First human 'infected with computer virus'

[alphacat]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10158517.stm

[video also available at link]

A British scientist says he is the first man in the world to become infected with a computer virus.

Dr Mark Gasson from the University of Reading had a chip inserted in his hand which was then infected with a virus.

The device, which enables him to pass through security doors and activate his mobile phone, is a sophisticated version of ID chips used to tag pets.

In trials, Dr Gasson showed that the chip was able to pass on the computer virus to external control systems.

If other implanted chips had then connected to the system they too would have been corrupted, he said.
Medical alert

Dr Gasson admits that the test is a proof of principle but he thinks it has important implications for a future where medical devices such as pacemakers and cochlear implants become more sophisticated, and risk being contaminated by other human implants.

"With the benefits of this type of technology come risks. We may improve ourselves in some way but much like the improvements with other technologies, mobile phones for example, they become vulnerable to risks, such as security problems and computer viruses."

He also added: "Many people with medical implants also consider them to be integrated into their concept of their body, and so in this context it is appropriate to talk in terms of people themselves being infected by computer viruses."

However, Dr Gasson predicts that wider use will be made of implanted technology.

"This type of technology has been commercialised in the United States as a type of medical alert bracelet, so that if you're found unconscious you can be scanned and your medical history brought up."

Professor Rafael Capurro of the Steinbeis-Transfer-Institute of Information Ethics in Germany told BBC News that the research was "interesting".

"If someone can get online access to your implant, it could be serious," he said.
Cosmetic surgery

Professor Capurro contributed to a 2005 ethical study for the European Commission that looked at the development of digital implants and possible abuse of them.

"From an ethical point of view, the surveillance of implants can be both positive and negative," he said.

"Surveillance can be part of medical care, but if someone wants to do harm to you, it could be a problem."

In addition, he said, that there should be caution if implants with surveillance capabilities started to be used outside of a medical setting.

However, Dr Gasson believes that there will be a demand for these non-essential applications, much as people pay for cosmetic surgery.

"If we can find a way of enhancing someone's memory or their IQ then there's a real possibility that people will choose to have this kind of invasive procedure."

Dr Gasson works at the University of Reading's School of Systems Engineering and will present the results of his research at the International Symposium for Technology and Society in Australia next month. Professor Capurro will also talk at the event.

[frank grimes jr.]

Holding old folks at ransom with the IP address of their pacemaker and shit.

[alphacat]

Holding old folks at ransom with the IP address of their pacemaker and shit.

NOW you're talkin'! Hold on while I go get a Pringles can, we'll go wardriving around the old folks' homes...

[helix]

Whoooa

[deadly_habit]

Holding old folks at ransom with the IP address of their pacemaker and shit.

was the first thing i thought when i saw the thread title

[x-kaylie]

mindblown

[parson]

when i first heard about this dude i thought he had to be a huge dickhead, but now i think he's a genius. it's like when tom cruise showed precrime had flaws.

[frank grimes jr.]

So... bionic implants, and the implications on human rights?

[notez_]

we better start buying up a few shares in the anti-virus market.

[alien pimp]

we better start buying up a few shares in the anti-virus market.

sharp!

i'll be more amused when computers die of swine flu

[dreamizm]

also see: The Matrix.

[frank grimes jr.]

we better start buying up a few shares in the anti-virus market.

If you can't trust Facebook with your data, you certainly won't be able to trust Symantec with your DNA.

Open source will be the only answer for both OS and virus/malware/adware protection of bionic components IMO.

I worry about employment security and other human's resentment to my enhancements.
If I can do a job better because I've got an implant, colleagues and rival companies could get very upset over something of that nature.

Along that same vein would be professional athletes.

[notez_]

we better start buying up a few shares in the anti-virus market.

If you can't trust Facebook with your data, you certainly won't be able to trust Symantec with your DNA.

Open source will be the only answer for both OS and virus/malware/adware protection of bionic components IMO.

I worry about employment security and other human's resentment to my enhancements.
If I can do a job better because I've got an implant, colleagues and rival companies could get very upset over something of that nature.

Along that same vein would be professional athletes.

deep

[frank grimes jr.]