That's all no ?#1. DON'T BE A DUMBASS
rule #1 can manifest itself in many, many ways. The most common one is DON'T BREAK THE LAW IN PLAIN DAYLIGHT. IE, don't ask/post about cracked software or warez on a public forum, and don't share copyrighted material (most commonly, samples).
#2. New to dubstep? Got a question about production? Welcome to the family. We're more than happy to help, but it's a 2-way street, so do your due diligence: USE THE SEARCH BUTTON and READ THE STICKIES before you ask.
#3. As fellow producers, we want to hear your tunes, tune ideas, synthesis projects, etc. there's 2 threads up top for feedback-- post 'em there, rather than making a new thread.
that's all.
DSF-ADVANCED ?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
A lifted studio forum like ... Why ?
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
Nope, I don't want to get bitched at when I lock all of Serox's postsBasic A wrote:Depone wrote:im still down for the idea of having another 'advanced' sub forum, being read only to members who have not been approved / have low post count / have joined for less then 2 weeks or something.
I don't see it as being elitist at all, but some quality control.
I also think there does need to be another mod to ease the strain on you good few! But maybe one from a regular user (thinking basic a, fstz, whyrez, abz) who can then have the access to lock (but not delete threads) just a lil bit more power to the people![]()
Power scares me.
Give it to Deadly and Whyrez.

-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
wirez wrote:Nope, I don't want to get bitched at when I lock all of Serox's postsBasic A wrote:Depone wrote:im still down for the idea of having another 'advanced' sub forum, being read only to members who have not been approved / have low post count / have joined for less then 2 weeks or something.
I don't see it as being elitist at all, but some quality control.
I also think there does need to be another mod to ease the strain on you good few! But maybe one from a regular user (thinking basic a, fstz, whyrez, abz) who can then have the access to lock (but not delete threads) just a lil bit more power to the people![]()
Power scares me.
Give it to Deadly and Whyrez.

Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
Deadly for president!
EDIT: He is such a moran btw... it's spelled hobbit, not habbit.
EDIT: He is such a moran btw... it's spelled hobbit, not habbit.
paravrais wrote:It genuinely was a couple of years before I realised it was pronounced re-noise not ren-wah
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
I'm down.
Soundcloud
P Daley wrote:Ended up at a party last night with a bunch of people I don't know and blacked out,
Woke up this morning with an email about ordering a $70 pair of UFO pants.
-
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
kejk wrote:Deadly for president!
EDIT: He is such a moran btw... it's spelled hobbit, not habbit.

Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
I̶̘͔͍̝̒͐̆̈̎̄́̚͜ ̴̲͎̂ͣ̂̓̍̓̑̎ȁ͔̫̲̱̹̗͙͍͖̚m̨͔͇͓̬̜̂̑͌̂̍̿́́͐ͅ ̭̲͚̱̮̟̜̘ͦͨ̂n͓̘̳̜͉̦̫̥ͯ̒̈̂͒ͩ̊̎o͙̙̾͂͗͊ͧt̓͂ͮ͝͏̤̫͎͓͖̪̝̰ ͦ̈̒̃҉̩̘̗̳͉̹̦̺̣t̸̻͌͆͋͊ͅͅr̵͔̬̰͙̳̫̋͒͑͌̄̑̍̕͞o̼̰̫̻̳̠̫͊̓̃lͯ̈̋ͯ͆ͩͭ͟͏̙̭̳̪̺̞̝͢l̢̹̭̟̬̦͔̓̑ͯ̓̆ͦͯ̐͠i̢͚̭̺̜͉͓̙ͨ̓̀͛͝ṅ̴̸̜͎̳̪̝͚̟̽g͈͙̱̗͔̥͚͓̮ͬdeadly habit wrote:kejk wrote:Deadly for president!
EDIT: He is such a moran btw... it's spelled hobbit, not habbit.
̷̤̝̲̻̥͇̖̈̊ͧ̀̚͟
͓̫͌
͈̤̤͔̳̠͍̾͗ͧ͝H͎̓̕͞E̱̹̳̯̹̤͒ͥͯ͌̽͌̒̄́ ͬ̋͏̸̶̟͕̥̬C̨͔͚̯̰͖̭̬̄ͮ͂̒̒͘O̔̇̾͛͑̑͗҉̟̗M̠͓̱̞̪̯͚͙̎̆̈͝E̶͈͚̐̀S̛̳̖͎̩͖̼̻ͪ́ͅ
paravrais wrote:It genuinely was a couple of years before I realised it was pronounced re-noise not ren-wah
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
this whole thread is prove of the fact that an "advanced" section is needed
- back2onett
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:47 pm
- Location: Brizzle
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
maybe instead of an advanced section we could just get a beginners section
How does I wobbled bass?
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
I like that idea!back2onett wrote:maybe instead of an advanced section we could just get a beginners section
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
So to sum up:
What's the conclusion of this thread That is the fundamental question that needs answering
What's the conclusion of this thread That is the fundamental question that needs answering
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
Fuck me, possibly the smartest thing I've heard said on this thread!!back2onett wrote:maybe instead of an advanced section we could just get a beginners section
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
LOL i thought you was going to say "fuck off, what a dumb idea"wirez wrote:Fuck me, possibly the smartest thing I've heard said on this thread!!back2onett wrote:maybe instead of an advanced section we could just get a beginners section
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
but would the beginners go to the beginners section then?
And what would you see first, haha
but yes it is a very good idea, and less elitist as well so might be better in that way as well
And what would you see first, haha
but yes it is a very good idea, and less elitist as well so might be better in that way as well
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/forum
just saying
a. The public square or marketplace of an ancient Roman city that was the assembly place for judicial activity and public business.
b. A public meeting place for open discussion.
c. A medium for open discussion or voicing of ideas, such as a newspaper, a radio or television program, or a website.
just saying
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
Yes label it beginners lol, and we will go there to help to them, providing its not how do you make wub wub wub..HALP wrote:but would the beginners go to the beginners section then?
And what would you see first, haha
but yes it is a very good idea, and less elitist as well so might be better in that way as well
- kaiori breathe
- Posts: 1715
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:26 am
- Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
- Contact:
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
I haven't really said much on this thread. But here's my 2 cents:
No matter what forum I've been on, be it a guitar forum, a dubstep forum or a drum and bass forum, they have all had the exact same problem. People whining about a certain type of thread. In Guitar forums it was people whining about n00bs posting shit like "how do I sound like Kirk Hammet" in the Drum and bass forums it was people whining about threads asking how to make Reese basses and here it's wobbles.
The problem is universal and won't be solved. You can moderate as hard as you like and create as many sub forums as possible and you'll still never stop all the stupid threads. You can sticky things, but some people will just never read them, and you can try as you might to work out some kind of elaborate system of prevention when it comes to these threads, but the truth is there is no escaping them.
If you set up a beginners thread you're going to have an even bigger problem, because while everyone likes to imagine they'd pop by and try to help, the truth is deep down most of us know we just won't when it comes down to it at the end of the day. We'll try once or twice a week to go in and give some advice, and then it'll dwindle to once a month, then to once every two months, then we'll forget the beginner forum even exists. When it comes to crunch time people never do what they said they will. So you'll end up with a beginners forum where they don't get enough help, get disillusioned and leave. Which ultimately is even worse for the forum. Even if you did manage to separate the n00b from the elite you'd still have a problem where every now and then a total idiot would get through to the higher level sub forum and ask something retarded. So the problem still isn't solved.
If you split it the other way and create an advanced forum you've got the same problem, just under a different guise. The best solution is to stop getting so upset by wobble threads and the likes.
Every forum/online community I've ever been a part of has the same problem as DSF does. It's not a sign the forum is dying or getting worse (as it's often declared to be). It's a completely natural part of an online community. /b/ has been complaining that 'newfags' are ruining it since day one, Ultimate-guitar.com has been complaining that all 'the cool old-cigarettes left because it was too strict' and that 'there are too many penis threads' (although that's kinda to be expected on a forum about guitar), doa is still complaining about 'reese threads' and dsf will always complain about wobble threads.
There is no solution to this problem. If you even consider it a problem. To me it's just a natural state of being for any forum that is fairly impossible to combat effectively with any resource other than a degree of patience and friendliness towards the offending group.
/\ Just my thoughts on the issue. You're all welcome to disagree with me.
No matter what forum I've been on, be it a guitar forum, a dubstep forum or a drum and bass forum, they have all had the exact same problem. People whining about a certain type of thread. In Guitar forums it was people whining about n00bs posting shit like "how do I sound like Kirk Hammet" in the Drum and bass forums it was people whining about threads asking how to make Reese basses and here it's wobbles.
The problem is universal and won't be solved. You can moderate as hard as you like and create as many sub forums as possible and you'll still never stop all the stupid threads. You can sticky things, but some people will just never read them, and you can try as you might to work out some kind of elaborate system of prevention when it comes to these threads, but the truth is there is no escaping them.
If you set up a beginners thread you're going to have an even bigger problem, because while everyone likes to imagine they'd pop by and try to help, the truth is deep down most of us know we just won't when it comes down to it at the end of the day. We'll try once or twice a week to go in and give some advice, and then it'll dwindle to once a month, then to once every two months, then we'll forget the beginner forum even exists. When it comes to crunch time people never do what they said they will. So you'll end up with a beginners forum where they don't get enough help, get disillusioned and leave. Which ultimately is even worse for the forum. Even if you did manage to separate the n00b from the elite you'd still have a problem where every now and then a total idiot would get through to the higher level sub forum and ask something retarded. So the problem still isn't solved.
If you split it the other way and create an advanced forum you've got the same problem, just under a different guise. The best solution is to stop getting so upset by wobble threads and the likes.
Every forum/online community I've ever been a part of has the same problem as DSF does. It's not a sign the forum is dying or getting worse (as it's often declared to be). It's a completely natural part of an online community. /b/ has been complaining that 'newfags' are ruining it since day one, Ultimate-guitar.com has been complaining that all 'the cool old-cigarettes left because it was too strict' and that 'there are too many penis threads' (although that's kinda to be expected on a forum about guitar), doa is still complaining about 'reese threads' and dsf will always complain about wobble threads.
There is no solution to this problem. If you even consider it a problem. To me it's just a natural state of being for any forum that is fairly impossible to combat effectively with any resource other than a degree of patience and friendliness towards the offending group.
/\ Just my thoughts on the issue. You're all welcome to disagree with me.
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
I just thought I should get a post here to stick up for all the lurkers.
For everybody posting noobish threads that get in the way, there are probably two or three people who just lurk and learn about stuff.
Any steps taken against the lurkers would be bad for everyone involved I think, because you never know when a lurker might actually have something important to say.
For everybody posting noobish threads that get in the way, there are probably two or three people who just lurk and learn about stuff.
Any steps taken against the lurkers would be bad for everyone involved I think, because you never know when a lurker might actually have something important to say.
- kaiori breathe
- Posts: 1715
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:26 am
- Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
- Contact:
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
+1 I lurked for weeks anonymously when I started on this before I made a post.ÆIUM wrote:I just thought I should get a post here to stick up for all the lurkers.
For everybody posting noobish threads that get in the way, there are probably two or three people who just lurk and learn about stuff.
Any steps taken against the lurkers would be bad for everyone involved I think, because you never know when a lurker might actually have something important to say.
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:08 pm
- Location: Berlin
Re: DSF-ADVANCED ?
Uh, maybe it's just me, but I don't actually feel like I'm subjected to all that many threads that are actually about making wobble basses?
o b j e k t
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests