hackman wrote:if you betray the organisation you'll be killed, maybe your family will be killed
that's what svali says (incidentally she has gone missing since all her testimony, which you probablyhaven't even heard of

)
surely that's incentive enough?
plus humans are just greedy when you dangle endless money in front of them
Greedy maybe. Infallible, no.
hackman wrote:
not sure where your looking but i've seen fuck loads of whistleblower testimony, leaks, and slip ups
and depends on how much proof you need for it to be true
the truth makes sense
I am talking about legitimate and verifable sources that have been corroborated with evidence that stands up to public scrutiny.
The amount of proof you need for something to be true is usually enough to be 'convincing'. Obviously some people are more easily convinced than others. Personally, I want more 'proof' than a few assumptions and post-theory evidence collation
hackman wrote:
why would the director be brainwashed? this just shows how misinformed you are
I was being sarcastic, implying that the only explanation you could give me for any of these people was that they were 'brainwashed' to keep their mouths shut.
Which brings us back to my original question: Are you honestly and reasonably telling me
the only thing keeping all these ppl from exposing the conspiracy is money?
So have they ALL been paid off? Where does this money come from and would there not be evidence of it being transferred for people like yourselves willing to investigate??