on it's best it's a 1000pete bubonic wrote:Small system?! 500 watts?!mIrReN wrote:well, I first heard it through my headphones (which are good). But at a party it was like woaaah so 2 weeks ago I finally bought a soundsystem (small one 500 watt) and damnit, wtf, best thing I've bought in my entire life (besides my laptop obv.)
they're exactly what they sound like hahamIrReN wrote:on it's best it's a 1000pete bubonic wrote:Small system?! 500 watts?!mIrReN wrote:well, I first heard it through my headphones (which are good). But at a party it was like woaaah so 2 weeks ago I finally bought a soundsystem (small one 500 watt) and damnit, wtf, best thing I've bought in my entire life (besides my laptop obv.)
like only need 50 more of those and I can play some Matty G =D
Edit; someone explain please "gangstastep" "metalbass" with examples :s
sittin on 650pete bubonic wrote:Small system?! 500 watts?!mIrReN wrote:well, I first heard it through my headphones (which are good). But at a party it was like woaaah so 2 weeks ago I finally bought a soundsystem (small one 500 watt) and damnit, wtf, best thing I've bought in my entire life (besides my laptop obv.)
incnic wrote:pictire disc ones track harder than the black ones due to the colopured pgment being magnetsed for the stylus
Love it.brasco wrote:I got the inbuilt speakers on my laptop, when I'm ripping 128's from YouTube the midrange makes me want to do something to a relative and potentially find another relatives wedding ring
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
*slowclap* exctly what i was trying to say...and icanican't's post was on point aswellRönin wrote:I haven't got the same opinion as Fractal. Personally if I was only listening stuffs like Loefah etc through my headphones (which are already quite good) I would already be like "yeah man this is cool". But to me, hearing Mud dropping on a powerful system at a party was like a revelation. Now listening to this only gives me a small clue about how big the tunes sound on a blazing system... The thing is that most people saying the "deeper" side of the sound is weak say that because they've never experienced it on a proper system. So yeah in a way I agree with OP, in a way brostep is "cheaper" because you get the essential of the music through pretty much anything. You need 20 000W to get what sub-bass is truly about.
fixedslanguage wrote:you can basically hear everything it has to offer by listening to one or two tunes
*golf clap*slanguage wrote:*slowclap* exctly what i was trying to say...and icanican't's post was on point aswellRönin wrote:I haven't got the same opinion as Fractal. Personally if I was only listening stuffs like Loefah etc through my headphones (which are already quite good) I would already be like "yeah man this is cool". But to me, hearing Mud dropping on a powerful system at a party was like a revelation. Now listening to this only gives me a small clue about how big the tunes sound on a blazing system... The thing is that most people saying the "deeper" side of the sound is weak say that because they've never experienced it on a proper system. So yeah in a way I agree with OP, in a way brostep is "cheaper" because you get the essential of the music through pretty much anything. You need 20 000W to get what sub-bass is truly about.
and before anyone says anything...i clearly stated i do like some of brostep so its not a hate thread...just me throwing an idea out there and seeing everyonelse's POV
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
But if you have never heard anything over a decent system or even with a sub then how are you supposed to enjoy the deeper stuff? Obviously they do just like that style like you say but part, not the whole, of the reason it is more popular is because it is more accessible because there is less of a need for a decent system/ speakersfractal wrote:*golf clap*slanguage wrote:*slowclap* exctly what i was trying to say...and icanican't's post was on point aswellRönin wrote:I haven't got the same opinion as Fractal. Personally if I was only listening stuffs like Loefah etc through my headphones (which are already quite good) I would already be like "yeah man this is cool". But to me, hearing Mud dropping on a powerful system at a party was like a revelation. Now listening to this only gives me a small clue about how big the tunes sound on a blazing system... The thing is that most people saying the "deeper" side of the sound is weak say that because they've never experienced it on a proper system. So yeah in a way I agree with OP, in a way brostep is "cheaper" because you get the essential of the music through pretty much anything. You need 20 000W to get what sub-bass is truly about.
and before anyone says anything...i clearly stated i do like some of brostep so its not a hate thread...just me throwing an idea out there and seeing everyonelse's POV
yes, everything sounds different on a system, bass heavy music especially. I wasnt disagreeing with that fact, I was stating that people like hype because they like it, not because of their laptop speakers
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
No u can'tfractal wrote:Also, lol @ u need 20K watts to understand. I could blow your mind with 400 watts in a small studio or car!
Lol yeah I got overexcited on that one. But I keep thinking on a really big system it's something different. I'm talking out of my personal experience, going from listening to Flux Pavilion on an ipod station to feeling a Ramadanman tune in a party was the thing that changed my vision on dubstep, and I think it would be the case with many other people.fractal wrote:Also, lol @ u need 20K watts to understand. I could blow your mind with 400 watts in a small studio or car!
There is indeed a lot of different types of dubstep, actually I think every producer has its own vision of what dubstep is. But here we're talking about the more midrange-focused side. And for me hearing that kind of sound on my ipod or in a party just doesn't change a thing, while with the more sub-bass focused tracks it's the complete opposite.fractal wrote:Agree to disagree. So you're saying the same thing happened to DnB? People can't afford speakers so they just listen to midrange? What kind of speakers do I need to enjoy funky, which is neither "deep" nor "hype"? The problem with this thought process is that it pretends that hype and deep are the only two types of dubstep out there... What about wild rhythmic dubstep?
cloaked_up wrote:im not a fan of belgium tho TBQH (genocide in the congo anyone????)
Where'd you hear those terms?fractal wrote:the real question is metalbass or gangtastep?
I'm just tired or reading Brostep everywhere, tried to come up with something catchy and more descriptive.that's true tbfRönin wrote:... But here we're talking about the more midrange-focused side. And for me hearing that kind of sound on my ipod or in a party just doesn't change a thing, while with the more sub-bass focused tracks it's the complete opposite.
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
Rönin wrote: And for me hearing that kind of sound on my ipod or in a party just doesn't change a thing, while with the more sub-bass focused tracks it's the complete opposite.
yeah...that's my point...Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
