Let's talk snares

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
amphibian
Posts: 1421
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:52 am

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by amphibian » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:35 pm

On a lot of my own tracks, I generally end up layering 2-3 or more Snares, depending on where they hit on the frequency range and just how much snap I'm looking for. Generally I do the following (but not always in the same order):

1. Find a low snare that sits well, has very little high frequency data
2. Find a mid snare that hits around the 500hz mark. This is where a lot of the "thump" comes from
3. Find a clap or a very high snare (usually with frequency data well above 3khz)
4. EQ each of the snares individually so that the low is low-passed, the mid is band-passed and the high... you get the point
5. Add a very tiny amount of distortion - more dry than wet
6. Limit/compress
7. Bounce down and reimport
8. Add reverb

However, I've also got 2 tracks where the single sample was enough and I just eq'd it a little and added some reverb. It really depends on the sound you're after.

I also tend to play with the volumes of each individual snare depending on what kind of groove I'm going for. In deeper tracks, with rim shots or claps, they're generally a bit louder than the rest of the snare samples.
Latest Track
Digital Pilgrimz - Shogun (pHybian remix) - FORTHCOMING FUTURE FOLLOWERS
Soundcloud

Deep. Dark.

In The Shadows
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:19 pm
Location: Croydon

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by In The Shadows » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:59 pm

Wrigzilla wrote:Ok wikum here some things you can do to combat phase cancellation.

- Make sure that the snare samples are starting at the same time (ie line up the transients exactly, if you take a look at the waveforms of some random snare samples you'll notice that they don't all start at the same time).

- Invert the phase of one of them

- Make sure all the snares you're using are tuned to the same note (so say you're using two snares one with a huge peak at 200hz and the other at 180hz, this could end up with phase cancellation).


As for how to check it, use your ears: if the combined sound is weaker than the individual sounds then chances are phase cancellation is at play; is the snare sounds smeared or messy then again it could be phase cancellation. Try loading up two instances of the same snare in seperate tracks and move one subtly out of time with the other, that's what phasing sound like.

As a side note lowering the volume of one snare will not eliminate cancellation (with the classic two sines exapmle, if you change the volume of one then you'll start to hear stuff again, but there's still cancellation going on). I could get really technical and mathsy about this but noone wants to hear that.
agreed, good post.

it happens when youve got a sound that is moving up from the center and one thats moving down from the center at the same time, its like asking a speaker cone to move backwards AND forwards at the same time, it cant do it, the result of the 2 together is that it sits still in the middle.

Like Wrigzilla I think is getting at, having them peak at different values might not be ideal. When Im layering stuff I look to match the spikes of both sounds, it helps them gel together so they dont sound like 2 distinctly different sounds playing at the same time. You might then hammer one with an eq so that it no longer has a spike there, but id try getting them tuned together to start and see how that works out. You could end up with a completely phased out little puff of noise, if that happens then as people have said, invert one of the snares and it should suddenly be hammering out as they exagerate eachothers oscilations rather than hinder them.

DJ Crackle
Posts: 650
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:54 am
Contact:

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by DJ Crackle » Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:07 am

Project EX wrote:
jaydot wrote:A snare in my book should be fat and reverbed
really depends on the type of tune imo
Agreed. I've been working on a tune with a real hip-hop feel recently, and my snares are a lot calmer than usual.

User avatar
Wikum
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:43 am

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by Wikum » Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:39 am

thanks for the tips on the phase issue guys...and more importantly, the tuning part. up until recently i did all my beats in audio tracks. i didn't tune them because the pitch correction plugin i've got doesn't sound very good. also, i always used to get mixed/shitty/buggy results with logic's built in time and pitch machine.


so from now on i'll try doing it the way you guys mention and use stylus rmx or kontakt for my drums.

one thing though..can someone recommend me a good pitch correction plugin (AU not VST) that's simple and sounds like it should? i know there are lots of them, just the ones i've tried all sound shit imo. i still would like to work with audio files if i could. i just find it more fun. i've actually been meaning to ask the forum this question for a while.

jaydot
Posts: 5860
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:34 am
Location: Your place or hers?

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by jaydot » Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:49 am

Soundcloud

This imo is the best snare I've had on my tracks possibly, and all it took from the original sample was maybe some snare reverb and EQing. So I agree with the people that say you've got to have the right sample to start with; like I think it's Skream says in that interview-there's only so much processing you can do.
Soundcloud

Soundcloud

tweet @jaydotdubstep

User avatar
Depone
Posts: 3526
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: South-West UK
Contact:

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by Depone » Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:06 pm

jaydot wrote:Soundcloud

This imo is the best snare I've had on my tracks possibly, and all it took from the original sample was maybe some snare reverb and EQing. So I agree with the people that say you've got to have the right sample to start with; like I think it's Skream says in that interview-there's only so much processing you can do.
sorry to say, but to me the snare sounds quite weak. Its got a lot of hiss like a 909 or 808 snare. But not much bottom end. I actually find disco snares the best as they have a nice peak at around 170hz for some bottom end.
Failing that I will also layer a kick, tuned to the same fundamental frequency of the lowest snare.

User avatar
WAR TORN
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: Southampton, Uk
Contact:

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by WAR TORN » Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:17 pm

JemGrover wrote:RIm shots > Harsh white noise snares anyday

:z:

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by hasezwei » Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:04 pm

WAR TORN wrote:
JemGrover wrote:RIm shots > Harsh white noise snares anyday

:z:
this, and if you want to have something heavy go for ringy snares like "BANG", like donny or current value. their snares are obscene.

User avatar
kaiori breathe
Posts: 1715
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:26 am
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by kaiori breathe » Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:47 pm

jaydot wrote:A lot of (even major producers) snares these days seem lazily processed. A snare in my book should be fat and reverbed and sound a little different to the others, even if you use a clap. If you listen to a lot of snares from major producers and amateurs alike you'll find that they do sound the same and a lot of the time are too weak. What makes a unique snare? How would I go about getting a nice fat sound apart from reverb, compression, EQ and layering and more importantly (newb question slightly) is layering a snare just a case of putting two or three of the same (or differerent) snares on top of each other? How do you make yours?
Well first time I paid as much attention to detail I should have been doing with regards to my drum kits was that tune I did 'tell me you love me'. If I remember right the snare in that is a basketball being smacked off the ground, an idea I stole from mistabishi, with a snare and some white noise, I added a little bit of reverb to help everything mash together a little better then resampled then added distortion and worked on EQing it. I spent about an hour getting that snare right. It went through a preposterous ammount of processing. I probs could have got the same sound just using the old amen snare, but I think mine has more punch and I was aiming for a slightly tamer Current Value-esque sound. I paid ridiculous attention to detail on that thing, when I added reverb and delay at the end I was literally changing each and re-changing each by a matter of miliseconds to get it right. I've been using similar methods since then and I think it's giving me good results. Or at least, the drum kits I'm using suit me more than they did previously. They're more personalised.

And yea, rim shots > white noise. Sick of hearing too much white noise in people's snares which are crushed into the background of tracks and have no punch. I think white noise is something to be used very sparingly.

In summary: It's worth spending time on each individual part of your drum kit, if nothing else, it adds a degree of personalization to your tune.

In The Shadows
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:19 pm
Location: Croydon

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by In The Shadows » Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:17 pm

kaiori breathe wrote:And yea, rim shots > white noise. Sick of hearing too much white noise in people's snares which are crushed into the background of tracks and have no punch. I think white noise is something to be used very sparingly.
I agree, a little blast of white noise can give a nice sting to a snare but I hear it used on its own way too much in cheap sounding dubstep. I think one thing thats essential with them that doesnt happen as much as it should is actually shaping the hit so that is has an attack like a snare, so it has some snap too it rather than this little sheet of hiss that has no real punch. Layering those white noise style hits with real snares and shaping them with a volume envelope so they merge together can have some good results though, gives that extra bit of presence to snare in the high end. Im a big fan of eq boosting for snares to bring out the high end and the punch myself, Its very rare that Id use an eq boost on a melodic instrument but on drum hits I think it works well.

User avatar
narrator
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by narrator » Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:22 pm

would you guys high pass your snares much? i find i'd cut about 100-135Hz off the low myself..

User avatar
kaiori breathe
Posts: 1715
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:26 am
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by kaiori breathe » Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:04 pm

narrator wrote:would you guys high pass your snares much? i find i'd cut about 100-135Hz off the low myself..
I cut a little lower, usually around 80, i usually end up giving a little bump to the 100-130ish range.

User avatar
narcissus
Posts: 1654
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 5:28 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by narcissus » Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:29 pm

kaiori breathe wrote:
In summary: It's worth spending time on each individual part of your drum kit, if nothing else, it adds a degree of personalization to your tune.
:z: couldn't agree more

i'd take it a step further and say it's worth spending lots of time on each invidual bit of your track.. in this way your personality will come across much better, which is what people really listen for in tunes (i feel)

also i would say above all else
don't use the same snares on every damn track... what started as a fresh sound will get tired quick

aftee
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:43 am

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by aftee » Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:45 pm

layering..compression..reverb..fast delay..distortion..EQ..

That's about all I ever add onto a snare and just play with it till it sounds how I want. Sometimes I'll layer weird percussion/FX sounds on top if it adds to it nicely. All about playing around really.. I've made snares out of hats before.
gravious wrote:The only reason they are called that is because Mala and Coki used to do a finger-puppet magic show.

However, the pressing plant on their first release misspelt Mystikal Digitz
One third of A.I. (Aftee + I&I Productions)
http://www.facebook.com/aftee
http://www.soundcloud.com/aftee

User avatar
Wabberjocky
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by Wabberjocky » Sat Sep 18, 2010 1:10 am

layering snares, overrated or necessary?

User avatar
Basic A
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:53 am
Location: Pittsburgh - You might know me as Teknicyde
Contact:

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by Basic A » Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:46 am

Project EX wrote:
jaydot wrote:A snare in my book should be fat and reverbed
really depends on the type of tune imo, ambient oriented stuff won't need a in yo face snare etc.
:roll:

Define ambient maybe...

but this is not always true I promise.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Image
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics

User avatar
symmetricalsounds
Posts: 2200
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:05 pm
Location: uk

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by symmetricalsounds » Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:59 am

Wabberjocky wrote:layering snares, overrated or necessary?
overrated

User avatar
Basic A
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:53 am
Location: Pittsburgh - You might know me as Teknicyde
Contact:

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by Basic A » Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:15 am

narrator wrote:would you guys high pass your snares much? i find i'd cut about 100-135Hz off the low myself..
I usually set the reverb up on a send, then bus it and the original together, so I can eq my verb's seperate (yeah jfk you turned me onto this with his soundcloud comments :lol: ) then I roll off about the bottom 100-125 for good luck on the bus.

Worth noting : this is also nice becuase as long as you dont put any transient shape/comp/limit on that original+reverb bus, you can send small amounts of claps/rims/clicky hihats/woodblocks/ect/ect. too the reverb as a bit of glue. Prolly not great practice. But.... ears.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Image
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics

User avatar
amphibian
Posts: 1421
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:52 am

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by amphibian » Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:37 pm

symmetricalsounds wrote:
Wabberjocky wrote:layering snares, overrated or necessary?
overrated
Disagree. Depends on the track.
Latest Track
Digital Pilgrimz - Shogun (pHybian remix) - FORTHCOMING FUTURE FOLLOWERS
Soundcloud

Deep. Dark.

User avatar
symmetricalsounds
Posts: 2200
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:05 pm
Location: uk

Re: Let's talk snares

Post by symmetricalsounds » Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:59 pm

amphibian wrote:
symmetricalsounds wrote:
Wabberjocky wrote:layering snares, overrated or necessary?
overrated
Disagree. Depends on the track.
i'm not saying layered snares isn't right sometimes, but as a technique i think it's definitely overrated and i would rather spend the time to find one sample that kills it than trying to put together a few.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests