This, which is why I posted the vid in jest, he's a benchmark artist by which a standard is set, if an artist that comes after can't meet the standard, then what is his or her relevance other than the 'next hype'. If the latest so called shit hot guitarist can't match Jimi Hendrix in style or forward thinking then Jimi Hendrix is more relevant.Jean-Luc Cougar wrote:I think it's ABSOLUTELY worth mentioning:paravrais wrote:
Despite the fact he hasn't made anything worth listening to in years?? I didn't mean the music was any less good. Just that the artists aren't making anything new at the moment. It's like if someone started a thread saying how good jimi hendrix was...it's like, we know, everyone knows, but there's nothing new to hear about it so why mention it??
1. Is Miles Davis or John Coltrane any any less relevant to the importance of jazz? Despite Toasty not making dubstep are his tunes any less influential?
2. I would venture to guess that 90% of dubstep fans who have gotten into dubstep in the last year have never heard of Toasty - by mentioning him, it offers them an opportunity to look into who else is out there besides Bar 9, Datsik, Excision, Mt. Eden, etc.
3. If you had a friend who played guitar and was really into rock music - but didn't know who Hendrix was, what he sounded like, or why he was important, wouldn't that make you facepalm?
BAR 9's older shit...
					Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
	By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- 
				Pedro Sánchez
 - Posts: 7727
 - Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
 - Location: ButtonMoon
 
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
those tunes have nothing on this
SO FULTHY
NEW MT EDEN
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
You need to remove the word "older" from the title
			
			
									
									jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
Soundcloud.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/
- Jean-Luc Cougar
 - Posts: 68
 - Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:43 pm
 
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
ThisDZA wrote:You need to remove the word "older" from the title
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
Two things, firstly, Hendrix is blues. Secondly, I don't think that would ever happen lol.Jean-Luc Cougar wrote:I think it's ABSOLUTELY worth mentioning:paravrais wrote:
Despite the fact he hasn't made anything worth listening to in years?? I didn't mean the music was any less good. Just that the artists aren't making anything new at the moment. It's like if someone started a thread saying how good jimi hendrix was...it's like, we know, everyone knows, but there's nothing new to hear about it so why mention it??
1. Is Miles Davis or John Coltrane any any less relevant to the importance of jazz? Despite Toasty not making dubstep are his tunes any less influential?
2. I would venture to guess that 90% of dubstep fans who have gotten into dubstep in the last year have never heard of Toasty - by mentioning him, it offers them an opportunity to look into who else is out there besides Bar 9, Datsik, Excision, Mt. Eden, etc.
3. If you had a friend who played guitar and was really into rock music - but didn't know who Hendrix was, what he sounded like, or why he was important, wouldn't that make you facepalm?
I think people are getting a bit too worked up here and missing my point. Sure if someone comes to you and says they are just getting into dubstep can you recommend them some tunes then point them in the direction of toasty or bar9 or whoever the hell you want.
ALL I'm saying is that I don't think it's necessary to create new threads in the production forum to post youtube videos of old bar9 and toasty tracks when anyone browsing on here is gonna know about them already. I mean the recent Eskmo thread was relevant because the album has JUST come out and is very forward thinking from a musical and technicaly perspective. But there's no reason to spam the forum up with threads about just any old tunes that you like. If I made a thread saying "Woa I just realised how good ruskos old stuff is, check out this song called 'cockney thug'" people would tear me apart lol
- Jean-Luc Cougar
 - Posts: 68
 - Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:43 pm
 
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
Yeah dude...paravrais wrote: Two things, firstly, Hendrix is blues. Secondly, I don't think that would ever happen lol.
Just blues, definitely not considered rock...yeah, right - stop trying to intellectualize something that doesn't need it.
PS: On a scale of Blind Willie Johnson to Aerosmith, Jimi is more rock than blues. No denying Hendrix, Stones, Zeppelin, Cream, etc were blues influenced, but they took the influence and fused it with rock and roll to become the archetype of what the general public considers rock.
Back on topic: I would bet that 25-50% people on the forum don't know who Toasty is - wanna make a poll?
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
Yeah Hendrix defo rock. But yeah I think people have heard of Toasty but I am shocked at how many people never really sat down and listened. I personally know people real into dubstep that don't even give a shit about the pioneers of dubstep and will openly admit that. Just about the only genre out there that these type of people aren't mocked. Hiphop is like that too I guess. I know a lot of kids coming up that don't know about thier 70s and 80s hiphop. I dunno to each their own. I am a dj tho I make it my businesss to know my history all the way back to folk and blues.
			
			
									
									
						Re: BAR 9's older shit...
Hendrix was blues through and through 100%. Dylan didn't stop being blues when he went electric now did he (he may have stopped being good but that's another matter) Stones were rock and roll but Zeppelin were early metal and Cream are some sort of guitar based easy listening band aren't they?Jean-Luc Cougar wrote:PS: On a scale of Blind Willie Johnson to Aerosmith, Jimi is more rock than blues. No denying Hendrix, Stones, Zeppelin, Cream, etc were blues influenced, but they took the influence and fused it with rock and roll to become the archetype of what the general public considers rock.
It makes me sad when people think anything with an electric guitar is rock music :\ if anybody says the black keys are rock I'm gonna roll up to their house in my boxers and bitch slap them with my shlong.
That's not on topic at all, this thread was actually about Bar9s old music XDJean-Luc Cougar wrote:Back on topic: I would bet that 25-50% people on the forum don't know who Toasty is - wanna make a poll?
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
Dylan was folk not blues. Do you even know what blues is?paravrais wrote:Hendrix was blues through and through 100%. Dylan didn't stop being blues when he went electric now did he (he may have stopped being good but that's another matter) Stones were rock and roll but Zeppelin were early metal and Cream are some sort of guitar based easy listening band aren't they?Jean-Luc Cougar wrote:PS: On a scale of Blind Willie Johnson to Aerosmith, Jimi is more rock than blues. No denying Hendrix, Stones, Zeppelin, Cream, etc were blues influenced, but they took the influence and fused it with rock and roll to become the archetype of what the general public considers rock.
It makes me sad when people think anything with an electric guitar is rock music :\ if anybody says the black keys are rock I'm gonna roll up to their house in my boxers and bitch slap them with my shlong.
That's not on topic at all, this thread was actually about Bar9s old music XDJean-Luc Cougar wrote:Back on topic: I would bet that 25-50% people on the forum don't know who Toasty is - wanna make a poll?
- Bloodstream
 - Posts: 2396
 - Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:50 pm
 - Location: Arabia
 
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
is anyone going to this event too  
 

will record Bar9
			
			
									
									
						
will record Bar9
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
This. What are you on about Para?abZ wrote:
Dylan was folk not blues. Do you even know what blues is?
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
Nah mate. Hendrix started with blues as a backing guitarist in many different blues groups... 
and progressed to be the fore-father of rock. Hes not as you put it 100% blues, he did take his bluesy styles into his work. but i think your being anal when hes clearly rock.
			
			
									
									
						and progressed to be the fore-father of rock. Hes not as you put it 100% blues, he did take his bluesy styles into his work. but i think your being anal when hes clearly rock.
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
I didnt know about that toasty track.paravrais wrote:But there's no reason to spam the forum up with threads about just any old tunes that you like.
Im glad i do now.
Thank you.
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
My bad, I actually meant to write folk, my brain got muddled cos we were talking about Hendrix lol. (to be fair dylan does have some bluesy influences tooJFK wrote:This. What are you on about Para?abZ wrote:
Dylan was folk not blues. Do you even know what blues is?
I can kinda see what people mean here, I guess Hendrix did evolve into a kind of psychedelic-blues-rock. I just meant that really at it's core it's mostly blues. It's all based on blues scales and the general 'feel' of blues is so prominent in his tracks. Had a think about it and decided I'm probably being hypocritical here as I always tell people off for calling Burial dubstep when IMO he clearly makes predominantly garage with heavy dubstep influences but it's still garage. I guess Jimi was playing rock with heavy blues influences. I just always associate the word rock with like the rolling stones and elvis etc which are miles away from Hendrix. Feels wrong to associate Hendrix with rock music, psychedelic and blues fit him so much more.
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
abZ wrote:Dylan was folk not blues. Do you even know what blues is?paravrais wrote:Hendrix was blues through and through 100%. Dylan didn't stop being blues when he went electric now did he (he may have stopped being good but that's another matter) Stones were rock and roll but Zeppelin were early metal and Cream are some sort of guitar based easy listening band aren't they?Jean-Luc Cougar wrote:PS: On a scale of Blind Willie Johnson to Aerosmith, Jimi is more rock than blues. No denying Hendrix, Stones, Zeppelin, Cream, etc were blues influenced, but they took the influence and fused it with rock and roll to become the archetype of what the general public considers rock.
It makes me sad when people think anything with an electric guitar is rock music :\ if anybody says the black keys are rock I'm gonna roll up to their house in my boxers and bitch slap them with my shlong.
That's not on topic at all, this thread was actually about Bar9s old music XDJean-Luc Cougar wrote:Back on topic: I would bet that 25-50% people on the forum don't know who Toasty is - wanna make a poll?
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
Hendrix definitely played the blues, no doubt.  Also no doubt he was a rock artist.  And as far as how he started, it was by backing up R&B acts.  If u wanna label something 100% blues, try John Lee hooker, BB King, or something off Mingus' "Blues and Roots" album…  
As far as Dylan goes, he was playing country/folk on acoustic, and with the band, he played rock and roll. Always considered himself a rocker. He started on electric in rock n roll garage bands with his friends.
The song "meet me in the morning" off Blood On The Tracks -- a blues, through and through.
See, the words are kind of restrictive.
			
			
									
									As far as Dylan goes, he was playing country/folk on acoustic, and with the band, he played rock and roll. Always considered himself a rocker. He started on electric in rock n roll garage bands with his friends.
The song "meet me in the morning" off Blood On The Tracks -- a blues, through and through.
See, the words are kind of restrictive.
Soundcloud 
SOME SONGS AND TUNES :|
						SOME SONGS AND TUNES :|
- Jean-Luc Cougar
 - Posts: 68
 - Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:43 pm
 
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
And by your definition the Rolling Stones, and Led Zeppelin would be blues as well, their usage of blues scales, chord changes, etc and even covering blues songs.paravrais wrote:
I can kinda see what people mean here, I guess Hendrix did evolve into a kind of psychedelic-blues-rock. I just meant that really at it's core it's mostly blues. It's all based on blues scales and the general 'feel' of blues is so prominent in his tracks. I guess Jimi was playing rock with heavy blues influences. I just always associate the word rock with like the rolling stones and elvis etc which are miles away from Hendrix. Feels wrong to associate Hendrix with rock music, psychedelic and blues fit him so much more.
Check out how many times "blues" comes up here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rolling_Stones
You are being overly anal and intellectual.
Yes, Hendrix, Stones, Zep, etc were all inspired by, influenced by, and utilized lots of blues riffs/techniques/patterns but there is no denying they are the who defined the sound of modern rock and roll.
Also no denying that Bar 9 gives me the blues

Re: BAR 9's older shit...
I've said already that the stones are clearly standard rock through and through. Zeppelin are one of the first metal bands though. Hendrix was so much closer to blues than those two bands.Jean-Luc Cougar wrote:And by your definition the Rolling Stones, and Led Zeppelin would be blues as well, their usage of blues scales, chord changes, etc and even covering blues songs.paravrais wrote:
I can kinda see what people mean here, I guess Hendrix did evolve into a kind of psychedelic-blues-rock. I just meant that really at it's core it's mostly blues. It's all based on blues scales and the general 'feel' of blues is so prominent in his tracks. I guess Jimi was playing rock with heavy blues influences. I just always associate the word rock with like the rolling stones and elvis etc which are miles away from Hendrix. Feels wrong to associate Hendrix with rock music, psychedelic and blues fit him so much more.
Check out how many times "blues" comes up here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rolling_Stones
You are being overly anal and intellectual.
Yes, Hendrix, Stones, Zep, etc were all inspired by, influenced by, and utilized lots of blues riffs/techniques/patterns but there is no denying they are the who defined the sound of modern rock and roll.
Also no denying that Bar 9 gives me the blues
And yes, I am overly anal and intellectual. I never claimed otherwise XD
- Jean-Luc Cougar
 - Posts: 68
 - Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:43 pm
 
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
My point was you are wrongparavrais wrote: I've said already that the stones are clearly standard rock through and through. Zeppelin are one of the first metal bands though. Hendrix was so much closer to blues than those two bands.
And yes, I am overly anal and intellectual. I never claimed otherwise XD
You are saying they are "standard rock" when they are just as "blues" as Hendrix or probably even more so.
Anyway, let's stop arguing and derailing - I think we can agree that most 60's rock was very blues driven.
Re: BAR 9's older shit...
0.oJean-Luc Cougar wrote:My point was you are wrongparavrais wrote: I've said already that the stones are clearly standard rock through and through. Zeppelin are one of the first metal bands though. Hendrix was so much closer to blues than those two bands.
And yes, I am overly anal and intellectual. I never claimed otherwise XD
You are saying they are "standard rock" when they are just as "blues" as Hendrix or probably even more so.
Anyway, let's stop arguing and derailing - I think we can agree that most 60's rock was very blues driven.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
