all types of dance and defo dubstep, I would have a harder time picking out a tune that didn't have any. I hear young producers all the time where they will have a weak hi-passed kick or they are having trouble getting their drums to stick out and I immediately suggest it. Some people are scared of it and some think that they are a better producer for not using it. I am not sure where that comes from. Actually I think I remember Macc suggesting not using it. I guess but man I pulled my hair out for years trying to mix down until I discovered it for myself.
I can't explain how much this has been helping me improve production quality. I also just like the overall sound of sidechaining for some reason, might need to cut back on it a bit. :oops:

Same as me. Basically I like huge subby kicks and huge subby bass I don't know how else to do it. I used to chase my tail for days trying to get the levels right, now it's no problem. I want you to shit your pants when you hear it on a big rig. You just have to learn to be subtle with it. If you are listening to the tune thinking about the side-chain compression then it's probably too much.

User avatar
Bodega
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:41 pm

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression.

Post by Bodega » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:41 am

AbZ: Those people who avoid it are right to some degree: on the whole compression is a bad idea for club music, since it's a way around technical limitations (background noise and dynamic range) that don't exist for club music the same way they do for, say, AM radio.

Plus, dynamic range is a tool to be used creatively, not crushed by compression. There's nothing worse than having a big buildup of noisy swooshing or whatever and then the drop is the same volume as the swooshing. Plus, excessive compression causes ear fatigue.

Upstateface: Just listened to Current Value - Cyrag. Thanks for the suggestion but that compression is just disgusting. The meters don't move at all. They need to read this.

User avatar
Sharmaji
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Contact:

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by Sharmaji » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:49 am

sidechaining is sidechaining-- it keeps things exciting but it's very much it's own sound. it can be awesome, it can be obvious and lame, it can be a crutch, it can be enlightening-- but it's defintely it's own sound.

mastering compression is its own beast-- a lot of vibe and psychoacoustics happen there.

huge amounts of awesome compression? Soundgarden, "superunknown." In EDM there's so much comp on everything in general that it takes like -25db of gain reduction to think "wow, that's compressed." not necesarriyl it's a bad thing, the fight we're fighting is to create superreal, over-emotive soundscapes that make people dance. if insane amounts of compression is what it takes, fine.

of course, things getting REALLY loud after being REALLY quiet... not so bad....
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression.

Post by abZ » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:58 am

Bodega wrote:AbZ: Those people who avoid it are right to some degree: on the whole compression is a bad idea for club music, since it's a way around technical limitations (background noise and dynamic range) that don't exist for club music the same way they do for, say, AM radio.

Plus, dynamic range is a tool to be used creatively, not crushed by compression. There's nothing worse than having a big buildup of noisy swooshing or whatever and then the drop is the same volume as the swooshing. Plus, excessive compression causes ear fatigue.

Upstateface: Just listened to Current Value - Cyrag. Thanks for the suggestion but that compression is just disgusting. The meters don't move at all. They need to read this.
Believe me I maintain a fair bit of dynamics in my music, you will never see one of my tunes look like a brick and I don't think it is a bad idea for my music in particular because I like to use kicks that share around the same frequency range as my bassline. There really isn't any way around it that I can think of. You could tell me to put my kicks in a different range but that just isn't me.

tavravlavish
Posts: 1312
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:47 am
Location: seatroll

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by tavravlavish » Thu Apr 08, 2010 4:44 am

I dont use compression, just because I dont really know how and I dont even wanna bother fucking with it really, ive tried in the past it just seems like a waste of time for what I like to do. Sorry if im not answering the original question, just felt like sharing :)

aftee
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:43 am

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression.

Post by aftee » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:18 am

abZ wrote:
Bodega wrote:AbZ: Those people who avoid it are right to some degree: on the whole compression is a bad idea for club music, since it's a way around technical limitations (background noise and dynamic range) that don't exist for club music the same way they do for, say, AM radio.

Plus, dynamic range is a tool to be used creatively, not crushed by compression. There's nothing worse than having a big buildup of noisy swooshing or whatever and then the drop is the same volume as the swooshing. Plus, excessive compression causes ear fatigue.

Upstateface: Just listened to Current Value - Cyrag. Thanks for the suggestion but that compression is just disgusting. The meters don't move at all. They need to read this.
Believe me I maintain a fair bit of dynamics in my music, you will never see one of my tunes look like a brick and I don't think it is a bad idea for my music in particular because I like to use kicks that share around the same frequency range as my bassline. There really isn't any way around it that I can think of. You could tell me to put my kicks in a different range but that just isn't me.
The only ways I knew to get my kick to somewhat fit in with my sub made the kick completely unappealing to me...I work with whatever I know how to do that gets the best sound in the end. So I hear you on this, sidechaining is like magic. It sounds better than seperating the frequencies so they don't have to fight it out and I don't hear any negative effects.
On top of that, I actually like the end sound it produces. Not just on bass and kicks either...I especially like it on pads.
gravious wrote:The only reason they are called that is because Mala and Coki used to do a finger-puppet magic show.

However, the pressing plant on their first release misspelt Mystikal Digitz
One third of A.I. (Aftee + I&I Productions)
http://www.facebook.com/aftee
http://www.soundcloud.com/aftee

User avatar
narcissus
Posts: 1654
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 5:28 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by narcissus » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:58 am

i try side chainging sometimes, but it never does much for my tunes. mainly because i'm a noob w/ it :lol:
i suppose i might fall in love one day, but i honestly love having everything driving a master compressor in proportion to it's signal strength atm. just a little bit to tighten up, and have drums nice and loud to press it a bit. that gets my mix popping the way i like w/o being too noticeably squished. i love when a sub line comes and pushes down the whole mix a little bit 8) gives it a nice heavy feeling

User avatar
apathesis
Posts: 773
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:11 am
Location: Bristol BS6
Contact:

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by apathesis » Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:15 am

mount kimbie 8)

User avatar
Depone
Posts: 3526
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: South-West UK
Contact:

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by Depone » Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:01 am

J DILLA


serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by serox » Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:39 am

Bodega wrote:Hi all,

I'm working on a new feature for my production blog and I'm looking for suggestions of producers that use compression, especially side-chained compression, as a creative tool. The classic example is Daft Punk, who just crushed those early records.

I know there's a shitload of mediocre trance and brosteppy wobble that's all about the sidechaining, but I'd like to keep the focus on people doing more cutting-edge stuff.

Any suggestions would be much appreciated!

Matthew
This guy was doing it all from 1990.

The Mover was way ahead of his time.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6x4D3V6_ds
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
stappard
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:56 am
Location: se5

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by stappard » Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:45 am

Bodega wrote:Hi all,

I'm working on a new feature for my production blog and I'm looking for suggestions of producers that use compression, especially side-chained compression, as a creative tool. The classic example is Daft Punk, who just crushed those early records.

I know there's a shitload of mediocre trance and brosteppy wobble that's all about the sidechaining, but I'd like to keep the focus on people doing more cutting-edge stuff.

Any suggestions would be much appreciated!

Matthew

Basically everything put out by hipster electro label Ed Banger has some CRAZY compression going.





Actually I love that shit.


thierry_le_dj
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:14 am
Location: sydney/australia
Contact:

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by thierry_le_dj » Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:02 am

yea i think i may use alot of normal compression i get told all the time my sound is much louder than other people track's but am not sure if it's a bad thing
cause i think it sound's ok to me..
tell me if you think i use to much compression in the track in my signature?

i've been trying to do side chain compressing for a while now but been having problem to get it right am still not that gating type of sound every time i give it ago.

User avatar
DZA
Posts: 14609
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Notts

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by DZA » Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:03 am

Original Face wrote:Flying Lotus
jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
Soundcloud
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/

User avatar
Bodega
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:41 pm

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by Bodega » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:34 pm

stappard wrote:Basically everything put out by hipster electro label Ed Banger has some CRAZY compression going.

/snip/

Actually I love that shit.
It's not bad. Super-brash, but it's got something. That Greel track is great.

User avatar
JFK
Posts: 3123
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:48 am

Re: Producers that use really excessive amounts of compression?

Post by JFK » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:49 pm

DZA wrote:
Original Face wrote:Flying Lotus
Sidechains EVERY damn thing!

Wicked sound though.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests