debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
Caski
Posts: 1600 Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:43 pm
Location: Bristol
Contact:
Post
by Caski » Tue May 17, 2011 2:22 pm
VIDEO
syrup
Reigning Mini-Mix King
Posts: 8351 Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: down in my heart
Post
by syrup » Tue May 17, 2011 3:05 pm
VIDEO
dubfordessert wrote: you can jizz on me if you want
Sparxy
Posts: 1188 Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:26 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Contact:
Post
by Sparxy » Tue May 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Come on guys he mentioned Noisia. Alot of the deeper shit you're suggesting (whilst most of it is fucking awesome) it is definitely nothing like Noisia in dubstep form. It's funny... he mentioned less mid range and went on to post a Skrillex remix
Something like this OP?
VIDEO
Sparxy
Posts: 1188 Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:26 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Contact:
Post
by Sparxy » Tue May 17, 2011 3:14 pm
johney wrote: VIDEO
This one is big
Kurups
Posts: 60 Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 10:20 am
Post
by Kurups » Tue May 17, 2011 3:18 pm
DOWNLINK
THE OTHERS
Los Angeles
dragstar
Posts: 453 Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:56 pm
Location: London
Post
by dragstar » Tue May 17, 2011 3:55 pm
VIDEO
hows that?
Montgomery Burns
Posts: 235 Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:16 am
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:
Post
by Montgomery Burns » Tue May 17, 2011 3:57 pm
dragstar wrote: VIDEO
hows that?
THIS ! Good choice for what you want imo
-[2]DAY_-
Posts: 2797 Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 am
Post
by -[2]DAY_- » Tue May 17, 2011 5:14 pm
pikeymobile wrote:
How can one song thats 140bpm be slower than another song that's 140bpm?
lol this x1000
anything but "slower" or "downtempo" , such a carelessly misused descriptor
unless you actually mean tempo.
NickUndercover
Posts: 2686 Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Belgium
Post
by NickUndercover » Tue May 17, 2011 5:46 pm
-[2]DAY_- wrote: pikeymobile wrote:
How can one song thats 140bpm be slower than another song that's 140bpm?
lol this x1000
anything but "slower" or "downtempo" , such a carelessly misused descriptor
unless you actually mean tempo.
You didn't get it mate ITS ALL ABOUT THE SPEED OF THE WOBBLES !!!
cloaked_up wrote: im not a fan of belgium tho TBQH (genocide in the congo anyone????)
wobbles
Posts: 7056 Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:51 pm
Location: New York
Contact:
Post
by wobbles » Tue May 17, 2011 6:51 pm
VIDEO
VIDEO
VIDEO
VIDEO
deesee
Posts: 309 Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:53 pm
Location: sheffield & ox/bucks
Post
by deesee » Wed May 18, 2011 12:13 am
sorry for the shameless self promo, i tried to make this tune high energy but pure sub mostly
VIDEO
this is the shit u need in ur ears
VIDEO
syrup
Reigning Mini-Mix King
Posts: 8351 Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: down in my heart
Post
by syrup » Thu May 19, 2011 3:11 pm
how could i forget this one..
VIDEO
dubfordessert wrote: you can jizz on me if you want
mIrReN
Posts: 5611 Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
Location: Belgium, Bruges
Post
by mIrReN » Thu May 19, 2011 3:44 pm
VIDEO
/thread
"If your chest ain't rattlin it ain't happenin'" - DJ Pinch
"Move pples bodies and stimulate their minds"
we just ride the wave
Life sucks; Get used² it.
big up your mum
Capture pt
Posts: 1294 Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:19 am
Location: Southampton
Post
by Capture pt » Thu May 19, 2011 4:10 pm
I also hate the "chilled" or "deep" pigeon holes.... just cuz something doesnt have a wobble midrange dont give it those labels... there SO much pressure from this vibe.... case and point here:
VIDEO
my face just screws and and melts at the youtube copy, let alone in the dance. this is proper skank hard material. no wobbles in sight.
leebass
Posts: 763 Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:27 pm
Post
by leebass » Thu May 19, 2011 4:12 pm
Should be right up your street:
VIDEO
VIDEO
VIDEO
This has a lot of energy:
VIDEO
yoowan
Posts: 768 Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:35 pm
Post
by yoowan » Thu May 19, 2011 4:31 pm
-[2]DAY_- wrote: pikeymobile wrote:
How can one song thats 140bpm be slower than another song that's 140bpm?
lol this x1000
anything but "slower" or "downtempo" , such a carelessly misused descriptor
unless you actually mean tempo.
usually its because so much subheavy, weighty tracks like the above can actually sound like they're at 70 bpm
you're not wrong, you're just an asshole
Capture pt
Posts: 1294 Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:19 am
Location: Southampton
Post
by Capture pt » Thu May 19, 2011 5:22 pm
yoowan wrote: -[2]DAY_- wrote: pikeymobile wrote:
How can one song thats 140bpm be slower than another song that's 140bpm?
lol this x1000
anything but "slower" or "downtempo" , such a carelessly misused descriptor
unless you actually mean tempo.
usually its because so much subheavy, weighty tracks like the above can actually sound like they're at 70 bpm
pikeymobile
Posts: 4421 Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:22 am
Post
by pikeymobile » Thu May 19, 2011 5:48 pm
yoowan wrote: -[2]DAY_- wrote: pikeymobile wrote:
How can one song thats 140bpm be slower than another song that's 140bpm?
lol this x1000
anything but "slower" or "downtempo" , such a carelessly misused descriptor
unless you actually mean tempo.
usually its because so much subheavy, weighty tracks like the above can actually sound like they're at 70 bpm
I actually can't tell if you're being serious
-[2]DAY_-
Posts: 2797 Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 am
Post
by -[2]DAY_- » Thu May 19, 2011 5:49 pm
xD get the fuck outa here hahaha
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests