Why is FL studio looked down upon?

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
User avatar
shortinos
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:26 pm

Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by shortinos » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:05 pm

I'm just wondering, being a FL studio user (and Renoise) that when i mention i use FL studio to people, they gotta say something bad about it, or say something like "that's a toy" or whatever. I just don't get it. Now ok, most people that said that don't know anything about music production and were mostly just my mates but still, i feel that FL studio has a bad reputation for some unknown reason.

Is there stuff other DAWs can do that FL studio can't? I don't think so....or not that i've seen. And why do magazines like Computer Music etc rarely talk about FL studio anymore? I remember when they use to back in the early 00's. But now they just rape Albeton and Cubase etc. Fair play though, i respect those DAWs but i don't see why FL studio is being ignored. Maybe it's just elitism, i dont know. It's not really been bothering me, but i was just wondering. I guess it all comes down to personal preference and desired workflow. Other DAWs seem suitable for others.

And also this is my last post last as Shortinos, i will be posting under the name Shekul instead (and will actually have a soundcloud and shizzle cheeeeeeese) :t:

User avatar
Astral
Posts: 788
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:13 pm

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by Astral » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:13 pm

Probably it's original name.
For Production Tips Guides and Files:http://secondrateaudio.blogspot.com

For My Tunes: http://soundcloud.com/astraldubstep/

User avatar
Basic A
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:53 am
Location: Pittsburgh - You might know me as Teknicyde
Contact:

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by Basic A » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:15 pm

Thier all the same and anyone who would say bad about FL is just plain retarded. Does everything and anything... only fault, it doesnt have PDC during monitoring.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Image
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics

User avatar
FSTZ
Posts: 7706
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 am
Location: Cookingham

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by FSTZ » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:23 pm

Astral wrote:Probably it's original name.
yep

User avatar
j_one
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: South East, UK
Contact:

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by j_one » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:31 pm

shortinos wrote:Maybe it's just elitism, i dont know.
Probably this mainly. I think lots of people get a huge ego boost from claiming to use "superior" software and writing you off completely.

Mad love for FL Studio.

User avatar
Astral
Posts: 788
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:13 pm

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by Astral » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:35 pm

You could also argue Delay compensation, but thats getting sorted afaik.
For Production Tips Guides and Files:http://secondrateaudio.blogspot.com

For My Tunes: http://soundcloud.com/astraldubstep/

User avatar
Basic A
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:53 am
Location: Pittsburgh - You might know me as Teknicyde
Contact:

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by Basic A » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:37 pm

Astral wrote:You could also argue Delay compensation, but thats getting sorted afaik.
Yeah but like I said its only on monitor so who gives 2?
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Image
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics

User avatar
FSTZ
Posts: 7706
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 am
Location: Cookingham

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by FSTZ » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:47 pm

I like Sonar..

developed by the same company.. they just gave it a non-laughable name

IMHO, FL is just another vehicle to get you to the same place as all other DAWS take you...

a lot of people make good tunes on FL studio

it's just not for me

User avatar
wayoftheworld
Posts: 966
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: Solitude, United States

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by wayoftheworld » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:51 pm

people start hating and it spreads like the clap. even if the program is great (which FL definetly is) it just becomes a matter of people saying it sucks because it's cool and expected to say it sucks.

that, and the name.
Last edited by wayoftheworld on Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.myspace.com/wizardsdeskfl - drone/doom
http://www.myspace.com/impaledbeyondallreason - grim frost-ensorcelling norsk vengeful satanic misanthropic black metal

User avatar
sifres
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:22 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by sifres » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:53 pm

Sure it can do anything another daw can... It's better at 1 or 2 things even... But some of the functions are stowed away in far places. It's perceived as crap because people tend to not look further.

I just personally think it fucks up my workflow and am glad I made the switch to ableton...
6 afraid of 7 cause 7 8 9

User avatar
Astral
Posts: 788
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:13 pm

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by Astral » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:57 pm

This makes me lol :D

For Production Tips Guides and Files:http://secondrateaudio.blogspot.com

For My Tunes: http://soundcloud.com/astraldubstep/

User avatar
futures_untold
Posts: 4429
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by futures_untold » Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:14 pm

I think the graphics look very cartoony, although that isn't really a bad thing.

