do you think humanity is worth saving?

[feral witchchild]

we are a CONTAMINANT from some place else. this planet ain't home.

What exactly do you base this on?

[Motorway to Roswell]

Everything coexists on earth, except humans, so we could well be alien. However, the cycle of chaos/order is natural. The human race could be the next step back into chaos. When we're burned out and gone the cycle will continue back into order in some shape or form.

Well, that's one way of looking at it anyway.

[parson]

we are a CONTAMINANT from some place else. this planet ain't home.

What exactly do you base this on?

i'm from the future.

[parson]

Everything coexists on earth, except humans, so we could well be alien. However, the cycle of chaos/order is natural. The human race could be the next step back into chaos. When we're burned out and gone the cycle will continue back into order in some shape or form.

Well, that's one way of looking at it anyway.

i've got no problem with the way things are playing out. i just get irritated with how apparently intelligent people are completely incapable of perceiving obvious truths.

[magma]

we are a CONTAMINANT from some place else. this planet ain't home.

So all the other life is terrestrial.... but we're not?

How come several species of hominid, at different stages of evolution exist in the fossil record? I noticed they unearthed another one the other week.

I guess I'm asking what do you think Panspermia transported - the precursors for life, which led to everything on Earth, or just Hominid-life in some slightly-pre-human form?

How come we're so well adapted to life on Earth? Perfect bodies for the gravity levels, perfect respiratory system for the atmosphere, perfect eyes for the level of sunlight, perfect nutrional needs for the available food... if we didn't evolve here, then some comet hit the jackpot when it accidentally brought us here?!

[Genevieve]

EXACTLY like neocons in the 90s saying there's no proof that mankind is killing the planet

I'm actually arguing that 'killing' isn't the correct term to use here and that 'changing' is more in place. Read my second post in this thread to get an idea of the actual point I am making.

now you're trying to say killing the planet isn't bad

I didn't say that. Again, reread my second post.

[parson]

panspermia is the word scientists are using for what they are figuring out is the nature of the galaxy

they're discovering that life is seeded and that fertile planets are like fertile fields, and life is going to pop up there. and due to the nature of the seeding, you're going to find similar life on similar fields.

[parson]

EXACTLY like neocons in the 90s saying there's no proof that mankind is killing the planet

I'm actually arguing that 'killing' isn't the correct term to use here and that 'changing' is more in place. Read my second post in this thread to get an idea of the actual point I am making.

now you're trying to say killing the planet isn't bad

I didn't say that. Again, reread my second post.

i've lost interest in your convoluted justification for complacency. shed some dogma and maybe we'll be able to communicate.

[Motorway to Roswell]

Everything coexists on earth, except humans, so we could well be alien. However, the cycle of chaos/order is natural. The human race could be the next step back into chaos. When we're burned out and gone the cycle will continue back into order in some shape or form.

Well, that's one way of looking at it anyway.

i've got no problem with the way things are playing out. i just get irritated with how apparently intelligent people are completely incapable of perceiving obvious truths.

I don't think humans can know truth.

[parson]

hominid ETs is not the result of limited thinking resulting in anthropomorphization. it is the nature of this galaxy.

[parson]

Everything coexists on earth, except humans, so we could well be alien. However, the cycle of chaos/order is natural. The human race could be the next step back into chaos. When we're burned out and gone the cycle will continue back into order in some shape or form.

Well, that's one way of looking at it anyway.

i've got no problem with the way things are playing out. i just get irritated with how apparently intelligent people are completely incapable of perceiving obvious truths.

I don't think humans can know truth.

look into gnosis further. maybe via rosicrucianism.

[Motorway to Roswell]

Everything coexists on earth, except humans, so we could well be alien. However, the cycle of chaos/order is natural. The human race could be the next step back into chaos. When we're burned out and gone the cycle will continue back into order in some shape or form.

Well, that's one way of looking at it anyway.

i've got no problem with the way things are playing out. i just get irritated with how apparently intelligent people are completely incapable of perceiving obvious truths.

I don't think humans can know truth.

look into gnosis further. maybe via rosicrucianism.

I'll do some reading.

[magma]

panspermia is the word scientists are using for what they are figuring out is the nature of the galaxy

they're discovering that life is seeded and that fertile planets are like fertile fields, and life is going to pop up there. and due to the nature of the seeding, you're going to find similar life on similar fields.

Ok, so at which point do you believe the genetics of the alien life was at when it was seeded on Earth? Obviously, you can't be thinking single-celled or even microscopic organisms if it's only humans that are now the aliens... all sorts would've sprouted, no?

[Genevieve]

panspermia is the word scientists are using for what they are figuring out is the nature of the galaxy

they're discovering that life is seeded and that fertile planets are like fertile fields, and life is going to pop up there. and due to the nature of the seeding, you're going to find similar life on similar fields.

Ehh, 'seeds of life' is a metaphor for the 'chemical compounds needed to build amino-acids' and 'panspermia' is still merely a hypothesis that has yet to be proven or disproven by science.

[parson]

at the end of time, the secrets are all out. we're just in a transitory stage where information gets around faster than people can absorb it.

[Genevieve]

hominid ETs is not the result of limited thinking resulting in anthropomorphization. it is the nature of this galaxy.

Again, provide hard evidence for this?

[parson]

panspermia is the word scientists are using for what they are figuring out is the nature of the galaxy

they're discovering that life is seeded and that fertile planets are like fertile fields, and life is going to pop up there. and due to the nature of the seeding, you're going to find similar life on similar fields.

Ehh, 'seeds of life' is a metaphor for the 'chemical compounds needed to build amino-acids' and 'panspermia' is still merely a hypothesis that has yet to be proven or disproven by science.

pay attention more and repeat consensus thought less and the world will quickly make much more sense.

[parson]

hominid ETs is not the result of limited thinking resulting in anthropomorphization. it is the nature of this galaxy.

Again, provide hard evidence for this?

for the people who give a shit, the evidence is limitless. for the people who don't believe, none of the evidence is conclusive, and is all dismissed without scrutiny.

try looking into the disclosure project. 400+ government/military witnesses are trying to testify before congress.

[parson]

sgt clifford stone said there were 57 humanoid species of ETs catalogged and many of them were so human in appearance that they can blend in with the population unnoticed.

[Genevieve]

I guess this is it, then. You have failed to provide any evidence that backs any of your ideas when politely asked, having resorted to childish namecalling to try to prove the other person wrong for roughly 8 or 9 pages now.

If you can't provide any evidence for your claims beyond 'lol ur dumb' and 'I'm right, you're wrong, open your eyes' then you are in no position to discuss anything. Job well done.