New Spam Bot Rules.

kaiori breathe · Post by **kaiori breathe** » Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:57 am

legend4ry wrote:THIS ONLY COUNTS FOR SPAM BOTS! PLEASE DO NO POST USER NAMES OF THOSE YOU DON'T LIKE!

...

...

>_>

<_<

... Legend4ry

BLAHBLAHJAH · Post by **BLAHBLAHJAH** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:58 pm

WOO!

NEW SPAMBOT RULES

pete_bubonic · Post by **pete_bubonic** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:32 pm

knell wrote:
Basic A wrote:Official bot rule #2 ... DONT REPLY TO THIER THREADS!!!
Rule 5) Learn to count and spellcheck (first of all, lest you sound like the mindless drones you herald against with such vigor) and also, understand the logic of the bots

they will not stop. it's a fact that all forums have to face. lock/delete/hate them all you want, they operate on traffic, as long as this forum generates traffic, they will continue.

that being said, the best way to fight them is to laugh and realize that they are silly, and the traffic they try to generate is a sign of the times, while waiting for the mods to do what they're here to do (aside from the rare exception of true forum misconduct)

true, you shouldnt reply, but if you do... who cares? its a negligible increase in a problem that will be constantly persistent. no arguing that... (unless you're a special kind of ignorant).

if you cant overlook spam, and it truly bothers you... i pity you. i really do. riding a moral high horse on bots is as asinine as the causes the bots propagate.

I've read this twice, and sections of it thrice. I fail to comprehend the reasoning behind someone so virulently trying to defend the rights of spambots and leaving them to clutter up the forum. I struggle to understand who you're having your little outcry at, the forum, the moderators, the moral leanings of removing spam bot postings?! I thought I would respond forthright, declaring that, on the off chance there is something affecting you directly or you have actual constructive criticism to offer then this would be a great place to air these helpful suggestions and/or anecdotes. However your post is drenched in bitterness and unfocussed miserable wanting and I fear being constructive was indeed, not your desired conclusion to your post.

At the end of this moral and somewhat post ironic meta dissection of your curious post, I came to the inevitable conclusion theres only one suitable response, imagine my chagrin when I continued on with the contents of this thread, only to discover it had already been delivered most comedically.

Basic A wrote:
cool story bro

Par.

3za · Post by **3za** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:14 am

Any one need a new sports bra, Tripwire is a girl right

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=132075

Tragic_Gash · Post by **Tragic_Gash** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:23 am

3za wrote:Any one need a new sports bra, Tripwire is a girl right
http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=132075

yes, but why are bullet casings made out of brass?

3za · Post by **3za** » Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:11 pm

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=141875

3za · Post by **3za** » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:09 am

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=141943

Basic A · Post by **Basic A** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:41 am

yeeeeaaaahhh fucking great...

http://dubstepforum.com/search.php?auth ... 0&sr=posts

surefya · Post by **surefya** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:38 am

gogetbal

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=134233

Technosaurus · Post by **Technosaurus** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:05 am

skisshop

http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=169902

tavravlavish · Post by **tavravlavish** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:29 am

knell wrote:
Basic A wrote:Official bot rule #2 ... DONT REPLY TO THIER THREADS!!!
Rule 5) Learn to count and spellcheck (first of all, lest you sound like the mindless drones you herald against with such vigor) and also, understand the logic of the bots

they will not stop. it's a fact that all forums have to face. lock/delete/hate them all you want, they operate on traffic, as long as this forum generates traffic, they will continue.

that being said, the best way to fight them is to laugh and realize that they are silly, and the traffic they try to generate is a sign of the times, while waiting for the mods to do what they're here to do (aside from the rare exception of true forum misconduct)

true, you shouldnt reply, but if you do... who cares? its a negligible increase in a problem that will be constantly persistent. no arguing that... (unless you're a special kind of ignorant).

if you cant overlook spam, and it truly bothers you... i pity you. i really do. riding a moral high horse on bots is as asinine as the causes the bots propagate.

hahah what the hell is that?

wub · Post by **wub** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:54 pm

phones65

http://www.dubstepforum.com/memberlist. ... e&u=142223

wub · Post by **wub** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:56 pm

never mind

deadly_habit · Post by **deadly_habit** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:59 pm

phone65

3za · Post by **3za** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:19 pm

nevermind...

qwaycee_ · Post by **qwaycee_** » Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:10 am

AbReS

deadly_habit · Post by **deadly_habit** » Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:18 pm

Rustyz

Ongelegen · Post by **Ongelegen** » Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:27 pm

tomclancy

Rekah · Post by **Rekah** » Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:30 pm

Project EX wrote:tomclancy

was going to say that

Trichome · Post by **Trichome** » Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:09 am

Blue Lotus Apps

New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New spammer rules...

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New spammer rules...

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Re: New Spam Bot Rules.

Who is online