Back in the day (when there were fewer software options), most studios either used Pro Tools or Cubase. Fruity Loops did look like a toy compared to PT and Cubase back then.

The same kinds of things are said about Reason, for the same reasons imo.

The graphics don't make any software better than another, but the features do.

Fruity appeared when Pro Tools and Cubase were firmly established as industry standards.

New software like Reaper is still being levelled on feature based arguements like this all the time...

Who cares? Just install the latest version of Reaper today and everything will work out just fine! 8)
Last edited by futures_untold on Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Shekul
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:08 pm
Location: South East, UK

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by Shekul » Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:29 pm

Image

SesG
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: SO14

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by SesG » Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:48 pm

Shekul wrote:Image
If you can back it up say fruity loops without being 'its what i use innit', despite what it would appear colleges dont just want a bunch of guy who toe the line - oxford/cambridge applicants are sometimes taught to make a ridiculous argument and balance it as best they can so they stand out from the crowd.
Image
.............................http://soundcloud.com/ses-1.............................
Image

User avatar
Shekul
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:08 pm
Location: South East, UK

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by Shekul » Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:01 pm

SesG wrote:
Shekul wrote:picture
If you can back it up say fruity loops without being 'its what i use innit', despite what it would appear colleges dont just want a bunch of guy who toe the line - oxford/cambridge applicants are sometimes taught to make a ridiculous argument and balance it as best they can so they stand out from the crowd.
Yeah that's what i would've done, but i'm not actually applying. I was told about it by someone who has previous done the course.

egoless
Posts: 985
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Croatia
Contact:

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by egoless » Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:06 pm

goddamn these FL vs Cubase vs Reason vs Renoise vs Logic vs Reaper vs anything threads...

Work in whatever you feel good and creative...
Lion Charge records, ZamZam sounds

Motorway to Roswell
Posts: 5929
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: In that palace in the sun

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by Motorway to Roswell » Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:06 pm

Because people like to have something to put other people down with or to complain about.
"...we now pause to test the soul of the Steppenwolf"

User avatar
Bledbox
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:26 pm
Location: London / Southampton
Contact:

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by Bledbox » Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:23 pm

People are silly, apparently 'When I Look At You' by Emalkay was made 100% on FL, and that was one of last years massive bangers so fuck what people say. [Don't know if thats true btw, but I've heard it said, but my point still stands :D ]

staticcast
Posts: 908
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:08 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by staticcast » Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:47 pm

Probably also got something to do with the fact that practically no pro studios (as in, live recording studios) use it. I would imagine (though I'm not sure) that its editing capabilities and workflow aren't quite as streamlined as, say, Pro Tools, for intensive audio editing stuff like fixing live drum takes, splicing parts etc, which doesn't really matter if you're making EDM. Also, what are its routing options like? I'm playing devil's advocate here as I've never used FL, but bear in mind that just because it does everything you need it to do, doesn't mean it does everything that someone else might want it to do, as quickly and efficiently as one of the bigger players...

It really doesn't matter anyway though; use whatever makes you feel the most creative.
o b j e k t

egoless
Posts: 985
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Croatia
Contact:

Re: Why is FL studio looked down upon?

Post by egoless » Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:55 pm

static_cast wrote:Probably also got something to do with the fact that practically no pro studios (as in, live recording studios) use it. I would imagine (though I'm not sure) that its editing capabilities and workflow aren't quite as streamlined as, say, Pro Tools, for intensive audio editing stuff like fixing live drum takes, splicing parts etc, which doesn't really matter if you're making EDM. Also, what are its routing options like? I'm playing devil's advocate here as I've never used FL, but bear in mind that just because it does everything you need it to do, doesn't mean it does everything that someone else might want it to do, as quickly and efficiently as one of the bigger players...

It really doesn't matter anyway though; use whatever makes you feel the most creative.
you made good points. Heavy audio editing is not what FL is about. It's very creative tool for creating music, not editing it...
Lion Charge records, ZamZam sounds

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests