skotyb wrote:Fuck James Blake, seriously.
Does my head in.
hes just messing around.
skotyb wrote:Fuck James Blake, seriously.
Does my head in.
garethom wrote:I played this tune and the sub sucked my cat in and he came out wearing a tuxedo or something, it was filhty
garethom wrote:I played this tune and the sub sucked my cat in and he came out wearing a tuxedo or something, it was filhty
garethom wrote:skotyb wrote: The drummer is cool, he's got the drums spot on.
here here! i'm hoping to hear it in maymeanmrcustard wrote: Always foolhardy to judge from a phone recording though, would definitely still like to hear it live.
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
dro524 wrote:There was a different audio clip of this cover that sounded better. His voice doesn't sound very good in that one
Edit: found it,
<iframe src="/forum/video.php?url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=to0IYfI4EAY" frameborder="0" style="overflow:hidden; height:auto; max-width:540px"></iframe>
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
NilsFG wrote:It's not bad, but doesn't compare to the original if you ask me.
At least it's not an abomination like his Changes remix.
James Blake is just a hype IMO.

Yeah.. it doesn't compare to the original because It's a live performance. I doubt he's even recorded it, let alone thought about releasing it. It's a cover, a tribute like that other guy said. I can't see how you can really say the original is better, it's a moot point.NilsFG wrote:It's not bad, but doesn't compare to the original if you ask me.
At least it's not an abomination like his Changes remix.
James Blake is just a hype IMO.
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests