Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows

Vinyl or Digital 2010

Vinyl
43
73%
Digital
16
27%
 
Total votes: 59

schema
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Jersey, United Kingdom
Contact:

Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by schema » Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:55 am

So in 2010 what's your preference when buying tunes?

Do you get it on vinyl if you can?

If a tune was vinyl only, and a limited run, would you be more likely to buy it because of the exclusivity?

If you could order a vinyl direct from the label, and cheaper than chemical/red eye etc would you do it?

Does anyone in play vinyl anymore?

Does it piss digital DJ's off if they can't get a tune the same time it's out on vinyl?
:?:

User avatar
Pistonsbeneath
Posts: 10785
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Croydon
Contact:

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by Pistonsbeneath » Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:09 am

i've moved over to vinyl...not bought anything digitally for a while..

Just seems moral to have to work on a set rather than have it correct mistakes ala serato...ableton is what i used to use and i'll still make intricate studio mixes at home....i have a wealth of music digitally as it is and i do still buy cds if i really want em...

I do like how it makes it more exclusive yes....if you have somebody using ableton or serato after your trainwrecked vinyl set it's nice that they at least don't have lots of tunes you do when they seamlessly switch and blend between every tune making you sound like a shit dj :lol:
http://www.mixcloud.com/garethom/night-tracks-040-pistonsbeneath-guest-mix/

Soundcloud

BUY PISTONSBENEATH 24TH CENTURY EP CDS & DIGITAL

THREAD FOR MY GETDARKER SETS W/ YOUTUBE LINKS, ITUNES & DIRECT DOWNLOAD LINKS

SCA MIX

HEDMUK MIX

bookings - verity at subcultureartists.com

User avatar
phrex
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: bern
Contact:

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by phrex » Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:16 am

vinyl goes first. but i use serato for unreleased tracks from some ninjas and some others.

but it's clearly vinyl!
Legend4ry wrote:Well I am still living in that haze that dubstep is about a dark room with a big system, peoples with their heads down and trigger fingers in the air.
forthcoming 12", spring/summer 2015:
goldplate / war continues

User avatar
brasco
Posts: 3092
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by brasco » Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:51 am

vinyl all day long. it has alot more depth than digital IMO, love the physical control, more entertaining to a crowd than pressing buttons on a cdj, love the physical format, the excitement of finding a rare tune in a shop for £5 and knowing how lucky you are, rather than downloading a ripped WAV from a torrent.

oh and IMO its much more exciting waiting for the postman than watching a download bar.
:e:
Soundcloud
incnic wrote:pictire disc ones track harder than the black ones due to the colopured pgment being magnetsed for the stylus

User avatar
lojik
Posts: 896
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by lojik » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:39 am

schema wrote:
If a tune was vinyl only, and a limited run, would you be more likely to buy it because of the exclusivity?
I'm a sucker for this. I won't be interested in a tune and as soon as I hear that it's running out of copies I instantly want it, and usually end up not playing it much lol.

I prefer vinyl purely because there's less that can go wrong - played last night and one of the DJs was using CDJs and it stopped like 4 times for no reason. Plus alot of tunes are vinyl only.
Out Now:
DD005 - Retrospect
MRS029 - Connected/Lovin' You
DAR010 - Santogold - Shove It (remix) 12"
SET003 - Bob Marley - Is This Love (remix) 12"
Echodub Loves Volume 2 - White Room
FTW Records Digital - Panic Room
FTW Free Compilation - Get Up (a.k.a Symphony)

User avatar
64hz
Posts: 3947
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:34 pm

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by 64hz » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:42 am

brasco wrote:vinyl all day long. it has alot more depth than digital IMO, love the physical control
this. its about being touchy feely.

User avatar
clifford_-
Posts: 4990
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:20 pm
Location: KT14 UK

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by clifford_- » Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:03 pm

lojik wrote: I prefer vinyl purely because there's less that can go wrong - played last night and one of the DJs was using CDJs and it stopped like 4 times for no reason. Plus alot of tunes are vinyl only.
Until the needles start jumping or you hadnt realised theres a massive scratch across one of your vinyls!
Follow me on Twitter- @clifford_i
Image
noam wrote:son
let me break this down for ya
mustard = yellow
HP = brown
Ketchup = red
if ya fuck with the program, someone's gona get hurt... feel me

User avatar
djrobyn
Posts: 4187
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:50 pm

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by djrobyn » Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:05 pm

schema wrote:Do you get it on vinyl if you can?
this.

User avatar
Wolverine
Posts: 2966
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:28 pm
Location: East Midlands, Uk

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by Wolverine » Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:18 pm

Pistonsbeneath wrote:i've moved over to vinyl...not bought anything digitally for a while..

Just seems moral to have to work on a set rather than have it correct mistakes ala serato...ableton is what i used to use and i'll still make intricate studio mixes at home....i have a wealth of music digitally as it is and i do still buy cds if i really want em...

I do like how it makes it more exclusive yes....if you have somebody using ableton or serato after your trainwrecked vinyl set it's nice that they at least don't have lots of tunes you do when they seamlessly switch and blend between every tune making you sound like a shit dj :lol:

whats wrong with serato?? i use it and imo its just like using real vinyl still

i still buy tunes on vinyl if they don't enter the digital world,

disfigured dubz, dmz, swamp for example
DJ WOLVERINE DUBSTEP MIX MAY 2010 - DOWNLOAD HERE:
Soundcloud

Twitter - http://twitter.com/iambyron1
AIM - djwolverinedub

User avatar
The Phantom Banger
Posts: 659
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:13 pm

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by The Phantom Banger » Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:25 pm

Im stuck on vinyl for now, but one day would love the option of something like serato. Just because ive got so many cool tunes as mp3s and wav that i cant play out ar the moment.

User avatar
brasco
Posts: 3092
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by brasco » Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:27 pm

forgot to add quality control. wading through loads of average tunes every week on digital sites to find the gems can be a real chore.

but going onto red eye half the jobs already done for me :wink:
Soundcloud
incnic wrote:pictire disc ones track harder than the black ones due to the colopured pgment being magnetsed for the stylus

User avatar
EBR
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by EBR » Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:31 pm

schema wrote:So in 2010 what's your preference when buying tunes?

Do you get it on vinyl if you can?
Yes.

If a tune was vinyl only, and a limited run, would you be more likely to buy it because of the exclusivity?
The rarity of a record does add to the intrinsic value.

If you could order a vinyl direct from the label, and cheaper than chemical/red eye etc would you do it?
Yes.

Does anyone in play vinyl anymore?
Yes. There are new peeps coming up playing vinyl. There are old school cats playing vinyl. There are big record shops selling thousands in vinyl records every week. Vinyl records to me, are also a bankable commodity. ;)

User avatar
bunzer0
Posts: 7531
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:48 am
Location: Brussels
Contact:

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by bunzer0 » Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:40 pm

again this topic ????
:H:

User avatar
Pistonsbeneath
Posts: 10785
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Croydon
Contact:

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by Pistonsbeneath » Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:48 pm

Wolverine wrote:
Pistonsbeneath wrote:i've moved over to vinyl...not bought anything digitally for a while..

Just seems moral to have to work on a set rather than have it correct mistakes ala serato...ableton is what i used to use and i'll still make intricate studio mixes at home....i have a wealth of music digitally as it is and i do still buy cds if i really want em...

I do like how it makes it more exclusive yes....if you have somebody using ableton or serato after your trainwrecked vinyl set it's nice that they at least don't have lots of tunes you do when they seamlessly switch and blend between every tune making you sound like a shit dj :lol:

whats wrong with serato?? i use it and imo its just like using real vinyl still

i still buy tunes on vinyl if they don't enter the digital world,

disfigured dubz, dmz, swamp for example
nothing wrong with anything man...i just prefer real vinyl....plus you can set serato to assist you with mixing
http://www.mixcloud.com/garethom/night-tracks-040-pistonsbeneath-guest-mix/

Soundcloud

BUY PISTONSBENEATH 24TH CENTURY EP CDS & DIGITAL

THREAD FOR MY GETDARKER SETS W/ YOUTUBE LINKS, ITUNES & DIRECT DOWNLOAD LINKS

SCA MIX

HEDMUK MIX

bookings - verity at subcultureartists.com

User avatar
dutty_switch
Posts: 1425
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:48 pm

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by dutty_switch » Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:57 pm

bunzer0 wrote:again this topic ????
:H:
http://www.mixcloud.com/rough_draft/nye-201112-deep-end-exeter/
capo ultra wrote:House -> Garage -> Dubstep -> Garage -> House

twentyOneDummies
Posts: 352
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:21 pm
Location: Montreal Canada

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by twentyOneDummies » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:48 pm

Digital, import fees are a bitch. I actually had to sift through about 6 crates of old wax yesterday because I don't have room to store it anymore. Hopefully I can make a couple of bucks and it'll find a good home with someone who'll appreciate it.

As are customs apparently, basically every UK DJ that passes through here spins digital, not that I blame em'. Luggage surcharges kill profit margins I guess.
Son Raw
Http://www.mixcloud.com/sonraw
Dubstep & Bass Music Mixes...from SPACE!

Sach O
Http://www.passionweiss.com
Bass, Dubstep, Hip-Hop, Rock, Reggae, Afrobeat: Music

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by fractal » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:57 pm

dutty_switch wrote:
bunzer0 wrote:again this topic ????
:H:

this has been done to DEATH!!! please stop, or if you want to keep talking about it, use one of the other 50 threads made last month on the topic
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

suicidesound
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 1:00 pm
Location: Leicester/Essex

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by suicidesound » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:59 pm

What is the setting on Serato that assists with ones mix?
Image

SuicideSound
Check us out on:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2 ... 275&ref=ts



Jamie Kelly
Artist Agent

+44 (0)7906 978 008

http://www.AcutePromotions.co.uk

User avatar
rbnc
Posts: 1223
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:11 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by rbnc » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:19 pm

I sold my decks a few weeks ago, I really, really regret it already. CD/MP3 sounds really flat and uninspiring. Luckily I didn't sell any of my vinyl off.
Soundcloud


Soundcloud

Decade Myself and Jack Dixon forthcoming on Take Records.

User avatar
bolsty
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:30 am
Location: Fremantle, Australia

Re: Vinyl vs Digital - 2010

Post by bolsty » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:35 pm

brasco wrote:vinyl all day long. it has alot more depth than digital IMO, love the physical control, more entertaining to a crowd than pressing buttons on a cdj, love the physical format, the excitement of finding a rare tune in a shop for £5 and knowing how lucky you are, rather than downloading a ripped WAV from a torrent.

oh and IMO its much more exciting waiting for the postman than watching a download bar.
:e:
:z:
vinyl anyday.
lowpass wrote:It's very easy to go onto beatport and pick up 10 tunes for a tenner, but when you have to think that 20 pounds will get you maybe 3 songs, really makes you take the time to listen and think about what your filling your bag up with

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests