sub for ur nub
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
sub for ur nub
Im an oldschool head, therefore i only use FL 5, can anybody help me on making a nice sub, check my myspace, see what you think for the tracks ive done so far. I've got some good ideas, but a subs....all....i....nnnnneeeee---eeeeeeeedddd
Be on the lookout for 808 samples for that rapid pitch drop (gives it more punch). You could try lowpassing a square wave if you're finding the sine a bit nondescript and characterless
Something I did find that seemed to help was when dealing with the sub was that the sub punch generally seems to be heaviest around 50-70hz and fairly wooly below that (you can still feel/hear it to about 20-30hz). If you low shelve at-12db at around 30-40hz and boost a few db between 50-70hz that does seem to make a lot of difference to the physicality of the sub.
Tiny bit of overdrive never hurts either (not too much though)
Something I did find that seemed to help was when dealing with the sub was that the sub punch generally seems to be heaviest around 50-70hz and fairly wooly below that (you can still feel/hear it to about 20-30hz). If you low shelve at-12db at around 30-40hz and boost a few db between 50-70hz that does seem to make a lot of difference to the physicality of the sub.
Tiny bit of overdrive never hurts either (not too much though)
Hmm....


thanks man, what do you think of the sub in the track on my myspace (not the 1 called fresh)Shonky wrote:Be on the lookout for 808 samples for that rapid pitch drop (gives it more punch). You could try lowpassing a square wave if you're finding the sine a bit nondescript and characterless
Something I did find that seemed to help was when dealing with the sub was that the sub punch generally seems to be heaviest around 50-70hz and fairly wooly below that (you can still feel/hear it to about 20-30hz). If you low shelve at-12db at around 30-40hz and boost a few db between 50-70hz that does seem to make a lot of difference to the physicality of the sub.
Tiny bit of overdrive never hurts either (not too much though)
-
narcossist
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:21 pm
good tips on square wave and overdrive, but have u tried that eq tip with a woofer or on a club system? i was under the impression that the physicality comes from all the stuff below about 50hz... i dont have a sub at home or easy access to a big system so i cant try it out.Shonky wrote:Be on the lookout for 808 samples for that rapid pitch drop (gives it more punch). You could try lowpassing a square wave if you're finding the sine a bit nondescript and characterless
Something I did find that seemed to help was when dealing with the sub was that the sub punch generally seems to be heaviest around 50-70hz and fairly wooly below that (you can still feel/hear it to about 20-30hz). If you low shelve at-12db at around 30-40hz and boost a few db between 50-70hz that does seem to make a lot of difference to the physicality of the sub.
Tiny bit of overdrive never hurts either (not too much though)
- blood_on_neon
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:55 am
- Contact:
Shonky you're right on with the eq there. It's worth applying exactly what you said about eq to the actual pitches used too. This chart is super-helpful.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/notes.html
So if you're juggling your bassline between, say, B1 and F1, you're going to feel the punch of the higher pitch and the real rumble of the lower.
Don't low-shelve it above the freq of your lowest note though: it's just going to affect the level/impact of that note. Same goes at the top end.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/notes.html
So if you're juggling your bassline between, say, B1 and F1, you're going to feel the punch of the higher pitch and the real rumble of the lower.
Don't low-shelve it above the freq of your lowest note though: it's just going to affect the level/impact of that note. Same goes at the top end.
Yeah, good advice. Heard someone on (probably) DOA saying that if you work with filter and resonance on the really low notes, if you go through and resample when they hit that particular sweet spot where they really pop out the speaker at ya, and do that for an octave say, and then just load it back in as a multisample you'll have a pretty solid, hard hitting, punchy sub. Had a quick go at it and it seemed to come out pretty goodblood_on_neon wrote:Shonky you're right on with the eq there. It's worth applying exactly what you said about eq to the actual pitches used too. This chart is super-helpful.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/notes.html
So if you're juggling your bassline between, say, B1 and F1, you're going to feel the punch of the higher pitch and the real rumble of the lower.
Don't low-shelve it above the freq of your lowest note though: it's just going to affect the level/impact of that note. Same goes at the top end.
I don't know (or care particularly) how it works, but experiment with it and see what happens.
Hmm....


- blood_on_neon
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:55 am
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests