mp3, flac, or wav??

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
jatminx
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:40 pm

mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by jatminx » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:59 am

jeet,

I'm a beginning dj, started out with vinyl, but now i have traktor pro scratch, to combine vinyl with digital releases. Now my question is: should i go with 320 kb mp3, flacs or wav files? Or does it only depends on how big my ambitions are :wink: (big club sound vs crappy bar sound)? Or is wav primordial for a good bass sound????

I know this is an ongoing debate, but I found too much contradictory statements on the internet.. So i wanted to learn some personal experiences from dj's out the bass scene.. If their is allready a thread about this, didn't found it, sorry.

Greetings jatminx

User avatar
isiahfire
Posts: 1072
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by isiahfire » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:17 pm

Flac is supposed to be highest quality, but will sometimes need converting before using with some applications.

Choose WAV over MP3, but if you must use them, don't buy lower than 320kb!

Shum
Posts: 9851
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:14 am

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by Shum » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:49 pm

Given the choice .WAV always. End of story.

edit: The assumption above being that you are aiming for maximum fidelity. 320's are a more practical solution as they are cheaper and the filesizes are much smaller.
Last edited by Shum on Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
murky21
Fantasy Football King
Posts: 6541
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:25 pm
Location: London SW6 / EC2A

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by murky21 » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:50 pm

nah WAV is the highest quality. It is an exact reproduction of how it was made in the studio...

check the bit rates, wavs are around 1400kbps , flac varies more at around 900 usually.

Flacs however take up less space on ur HDD and probably deliver pretty much the same audible quality (to my ear i can not hear the difference)

if you have the option get solely flac or wav though this can end up being that bit more expensive but its worth it.... check sites like digital-tunes.net (no handling fee) or trackitdown.net or boomkat.com who both offer wav/ flac at reasonable price

if you start mixing mp3's with flac on a rig/ decent system you will hear the difference, but if just at home its probably cool...

if you are buying mp3's as well as 320's, mp3 VBR are fine too even if they are around 250kps as they do away with unessacary high bitrates for certain parts of songs and AAC files are decent(ish) as it is a newer technology.

but yeah just get flac/wav doesnt really matter..

dr h
Posts: 212
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:41 am

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by dr h » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:02 pm

Why would anyone want the wav, if a FLAC is available? It's the exact same thing, just compressed. You can convert the FLAC back to WAV, even to the point where the CRC is the same...

I did notice a few 24bit WAVS on bleep lately though. I'm not sure if FLAC can convert those perfectly, but if it can't, that would be the only reason ever to download a WAV file.

dj jahson
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:36 pm

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by dj jahson » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:41 pm

People buy WAV over FLAC because most digital dj software won't play FLAC.
If you are going to buy digital files buy WAV, they sound 3x louder over a club sound. Other dj's always ask how i get my tracks so loud, so i know it's not just me who's hearing it.

kpnutnut
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:22 pm

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by kpnutnut » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:45 pm

WAV is best. Wav is most renowned. WAV FTW. WAV WAV WAV WAV WAV!

Flac = PRFFTT cos you cant play them on alot of devices. stupid compression bullshizzle.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAVVVVVVVVVVV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

manray
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:09 am

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by manray » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:58 pm

FYI FLAC is lossless.

So a FLAC + WAV are 100% identical, bit for bit.

The only downside to flac is lack of player support.

As for playing out, I use MP3's. Anyone that thinks you can hear the difference between a 320kbps MP3 and a WAV on any club system is talking complete shite.

laurent__duval
Posts: 2221
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: nottingham
Contact:

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by laurent__duval » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:42 pm

nah, straight youtube rip is the way.

http://www.ripyoutube.com/ its all you need, baby!

jatminx
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:40 pm

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by jatminx » Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:37 pm

Thanks for the info. Think i'm gonna go with the highest quality that's possible on the site.

Ans youtuberips? hopefully just a joke :-)

laurent__duval
Posts: 2221
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: nottingham
Contact:

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by laurent__duval » Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:34 pm

jatminx wrote:
Ans youtuberips? hopefully just a joke :-)

no mate, sounds super clear through a big club rig! -q-

User avatar
roshman111
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 9:56 pm
Location: Stevenage/Aberystwyth, UK

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by roshman111 » Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:43 pm

laurent__duval wrote:nah, straight youtube rip is the way.

http://www.ripyoutube.com/ its all you need, baby!
YDK!

triggerfinger
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:46 pm

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by triggerfinger » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:18 pm

manray wrote:FYI FLAC is lossless.

So a FLAC + WAV are 100% identical, bit for bit.

The only downside to flac is lack of player support.

As for playing out, I use MP3's. Anyone that thinks you can hear the difference between a 320kbps MP3 and a WAV on any club system is talking complete shite.



totally agree mate, theres hardley any differnce between 320 mp3 and WAV butanything below its pretty peak

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by fractal » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:23 pm

AAC

hi fi is for nerds
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by wolf89 » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:34 pm

murky21 wrote:nah WAV is the highest quality. It is an exact reproduction of how it was made in the studio...

check the bit rates, wavs are around 1400kbps , flac varies more at around 900 usually.

Flacs however take up less space on ur HDD and probably deliver pretty much the same audible quality (to my ear i can not hear the difference)

if you have the option get solely flac or wav though this can end up being that bit more expensive but its worth it.... check sites like digital-tunes.net (no handling fee) or trackitdown.net or boomkat.com who both offer wav/ flac at reasonable price

if you start mixing mp3's with flac on a rig/ decent system you will hear the difference, but if just at home its probably cool...

if you are buying mp3's as well as 320's, mp3 VBR are fine too even if they are around 250kps as they do away with unessacary high bitrates for certain parts of songs and AAC files are decent(ish) as it is a newer technology.

but yeah just get flac/wav doesnt really matter..
Flac's reduce file size without data loss. It's like zipping a folder of files. Nothing's lost but it uses less hard drive space. So Wav and Flac are identical in sound

User avatar
rob_booth
Posts: 3550
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:37 pm
Location: HOUNDSTOOTH | Electronic Explorations | A&R
Contact:

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by rob_booth » Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:00 am

FLAC is fine ... WAV is choice ... if encoding to mp3 .. choose V0 with lame 3.98.2

as for media players, use foobar2000, a very powerful multi-media platform

masterchief
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:40 pm
Location: LONDON LEEDS

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by masterchief » Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:54 am

if you have 320 mp3s or wav files but you play them through i tunes does it convert them to aac? or is that different? will that affect quality when you burn a c.d ?

User avatar
brent
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:51 pm

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by brent » Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:30 am

i have most of my vinyls backed up in FLAC, but then i found out there aren't any CDJs that support FLAC. OR ARE THERE?!? -e-

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by fractal » Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:40 am

brent wrote:i have most of my vinyls backed up in FLAC, but then i found out there aren't any CDJs that support FLAC. OR ARE THERE?!? -e-
some do, the 2000 for example
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

User avatar
murky21
Fantasy Football King
Posts: 6541
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:25 pm
Location: London SW6 / EC2A

Re: mp3, flac, or wav??

Post by murky21 » Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:47 am

rob booth wrote:FLAC is fine ... WAV is choice ... if encoding to mp3 .. choose V0 with lame 3.98.2

as for media players, use foobar2000, a very powerful multi-media platform
man I have be trying to rinse foobar but the user interface is AWFUL no?

on forums its very highly recommended as puts out a decent sound apparently but man, having all of these repository directories aint all the handy, I just want a media library which I can drag and drop shit into..

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests