alien pimp wrote:
cuz why do people easily accept threats like osama and not like obama?
because they seem to understand the first without bothering much about it and it appears they have no reason to feel guilty about it
few have the balls to think about the risks of being wrong.
all about sleeping well while being raped
Because Osama is a terrorist and Obama is a President.
I know you'll say "that's what they want you to think" because that's more likely what you believe due to a self doctrination of biased and unreliable evidence.
I'm happy to look at all sides of all arguments, I used to subscribe to alot of the stuff conspiracy theorists say, first time I watched Zeitgeist I actually believed it etc etc, it's so easy to fall into their traps that's exactly what they're intended to do, to make you part of their cult and BUY their books, and give their websites hits (revenue) and spread the 'truth' so more people do so, and then they tell their friends, it's all friendly eh, not for profit of course. Once you've started believing some of these things it's so easy to just buy into others without even questioning them. You have to be careful.
The video shows no REAL evidence, even the website they link to doesn't exist let alone the papers they mention, you just end up in a horrible loop hole through conspiracy websites all going on about how bad it is, but no one actually questioning the claimants evidence!
You have to understand that I couldn't give a shit if Obama was part of some grand conspiracy or not, I really couldn't care less. So if someone shows me that he is, with good verifiable evidence to back up the claim, then I'd happily buy it!
Your quote "all about sleeping well while being raped", I'm guessing you're implying that I'm being raped by 'the system' because I don't know 'the truth'. But think about that for a second. If anyone is losing out it's the conspiracy theorists! They're wasting their precious lives rolling around in these ridiculous made up stories and forcing them on to other people (as all conspiracy theorists do) in an attempt to get them in on the 'truth', it's like a virus, a stupid meme made to waste people's time and money. It's like a cult, it's no better than scientology. It's disgusting.
However saying that, conspiracy theorists are very interesting people, the psychology behind it is really interesting. Doesn't matter though, I guess all the papers and articles written about it were made by 'the system' anyway.
alien pimp wrote:
why "to allow the city to have a different procedure for assigning social security numbers than the rest of New York State"?
I don't know read it! I'm sure there's a reason, maybe it's because there'd be a hell of a lot more people in New York City than New York State. I don't know the reasons behind the US's Social Security Policies. I don't really need to!
alien pimp wrote:
why UN not being mentioned equals UN not being involved?
Well it doesn't mention the UN so why would they be involved? It has nothing to do with the UN, the only people claiming it does are the makers of this video and their sheep, the burden of evidence for that is on them! They've claimed something so they have to prove it. I really don't know why they said it to create the agenda they require I'd imagine.
I'm not a lawyer and I don't know anything about law, but this document is about social security numbers and how they are created by the looks of it.
To clarify; this is the original:
Birth registration document. SSA may enter into an agreement with officials of a State, including, for this purpose, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and New York City, to establish, as part of the official birth registration process, a procedure to assist SSA in assigning social security numbers to newborn children. Where an agreement is in effect, a parent, as part of the official birth registration process, need not complete a form SS-5 and may request that SSA assign a social security number to the newborn child.
and this is what the video claims it says (and they 'quoted' it; atleast that's what their 'citation' says).
New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct.
Pretty different. The only mutual information there is the words 'New York City'.
, maybe it's because there'd be a hell of a lot more people in New York City than New York State. I don't know the reasons behind the US's Social Security Policies. I don't really need to!
